Abstract
‘Ubiquitous’ is a much abused adjective that literally means ‘being everywhere’ but in practice it means considerably less. The word is often trotted out by ecologists and systematists to justify their working on a particular group of plants or animals (e.g. ‘rodents make good bioindicators because they are ubiquitous in terrestrial ecosystems’), sometimes with little support for their assertions. However, mites have a fair claim for being truly omnipresent (Fig. 11.1). With the exception of the water column of the open ocean, they exist in every sort of aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal and parasitic habitat. In spite of this, mites rarely appear in general biodiversity surveys (but see Basset et al. 2012). Data on mite diversity in tropical ecosystems is especially rare. Two interrelated reasons for this neglect, shared with other ubiquitous and ‘hyper-diverse’ taxa such as nematodes, are small body size and alleged difficulty of identification. Small-bodied organisms are often overlooked in rapid assessments of biodiversity, particularly when samples are sorted with the naked eye. Even if mites are seen, it is almost impossible to identify them to species in the field; instead, maceration, slide-mounting and microscopic examination are required.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basset, Y., & 37 others. (2012). Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science, 338, 1481–1484. doi:10.1126/science.1226727.
Brown, J. M., & Wilson, D. S. (1994). Poecilochirus carabi: Behavioral and life-history adaptations to different hosts and the consequences of geographical shifts in host communities. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 1–22). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 345, 101–118.
Colwell, R. K., & Naeem, S. (1994). Life-history patterns of hummingbird flower mites in relation to host phenology and morphology. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 23–44). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Eickwort, G. C. (1994). Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and volutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 218–251). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Faris, J. A. (1996). The paradoxes of Zeno. Sydney: Avebury.
Hammond, P. M. (1992). Species inventory. In B. Groombridge (Ed.), Global biodiversity: Status of the earth’s living resources (pp. 17–39). London: Chapman & Hall.
Kitching, R. L., Bergelson, J. M., Lowman, M. D., McIntyre, S., & Carruthers, G. (1993). The biodiversity of arthropods from Australian rainforest canopies: General introduction, methods, sites and ordinal results. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 181–191.
Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., & Warfe, D. M. (2012). Habitat complexity: Approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia, 685, 1–17.
Lindquist, E. E., with contributions by Ainscough, B. D., Clulow, F. V., Funk, R. C., Marshall, V. G., Nesbitt, H. H. J., OConnor, B. M., Smith, I. M., & Wilkinson, P. R. (1979). Acari. In H. V. Danks (Ed.), Canada and its insect fauna (Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Vol. 108, pp. 252–263, 267–284).
Loder, N., Blackburn, T. M., & Gaston, K. J. (1997). The slippery slope: Towards an understanding of the body size frequency distribution. Oikos, 78, 195–201.
May, R. M. (1978). The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. In L. A. Mound & N. Waloff (Eds.), Diversity of insect faunas (pp. 188–204). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
May, R. M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science, 241, 1441–1449.
OConnor, B. M. (1990). The North American Acari: Current status and future projections. In M. Kosztarab & C. W. Schaefer (Eds.), Systematics of the North American insects and arachnids: Status and needs (Virginia agricultural experiment station information series 90–1, pp. 21–29). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
Pérez, T. M. (1996). The eggs of seven species of Fainalges Gaud and Berla (Xolalgidae) from the green conure (Aves, Psittacidae). In R. Mitchell, D. J. Horn, G. R. Needham & W. C. Welbourn (Eds.), Acarology IX: Volume 1, Proceedings (pp. 297–300). Columbus: Ohio Biological Survey.
Pollard, S. D., Beck, M. W., & Dodson, G. N. (1995). Why do male crab spiders drink nectar? Animal Behaviour, 49, 1443–1448.
Proctor, H. C., Kanowski, J., Wardell-Johnson, G., Reis, T., & Catterall, C. P. (2003). Does diversity beget diversity? A comparison between plant and leaf-litter invertebrate richness from pasture to rainforest. Records of the South Australian Museum Monograph Series, 7, 267–274.
Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Brooks, T. M. (2007). Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 713–737.
Seeman, O. D. (2000). The immature life stages of the Fedrizziidae (Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Acarologia, 41, 39–52.
Seeman, O. D. (2002). Mites and passalid beetles: Diversity, taxonomy and biogeography. Ph.D. thesis. The University of Queensland (p. 339).
Seeman, O. D. (2007). Revision of the Fedrizziidae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Zootaxa, 1480, 1–55.
Seeman, O. D., Proctor, H., Norton, R. A., & Colloff, M. (2001). Myriad Mesostigmata associated with log-inhabiting arthropods. In R. B. Halliday & D. E. Walter (Eds.), Acarology: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.
Stanton, N. L. (1979). Patterns of species diversity in temperate and tropical litter mites. Ecology, 60, 295–304.
Tr Treat, A. E. (1975). Mites of moths and butterflies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Walter, D. E., & O’Dowd, D. J. (1995). Beneath biodiversity: Factors influencing the diversity and abundance of canopy mites. Selbyana, 16, 12–20.
Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1998). Predatory mites in tropical Australia: Local species richness and complementarity. Biotropica, 30, 72–81. [this is cited as 1998b in the text, but should just be 1998]
Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1999). Mites: Ecology, evolution and behaviour (p. 322). Wallingford: University of NSW Press, Sydney and CABI. ISBN 0 86840 529 9.
Walter, D. E., Latonas S., & Byers, K. (2013). Almanac of Alberta Oribatida. Part 1. Ver. 2.3. Edmonton: The Royal Alberta Museum. http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/natural/insects/research/research.htm.
Walter, D. E., Seeman, O., Rodgers, D., & Kitching, R. L. (1998b). Mites in the mist: How unique is a rainforest canopy knockdown fauna? Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 501–508.
Walter, D. E., Lindquist, E. E., Smith, I. M., Cook, D. R., & Krantz, G. M. (2009). Order Trombidiformes. In G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter (Eds.), A manual of acarology (3rd ed., pp. 233–420). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
Wise, D. H. (1993). Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, M. R., Behan-Pelletier, V. M., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2012). Revealing the hyperdiverse mite fauna of subarctic Canada through DNA barcoding. PLoS One, 7, e48755. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048755.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walter, D.E., Proctor, H.C. (2013). Mites and Biological Diversity. In: Mites: Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7164-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7164-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7163-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7164-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)