Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 23))

  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

Shakespeare’s drive towards knowledge, and the dramatic realization of knowledge, led him constantly to invoke, monitor, and test to the limits of human comprehension the relationship between figure and ground, between “man” and “elements.” His problematizing of the natural attitude towards the elemental is perhaps most apparent in the great tragedies — especially in King Lear, where the radical instability of “nature” and its cognates is continuously in evidence — but the interrogation of the elements is at least as marked and important in the history plays, where prose and poetry mediate between process and purpose, successiveness and succession, between the apparently arbitrary successiveness of events and the resolution of the question of succession to the throne of England into the more or less consoling configurations of dynasty and national destiny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, e.g., the conclusion to David Scott Kastan, Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time (Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. the central argument of Frederick Turner, Shakespeare and the Nature of Time (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For this tradition of interpretation see, e.g., Philip Edwards, “The Late Comedies,” Shakespeare: Select Bibliographical Guides ed. Stanley Wells (London: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 120 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Tempest, The Riverside Shakespeare ed. G. B. Evans et al (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974). All further quotations from Shakespeare follow this edition and are identified parenthetically in the text of this essay.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The semantic possibilities available to Shakespeare are well documented in OED via John Florio’s A World of Wordes, or Most Copious and Exact Dictionarie in Italian and English (1598): “Aere (aire, aira) the aire. Also an aspect, countenance, cheere, a look or appearance in the face of man or woman. Also, a tune or aire of a song or ditty.”

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Apology for Raymond Sebond,” as quoted by Ricardo Quinones in The Renaissance Discovery of Time, Harvard Studies in Comparative Literature no. 31 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Patricia Parker, Inescapable Romance (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979), opening pages.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In his edition of Cymbeline (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960, p. 220), J. C. Maxwell inclines to the view that the derivation of mulier from mollis “is still probable.” However, this etymology is rated dubious in the new Oxford Latin Dictionary ed. P. W. Glare, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1976). For conventions and problems see Frank L. Borchardt, “Etymology in Tradition and in the Northern Renaissance,” Journal of the History of Ideas 29 (1968), pp. 415–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michael J. B. Allen, Marsilio Ficino and the Phaedran Charioteer (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), pp. 82–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niccolo Macchiavelli, The Prince trans, and ed. Robert M. Adams (New York: Norton, 1977), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a fine account of a very complicated situation, see Arthur B. Ferguson, Clio Unbound: Perception of the Social and Cultural Past in Renaissance England (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. an essay I read after writing my own, Jonathan Goldberg, “Shakespearean Inscriptions: The Voicing of Power,” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman (London: Methuen, 1985), p. 119 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Findlay, L.M. (1988). Temporality Puts on Airs: Process, Purpose, and Poetry in Shakespeare’s Histories. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Poetics of the Elements in the Human Condition: Part 2 The Airy Elements in Poetic Imagination. Analecta Husserliana, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2841-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2841-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7662-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2841-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics