Abstract
The post-structuralist rejection of both the text as an autonomous entity and the self as a wholeness present unto itself stems primarily from an intellectual approach to life and literature that neglects the finer feeling level of human perception. This level is central to Vedic literature (Veda means pure knowledge), which arranges the human faculties in order of increasing subtlty from the five senses to the mind, intellect, ego, and self (or pure consciousness).1 At its finest level of functioning, the intellect is experienced as a mode of feeling, which may also be described as intuition. The finest level of feeling is love or devotion, which unites the self and other, the absolute and relative.2 As a unifying force, feeling is closely related to memory, that quality of consciousness which enables it to be self-referral while remaining open to the mind and senses. The Manduka Upanishad classifies consciousness into three ordinary states — waking, sleeping, and dreaming — plus a higher, fourth state called transcendental pure consciousness, a self-referral state in which consciousness has no object other than itself.3 By linking oppositions such as subject and object, inside and outside, past and present, feeling and memory allow us to be open to the unity of transcendental consciousness and the diversity of the other faculties at the same time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Chapter three, verse 42, of the Bhagavad-Gita states, “The senses, they say, are subtle;/more subtle than the senses is mind;/yet finer than mind is intellect; that which is beyond even the intellect is he”: Maharish Mahesh Yogi, On The Bhagavad-Gita: A New Translation and Commentary Chapters 1–6 (New York: Penguin Books, 1969), p. 242.
For an excellent study of the deconstructive attempt to undermine foundations, see Vincent B. Leitch, Deconstructive Criticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), pp. 24–54.
Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), p. 59.
See Robert Scholes, Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1985), pp. 74–85
“Decoding Papa: ‘A Very Short Story’” as “Work and Text,” Literary Theories in Praxis, ed. Shirley F. Staton (Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press, 1987), pp. 170–179.
For a wide range of essays in reader-response criticism, see Jane P. Tompkins, ed., Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980)
Susan R. Suleiman and Inge Crosman, eds., The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).
For a comprehensive overview of Vedic language theory, see Harold G. Coward, The Sphota Theory of Language (Columbia, Missouri: South Asia Books, 1980); and Bhartrhari (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1976).
See On The Bhagavad-Gita, chapter four, verse one, for a commentary on the relation between history and the creative aspect of Mother Divine, pp. 251–255.
Vladimir Propp, The Morphology of the Folktale (Austin, Texas: Texas University Press, 1968), pp. 20–21.
Elizabeth Bowen, The Death of the Heart (London: Victor Gollancz, 1938), p. 256. All further page references are included in the text.
Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction (London: Basil Blackwell Publisher Limited, 1983), p. 166.
Anika Lemaire, Jacques Lacan, trans. David Macey (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977), p. 126.
Ibid., pp. 78–92 passim.
Ellie Ragland-Sullivan, Jacques Lacan and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987), pp. 162–183 passim.
Julia Kristeva, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Leon S. Roudiez (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980), pp. 271–294 passim.
Wolfgang Iser, “The Reading Process: A Phenomenology Approach,” Contemporary Literary Criticism: Modernism through Poststructuralism, ed. Robert Con Davis (New York and London: Longman, 1986), pp. 376–377.
See Robert Keith Wallace, The Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field: The Neurophysiology of Enlightenment (Fairfield, Iowa: MIU Neuroscience Press, 1986).
Coward, The Sphota Theory of Language, pp. 126–137 passim.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haney, W.S. (1990). Phenomenology and the Structure of Desirability. In: Kronegger, M. (eds) Phenomenology and Aesthetics. Analecta Husserliana, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2027-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2027-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7409-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2027-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive