Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1114 Accesses

Abstract

In the abundant literature on the topic of water, Globalized Water offers an original contribution to the discourse: a collective and contemporary analysis of water resources and supply from a perspective clearly grounded in the social sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A frequently evoked false argument focuses on the abundance or scarcity of stocks or reservoirs of water that may one day run out, like oil. But since the volume of available water on the planet is practically constant, scientists prefer to think in terms of the perpetual cycle of freshwater (evaporation, condensation, precipitation, flow) (De Marsily 2009).

  2. 2.

    “Rés-EAU-ville” Groupement de Recherche du CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)/CNRS Urban Water Research Network.

  3. 3.

    Freshwater accounts for approximately 2.5 % of the Earth’s water (rivers, groundwater, oceans, and ice caps). But water useful to humanity is to be found in water flows, which are a source of re-circulated freshwater (an annual 43,000 km3) (Margat and Andréassian 2008). Globally, the freshwater used by mankind for agriculture, energy, industry, towns, and cities accounts for less than one-tenth of annually available, renewed water, or, in other words, 3,800 km3 per year. Of the volume taken from natural sources, 10 % is used for human consumption (drinking water/domestic water) and a further 10 % is definitively consumed (not returned to the natural environment after use).

  4. 4.

    Water is conditioned by its environment (climate, geomorphology), which dictates the amount of time required to obtain it. Certain properties of water have a decisive influence in terms of social and spatial organization. Its fluidity makes it an ideal transporter; its direction of flow establishes what is upstream from what is downstream, etc. (See also CNRS 2009).

  5. 5.

    The paradox of agricultural irrigation in Nepal—“an abundant resource, carefully distributed”—can primarily be explained in reference to social and familial relations (Aubriot 2004).

  6. 6.

    For the impact of the development of water distribution systems on the emergence of the centralized state, see the debates over the work of Witfogel (1942) and Palem and Wolf (1972).

  7. 7.

    See Chap. 3.

  8. 8.

    For a summary of the network approach, refer to Chaps. 7 and 9.

  9. 9.

    Definitions of these different forms of water (resource, supply, network) can be found throughout the book.

  10. 10.

    Chapter 17 represents an effort to advance the combination of hydrological and social sciences approaches.

  11. 11.

    The management of a population hit by natural catastrophes (floods, etc.) or water-borne epidemics, for example.

  12. 12.

    The challenge for social sciences is to be recognized as a science with its own scientific objectives and methodologies. In terms of water sciences, social sciences refer to the human dimension associated with governance, policy, and management.

  13. 13.

    Of the 10 multinational water companies, nine are European (the two largest, Suez and Veolia, are French). The French “majors” are the Compagnie Générale des Eaux, now Veolia Environnement, and the Société Lyonnaise des Eaux, now Suez Environnement, a subsidiary of GDF Suez. SAUR is another major group but is less active in the water sector. The world’s two largest bottled water companies are also European. In addition, Europe boasts the world’s largest private investment funds specializing in the water sector as well as the most dynamic water infrastructure construction firms (dams, processing and desalination plants, artificial islands, etc.).

  14. 14.

    World Bank, IMF, OECD, WTO, United Nations/UNESCO International Hydrological Program, World Health Organization, various lobby groups and networks, Global Water Partnership (GWP), Académie de l’Eau, Aquafed, European Water Partnership, RIOB (Réseau International d’Organismes de Bassin), etc. The European actors in the water sector (France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Germany) define the agenda in a number of different ways and play a central role in driving the process forward.

  15. 15.

    United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 1972.

  16. 16.

    Notably thanks to the organization of the Water Decades: International Hydrological Decade (1965–1974); International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade (1981–1990); International Year of Freshwater (2003); International Decade for Action “Water for Life” (2005–2015); United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014); and a designated World Water Day on March 22.

  17. 17.

    Two major events occurred in 1992 that effectively laid the foundations of the international doxa: the Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro, where it was declared that “a global management of freshwater is … absolutely indispensable to any action in the decades to come …”, and the Dublin Water Conference, which established that “water in all its competing uses … should be recognized as an economic good.”

  18. 18.

    Affordability is a new concept in the business world reflecting the link between a good or service and the income of the household that wants to buy it.

  19. 19.

    Europe plays a key role in the evolution of the international doxa through the water industry and the network of public European companies providing new management approaches.

  20. 20.

    Originating at the University of Zaragoza in Spain, the “Nueva Cultura del Agua” (New Water Culture) movement proposes a new management paradigm: water as an eco-social asset, management on demand, and the unity of the river basin, with no transfers between basins and no dams. See Chap. 13.

  21. 21.

    The expression was decided collectively during the preparation of the book in Paris (January 2008).

  22. 22.

    See Pierre Bourdieu, “Préface” (Dezalay and Garth 1996).

  23. 23.

    Water model describes a system of relations between techniques, economics, and management.

  24. 24.

    This expression is used to describe the technico-institutional system and the water management culture by which it is characterized in France: decentralized management based on river basins, delegated management, etc.

  25. 25.

    In the book, “water service” or “urban service” also refers to local public water distribution and sanitation services.

  26. 26.

    See Footnote 13.

  27. 27.

    Antoine Frérot, CEO of Veolia, correctly highlights that “the private sector has a reputation for being more efficient than the public sector [and] offers access to a wide range of sources of funding …” p. 92 op.cit.

  28. 28.

    The ICSID, the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, is the World Bank’s arbitration body in Washington, DC.

  29. 29.

    To move forward on the question of governance, it is useful to review the discourse on the global water crisis, which establishes an implicit link with, as well as some confusion about, the growing scarcity of resources. The discourse also raises two critical issues: the imbalance between water resources and needs and the lack of access to drinking water (or clean water). Water resources are unequally distributed around the world. An analysis of water consumption reveals that agriculture—especially irrigation—uses more water than any other sector, including energy and industry. About one billion people living in developing countries, approximately a sixth of the world’s population, have no access to clean drinking water and sanitation (purifying domestic wastewater before disposing of it in the natural environment). There is little correlation between this situation and the issue of scarcity. Indeed, water is particularly abundant in central Africa, south Asia, and Latin America.

  30. 30.

    The offer model refers to the economic, technological, and management system developed worldwide since the end of World War II against a background of rebuilding, economic development, and colonial expansion. It implies that large-scale infrastructure projects sprung up all over the world: dams, irrigation systems, canals, hydroelectric plants, pumping systems, the rerouting of rivers, the transfer of water between river basins, and efforts to dry out marshland. Famous engineering schools are at the basis of the development of this model: École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (France), Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canals y Puertos (Spain), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc. The model has since been called into question by the advocates of sustainable development.

  31. 31.

    Schneier-Madanes, G. “L’eau objet social complexe” in Saragosse 2007, Catalogue de l’Exposition Internationale.

References

  • Aguilera Klink F (2008) La nueva cultura del agua. Los libros de la catarata, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréassian V, Margat J (2005) Allons-nous manquer d’EAU? Le Pommier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubriot O (2004) L’eau miroir d’une société, irrigation paysanne au Népal central. CNRS Editions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Barles S (1999) La ville délétère, Médecins et Ingénieurs dans l’espace urbain, XVIIIe – XIXè siècle. Éditions Champ Vallon, Paris, 372p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer CJ (2004) Siren song: Chilean water law as a model for international reform. RFF Press/The Johns Hopkins Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1994) Raisons pratiques. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe J (2003) The water strategy of the World Bank. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe J (1992) Clean water and sanitation. In: World Bank (ed) The world development report on the environment and development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Camdessus M, Badre B, Cheret I et al (2004) Eau. Robert Laffont, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • CNRS (2006) Programme interdisciplinaire Mousson, rapports de recherche 2006–8. Available in http://mousson.complexica.net

  • CNRS (2009) “L’eau”, FOCUS, No. 5, May. Available in www.cnrs.fr/fr/organisme/docs/espacedoc/eau_fr_web.pdf

  • Coutard O (2009) Placing splintering urbanism. Geoforum 39(6):1815–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marsily G (2009) L’eau, un trésor en partage. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mattos C, Figueroa O, Orellana A et al (eds) (2005) Gobernanza, competitividad y redes: La gestión en las ciudades del siglo XXI, Colección Rideal EURE-Libros. IEUT/PUC, Santiago, 533p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezalay Y, Garth B (1996) Dealing in virtue: international commercial arbitration and the emergence of a new international legal order. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin D (2010) La raison humanitaire. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger M, Allouche F, Luis-Manso P (eds) (2007) Water and liberalisation. European water scenarios. IWA, London, pp 34–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Frérot A (2009) Water. Towards a culture of responsibility. Ed. Autrement, Paris (non-commercial publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin JP (2007) Gouverner par contrat. Les presses de Sciences Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupement de recherche GDR 2524 CNRS “rés-EAU-ville” (2002/2005/2006/2009) Rapports scientifiques. CNRS, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon R (2002) Water follies. Groundwater pumping and the fate of America’s Fresh Water. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe CA, Vairavamoorthy K (2011) Sustainable water management in the city of the future. UNESCO-IHE, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouravlev Y (2004) Los servicios de agua potable y saneamiento en el umbral del siglo XXI. CEPAL/NU, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Laimé M (2003) Les dossiers de l’eau, pénurie, pollution, corruption. L’épreuve des faits. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascoumes P (1994) L’écopouvoir. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1999) Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawford RG, Landwehr JM, Sorooshian S et al (2003) International hydrological science programs and global water issues. In: Lawford R, Fort D et al (eds) Water: science, policy and management. AGU, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Strat A (ed) (2008) Manifestes pour l’eau publique. Syllepse, Fondation Copernic, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobina E, Hall D (2008) The illusions of competition in the water sector – a response to the OFWAT/Cave consultations on introducing competition in the water sector in England and Wales, PSIRU Reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic C, Tejada-Guibert A, Roche PA (2001) Frontiers in urban water management. Deadlock or hope? UNESCO-International Hydrological Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Margat J, Andréassian V (2008) L’eau. Le Cavalier Bleu, Coll. Idées reçues, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin P (2009) Public-private partnerships for urban water utilities, vol 8, The World Bank trends and policy options. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura K (2007) Signons la paix avec la Terre. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse B (2011) Heritage, public trust and non-market values in water governance. The University of Arizona, The Institute of the Environment, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin E (1977) La methode 1. La nature de la nature. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OMS/UNICEF (2004) Atteindre les objectifs ODM en matière d’eau potable et d’assainissement. Evaluation des progrès à mi-parcours

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palerm A, Wolf E (1972) Agricultura y Civilizacion en MesoamÕrica. Sepsetenta, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquerot S (2005) Eau douce. La nécessaire refondation du droit international. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrella R (2001) The water manifesto. Arguments for a world water contract. Fernwood, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña H, Solanes M (2003) Effective water governance in the Americas: a key issue. Third Water Forum, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Jones C (2007) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • PRINWASS (1998–2002) Barriers and conditions for the involvement of private capital and enterprise in water supply and sanitation in Latin America and Africa. The European Commission. Cambridge. Available in www.prinwass.org

  • Robbins P (2004) Political ecology: a critical introduction. Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers PP, Jalal KF, Boyd JA (2005) An introduction to sustainable development. The Continuing Education Division. Cambridge, Harvard University and Glen Educational Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunier ER, Meganck RA (2009) Global environmental governance, a dictionary & introduction. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier-Madanes G, Courel MF (eds) (2009) Water and sustainability in arid regions: bridging the gap between physical and social sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, 349p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier-Madanes G, de Gouvello B (eds) (2003) Eaux et réseaux: les défis de la mondialisation. IHEAL/La Documentation Française, Paris, 346p

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres M (2009) Temps des crises. Le Pommier coll. “Manifestes”, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauclin M et al (2008) Bilan et prospective SIC Surface et Interfaces Continentales 2006–2011. CNRS/INSU Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers. Available in http://www.insu.cnrs.fr/a2652,prospective-sic-2007.html

  • Witfogel (1942) Le despotisme oriental. Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka M (ed) (2007) Les sciences sociales en mutation. Editions Sciences Humaines, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • World Water Council (2005) L’eau, une affaire pour tous. World Water Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graciela Schneier-Madanes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneier-Madanes, G. (2014). Introduction. In: Schneier-Madanes, G. (eds) Globalized Water. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7323-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics