Skip to main content

Marking Communicative Repertoire Through Metacommentary

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 20))

Abstract

In this chapter, I illustrate that people accumulate idiosyncratic experiences as a repertoire of communicative resources and, in many everyday interactions, use those elements to strike out in new, more loosely encoded, de-enregistered ways. In the face of this kind of everyday creativity, however, a question arises: How do people make sense of each other? Without adhering to the normative expectations of language, dialect and register, how do people interacting know what counts as a communicatively relevant repertoire element? This chapter answers that question by using the concept of metacommentary—or comments about language—as a new ordering principal for understanding heteroglossic communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agha, A. 2005. Voice, footing, & enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agha, A. 2006. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination, ed. M. Holquist, 259–422. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M. 2009. From Stance to Style. In Jaffe, Alexandra (Ed). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. (pp. 146–170). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. 1964. Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist 66(6 part 2):137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. 1965. Language. Biennial review of anthropology 4:84–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling, S. 2000 Australian English and Recent Migrant Groups. In Varieties of English Around the World: Focus on Australia, ed. David Blair and Michael Collins, 239–257. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroskrity, P., (ed.) 2000. Regimes of language. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, J. 1993. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Kernan, C. 1972. Signifying and Marking: Two African-American Speech Acts. In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. J. Guymperz, and D. Hymes, 161–179. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. 2012. Racial identification, knowledge, and the politics of everyday life in an Arizona science classroom: A linguistic ethnography. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, B. 2006. Language in late modernity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B. 1997. Second language socialization: A new approach to second language acquisition research. Journal of Intensive English Studies 11:143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B. 2001. Conversational borderlands: Language and identity in an alternative urban high school.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B. 2010. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Focus on Communicative Repertoires. In Sociolinguistics and Language Education, ed. N. Hornberger and S. McKay, 528–546. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B., M. Cahnmann-Taylor, and M. Souto-Manning. 2008. Bilingual teachers’ performances of power and conflict. Teaching Education Journal 19(2): 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sante, L. 1998. The factory of facts. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, ed. J. Lucy, 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Betsy Rymes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rymes, B. (2014). Marking Communicative Repertoire Through Metacommentary. In: Blackledge, A., Creese, A. (eds) Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy. Educational Linguistics, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics