Skip to main content

Introduction: Perspectives on Entangled Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1244 Accesses

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 4))

Abstract

Despite burgeoning interest in new and more complex accounts of the organism-environment dyad, biologists and philosophers of biology have paid little attention to the history of these ideas and to their broader deployment in the social sciences and in other disciplines outside biology. Even in biology and philosophy of biology, detailed conceptual models of the organism-environment relationship are still lacking. This volume is designed to fill these lacunae by providing the first multidisciplinary discussion of the topic of organism-environment interaction. It brings together scholars from history, philosophy, psychology, anthropology, medicine, and biology to discuss the common focus of their work: entangled life, or the complex interaction of organisms and environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It collects several papers presented in the “Organism-Environment Interaction: Past, Present, and Future” section of the Integrating Complexity: Environment and History conference at Western University, 7–10 October 2010. The conference was the off-year workshop of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology, and was funded by the Rotman Institute of Philosophy and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. For a brief report of the conference, see Pearce (2011b).

References

  • Amundson, Ron. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of evo-devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Roger G. 1968. Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Gillian. 2008. Biological levers and extended adaptationism. Biology and Philosophy 23: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J.T. 1982. Evolution and development: Report of the Dahlem workshop on evolution and development, Berlin 1981, May 10–15. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington, Kim, James E. Byers, William G. Wilson, and Alan Hastings. 2007. Ecosystem engineers: From plants to protists. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1963. Agricultural involution: The processes of ecological change in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2000. Niche construction in biological and philosophical theories.Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2001. Organism, environment, and dialectics. In Thinking about evolution: Historical, philosophical, and political perspectives, ed. Rama S. Singh, Costas B. Krimbas, Diane B. Paul, and John Beatty, 253–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Paul E. 2005. Review of ‘Niche construction’. Biology and Philosophy 20: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred D. 2007. Does history recapitulate itself? Epistemological reflections on the origins of evolutionary developmental biology. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 13–33. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, Manfred D., and Jane Maienschein. 2007. From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Roger. 1980. Evolutionary theory under fire. Science 210: 883–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, Richard C. 1978. Adaptation. Scientific American 239: 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, Helen E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Alan C. 2008. Explaining evolutionary innovations and novelties: Criteria of explanatory adequacy and epistemological prerequisites. Philosophy of Science 75: 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1978. Evolution. Scientific American 239: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Sandra D. 2009. Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gerd. 2007. Six memos for evo-devo. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 499–524. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F. John. 1988. Niche-constructing phenotypes. In The role of behavior in evolution, ed. H.C. Plotkin, 73–132. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F. John, Kevin N. Laland, and Marcus W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, Samir. 2005. On niche construction and extended evolutionary theory. Biology and Philosophy 20: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okruhlik, Kathleen. 1994. Gender and the biological sciences. In Biology & society: Reflections on methodology, ed. Mohan Matthen and R.X. Ware, 21–42. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Trevor. 2011a. Ecosystem engineering, experiment, and evolution. Biology and Philosophy 26: 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Trevor. 2011b. Meeting report: Fourth ISHPSSB off-year workshop. Biology and Philosophy 26: 315–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raff, Rudolf A., and Alan C. Love. 2004. Kowalevsky, comparative evolutionary embryology, and the intellectual lineage of evo-devo. Journal of Experimental Zoology B 302: 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A. 1968. Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, Kim. 2001. Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution, ed. Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths, and Russell D. Gray, 333–349. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, Kim. 2005. Made by each other: Organisms and their environment. Biology and Philosophy 20: 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Günter P. 2007. The current state and the future of developmental evolution. In From embryology to evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, 525–545. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, Alison. 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: Recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57: 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This collection grew out of a conference held in 2010 at Western University, entitled “Integrating Complexity: Environment and History.” The conference was made possible by the generous support of Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Rotman Institute of Philosophy, and by the institutional sponsorship and assistance of the International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB). We thank these bodies cordially for their support. Thanks are also due to the many members of Western University’s Department of Philosophy who helped to organize and run the conference, and the even larger number of philosophers, historians, and natural and social scientists whose participation made it a success. We wish there had been room in this volume to include many more of the stimulating papers that were presented at the conference. Finally, we are grateful to series co-editor Philippe Huneman and an anonymous reviewer for insightful suggestions, to David Isaac for editorial assistance, and to Springer’s Ties Nijssen and Christi Lue for thoughtful editing and a swift and easy publication process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Barker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barker, G., Desjardins, E., Pearce, T. (2014). Introduction: Perspectives on Entangled Life. In: Barker, G., Desjardins, E., Pearce, T. (eds) Entangled Life. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7067-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics