Skip to main content

New Perspectives on Organism-Environment Interactions in Anthropology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Entangled Life

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 4))

Abstract

Anthropologists contend that the organism-environment connections responsible for human evolution are indirect—mediated by culture. This chapter reviews influential twentieth-century anthropological interpretations of the cultural mediation of human adaptations to environments, arguing that ethnography and other qualitative forms of analysis reveal important phenomena overlooked by quantitative analysts committed to methodological individualism. It highlights work by post-positivist anthropologists, who describe relations among human and non-human organisms, cultural forms, and features of environments as “natural-cultural” networks, an approach reminiscent of developmental systems theory and niche construction. Evolutionary theorists have much to gain by incorporating these sophisticated, contemporary post-positivist anthropological understandings of culture into their models of human-environment connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although disrespect has been expressed on both sides of the divide, the kind of contempt often expressed by sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists toward their critics has been particularly striking in my experience. Anthropologists and others committed to evolution, but critical of sociobiology, have risked being labeled “anti-science,” “anti-evolution,” or even “creationist.” As a result, many of us have had to adopt the position of “anti-antievolutionists,” who resist the critics of evolution, but who are unable to wholeheartedly affirm the hegemonic version of evolutionary theory (see Schultz 2009). The new developments and possibilities discussed in Parts 3 and 4 below may help change this state of affairs.

  2. 2.

    Sahlins began his career as a cultural evolutionary theorist (e.g. Sahlins and Service 1960), but his views about cultural evolution changed following his experiences in France in the late 1960s (see Sahlins 1976b).

  3. 3.

    Ingold is the only anthropologist who contributed an essay to the DST compendium Cycles of Contingency (Oyama et al. 2001).

  4. 4.

    So-called “processual archaeology” emerged in the 1960s and is closely associated with the work of Lewis Binford (1962). It encompasses a variety of different approaches, but “all share a common processual orientation grounded in cultural evolutionary theory and a systemic view of culture” based on the structuralism of Claude Lévi-Strauss (Preucel 2010, 94). “Post-processual archaeology” encompasses a variety of different approaches sharing “a common dissatisfaction with the scientistic approach of much of processual archaeology, particularly its focus on positivism and general laws of human behavior. In its place they adopt hermeneutic methods and emphasize the social salience of ideology and power,” commenting, “as an empirical social science which privileges material culture, archaeology retains a strong modernist core and resists full colonization by poststructuralism and postmodernism” (Preucel 2010, 123).

  5. 5.

    A term he coined (Preucel 2010, 126).

References

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. Writing against culture. In Recapturing anthropology, ed. Richard Fox, 137–162. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun, Ashish Chadha, Ian Hodder, Trinity Jackman, and Chris Witmore. 2001. The globalization of archaeology and heritage: A discussion with Arjun Appadurai. Journal of Social Archaeology 1: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biersack, Aletta. 2006. Reimagining political ecology: Culture/power/history/nature. In Reimagining political ecology, ed. Aletta Biersack and James B. Greenberg, 3–40. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, Lewis R. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 11: 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, Nicole. 2008. Material cultures, material minds: The impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Robert, and Peter J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, Napoleon, and Timothy Asch. 1975. The Ax Fight. Watertown: Documentary Educational Resources (distributor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. Gordon. 1951. Man makes himself. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1988. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, William H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, Agustín. 2009. Evolution of human behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, Agustín, Matthew A. Wyczalkowski, and Katherine C. MacKinnon. 2010. Niche construction through cooperation: A nonlinear dynamics contribution to modeling facets of the evolutionary history in the genus Homo. Current Anthropology 51: 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Agricultural involution. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, Alex. 2006. Making the Ipili feasible: Imagining global and local actors at the Porgera gold mine, Enga Province, Papua New Guinea. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Alan H., and Thomas L. Leatherman (eds.). 1998. Building a new biocultural synthesis: Political-economic perspectives on human biology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Kristen, J.F. O’Connell, and Nicholas G. Blurton Jones. 2003. Human life histories: Primate trade-offs, grandmothering socioecology, and the fossil record. In Primate life histories and socioecology, ed. Peter M. Kappeler and Michael E. Pereira, 204–227. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, Ian. 1999. The archaeological process: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, Ian. 2012. Entangled. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 1990. An anthropologist looks at biology. Man (N.S.) 25: 208–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2007. Lines: A brief history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, Eva, and Marion J. Lamb. 2005. Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottak, Conrad P. [1999] 2006. The new ecological anthropology. In The environment in anthropology, ed. Nora Haenn and Richard Wilk, 40–52. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1988. The politics of explanation: An alternative. In Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge, ed. Steve Woolgar, 155–176. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2010. On the modern cult of the factish gods. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2011. Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. International Journal of Communication 5: 796–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Jonathan. 2009. Why I am not a scientist: Anthropology and modern knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCay, Bonnie J. 2008. An intellectual history of ecological anthropology. In Against the grain: The Vayda tradition in human ecology and ecological anthropology, ed. Bradley B. Walters, Bonnie J. McCay, Paige West, and Susan Lees, 11–26. Lanham: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Emilio F. 1990. Ecosystem ecology in biology and anthropology: A critical assessment. In The ecosystem approach in anthropology: From concept to practice, ed. Emilio F. Moran, 3–40. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1963. Ancient society. Cleveland: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F. John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan. 2000. Evolution’s eye: A systems view of the biology-culture divide. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan, Paul E. Griffiths, and Russell D. Gray (eds.). 2001. Cycles of contingency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preucel, Robert W. 2010. Archaeological semiotics. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A. [1968] 1984. Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people, enlarged ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A. 1971. Nature, culture, and ecological anthropology. In Man, culture, and society, ed. Harry L. Shapiro, 237–268. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, Peter, and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by genes alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall D. 1976a. The use and abuse of biology: An anthropological critique of sociobiology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall D. 1976b. Culture and practical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall D., and Elman R. Service (eds.). 1960. Evolution and culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Emily. 2009. Resolving the anti-antievolutionism dilemma: A brief for relational evolutionary thinking in anthropology. American Anthropologist 111: 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Meaning in anthropology, ed. Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, Michael. 1985. The functional stratification of language and ontogenesis. In Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, ed. James V. Wertsch, 205–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. 2006. Scandalous knowledge: Science, truth and the human. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, Julian H. 1955. Theory of culture change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Niko. 1963. On the aims and methods of ethology. Zeitscrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 2002. Anthropology and the savage slot: The poetics and politics of otherness. In Recapturing anthropology, ed. Richard Fox, 17–44. Santa Fe: SAR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1958. Primitive culture. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda, Andrew P. 2009. Explaining human actions and environmental changes. Lanham: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The modern-world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, Bradley B., and Bonnie J. McCay. 2008. Introduction. In Against the grain: The Vayda tradition in human ecology and ecological anthropology, ed. Bradley B. Walters, Bonnie J. McCay, Paige West, and Susan Lees, 1–10. Lanham: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Paige. 2006. Conservation is our government now: The politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, Mary Jane. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Leslie. 1949. The science of culture. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric R. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Gillian Barker, Eric Desjardins, and Trevor Pearce for inviting me to present an earlier version of this paper at the 2010 ISHPSSB Off-Year Workshop, Integrating Complexity: Environment and History, at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, October 7–10, 2010. I benefited greatly from their feedback and that of other conference participants. Robert Lavenda and Daniel Lavenda provided helpful observations as I revised the paper for publication. Final responsibility for the views expressed, however, rests solely with me.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily A. Schultz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schultz, E.A. (2014). New Perspectives on Organism-Environment Interactions in Anthropology. In: Barker, G., Desjardins, E., Pearce, T. (eds) Entangled Life. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7067-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics