Abstract
In this chapter, I illustrate that people accumulate idiosyncratic experiences as a repertoire of communicative resources and, in many everyday interactions, use those elements to strike out in new, more loosely encoded, de-enregistered ways. In the face of this kind of everyday creativity, however, a question arises: How do people make sense of each other? Without adhering to the normative expectations of language, dialect and register, how do people interacting know what counts as a communicatively relevant repertoire element? This chapter answers that question by using the concept of metacommentary—or comments about language—as a new ordering principal for understanding heteroglossic communication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agha, A. 2005. Voice, footing, & enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 38–59.
Agha, A. 2006. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bakhtin, M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination, ed. M. Holquist, 259–422. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bucholtz, M. 2009. From Stance to Style. In Jaffe, Alexandra (Ed). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. (pp. 146–170). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Gumperz, J. 1964. Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist 66(6 part 2):137–154.
Gumperz, J. 1965. Language. Biennial review of anthropology 4:84–120.
Kiesling, S. 2000 Australian English and Recent Migrant Groups. In Varieties of English Around the World: Focus on Australia, ed. David Blair and Michael Collins, 239–257. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Kroskrity, P., (ed.) 2000. Regimes of language. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
Lucy, J. 1993. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell-Kernan, C. 1972. Signifying and Marking: Two African-American Speech Acts. In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. J. Guymperz, and D. Hymes, 161–179. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
O’Connor, B. 2012. Racial identification, knowledge, and the politics of everyday life in an Arizona science classroom: A linguistic ethnography. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona.
Rampton, B. 2006. Language in late modernity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rymes, B. 1997. Second language socialization: A new approach to second language acquisition research. Journal of Intensive English Studies 11:143–155.
Rymes, B. 2001. Conversational borderlands: Language and identity in an alternative urban high school.
Rymes, B. 2010. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Focus on Communicative Repertoires. In Sociolinguistics and Language Education, ed. N. Hornberger and S. McKay, 528–546. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Rymes, B., M. Cahnmann-Taylor, and M. Souto-Manning. 2008. Bilingual teachers’ performances of power and conflict. Teaching Education Journal 19(2): 105–119.
Sante, L. 1998. The factory of facts. New York: Pantheon.
Silverstein, M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, ed. J. Lucy, 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rymes, B. (2014). Marking Communicative Repertoire Through Metacommentary. In: Blackledge, A., Creese, A. (eds) Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. Educational Linguistics, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7855-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7856-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)