Abstract
The laboratory, machines, and research of William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson in St. Louis, Missouri, are discussed. Masters, an obstetrician and gynecologist at Washington University specializing in infertility, began a research project on sexual physiology in the 1950s as a means to understanding better the relationship between sexual behavior and fertility. With the assistance of Johnson and laboratory technicians, Masters conducted research into the anatomy and physiology of human sexual response by using multiple machines in, on, and around the bodies of single subjects or couples. Those machines included a penis-camera, which filmed inside a woman’s vagina as she masturbated with it. Masters and Johnson published their results in academic journals before publishing a compilation of them in Human Sexual Response (1966). Their best-known finding was the four-stage response cycle, outlining the four steps that women’s and men’s bodies went through in a sexual experience: excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. The main difference they found between men and women was that women could have multiple orgasms without resolution, and men could not. Masters and Johnson used their machine-based results as evidence to argue that heterosexual married couples could aim for parity in their sexual gratification. However, homosexual men and women, along with radical feminists, read their work as evidence for sexual liberation and satisfaction outside of marriage as well. More conservative commentators objected that Masters and Johnson’s research took the mystery out of sex. Human Sexual Response cemented the importance of using machines in sex research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The penis-camera was discarded at some point in the early 1970s after Masters and Johnson concluded their physiological research (Morrow 2008). There are no known images of it.
References
Allyn, D. 2000. Make love, not war: The sexual revolution; an unfettered history. Boston: Little, Brown.
Brecher, R., and E. Brecher (eds.). 1966. An analysis of Human Sexual Response. Boston: Little, Brown.
Brown, M.P. 2000. Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.
Bullough, V.L. 1994. Science in the bedroom: A history of sex research. New York: Basic Books.
Cartwright, L. 1995. Screening the body: Tracing medicine’s visual culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chernow, C., and V.E. Johnson. 1970. “To Be Filed” folder 2, box 5, Virginia Johnson Masters Collection. Bloomington, Indiana, USA: Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction Inc.
Davidson, J.O., and D. Layder. 1994. Methods, sex, and madness. London: Routledge.
D’Emilio, J., and E.B. Freedman. 1988. Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. New York: Harper & Row.
van Dijck, J. 2005. The transparent body: A cultural analysis of medical imaging. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Ericksen, J.A., and S.A. Steffen. 1999. Kiss and tell: Surveying sex in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Faludi, S. 2013. Death of a revolutionary. New Yorker (15 Apr 2013). http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/04/15/130415fa_fact_faludi. Accessed 13 Apr 2013.
Farber, L.H. 1966. I’m sorry, dear. In An analysis of human sexual response, ed. R. Brecher, and E. Brecher, 291–318. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1992. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Firestone, S. 1970. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Morrow.
Firestone, S., et al. 1968. Notes from the first year. New York Radical Women, New York. http://library.duke.edu/rubenstein/scriptorium/wlm/notes. Accessed 13 Apr 2013.
Friedan, B. 1963. The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.
Freud, S. 1910. Drei abhandlungen zur sexual theorie [Three essays on the theory of sexuality]. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.
Gerhard, J. 2001. Desiring revolution: Second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press.
Greer, G. 1970. The female eunuch. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Heidenry, J. 1997. What wild ecstasy: The rise and fall of the sexual revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Irvine, J.M. 2005. Disorders of desire: Sexuality and gender in modern American sexology. Rev ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kinsey, A.C., W.B. Pomeroy, and C.E. Martin. 1948. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Kinsey, A.C., et al. 1953. Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Koedt, A. 1970. The myth of the vaginal orgasm. http://www.uic.edu/orgs/cwluherstory/CWLUArchive/vaginalmyth.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Trans: D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
Maier, T. 2009. Masters of sex: William Masters and Virginia Johnson, the couple who taught America how to love. New York: Basic Books.
Mailer, N. 1971. The prisoner of sex. Boston: Little, Brown.
Maines, R.P. 1999. The technology of orgasm: “Hysteria,” the vibrator, and women’s sexual satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Masters, W.H. 1959. The sexual response cycle of the human female: II. Vaginal lubrication. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 83: 301–317. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb40904.x.
Masters, W.H. 1960. The sexual response cycle of the human female: I. Gross anatomic considerations. Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics, and Gynecology 68(1): 57–72.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1961a. The physiology of the vaginal reproductive function. Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics, and Gynecology 69(2): 105–120.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1961b. The artificial vagina: Anatomic, physiologic, psychosexual function. Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics, and Gynecology 69(3): 192–212.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1962. The sexual response cycle of the human female: III. The clitoris: Anatomic and clinical considerations. Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics, and Gynecology 70(5): 248–257.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1963a. Clitoris: An anatomic baseline for behavioral investigation. In Determinants of human sexual behavior. Charles C. Thomas, ed. G. Winokur, 44–51. Illinois: Springfield.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1963b. Sexual response of the human male: I. Gross anatomic considerations. Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, 71(2): 85–95.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1964. Sexual response: Part II, anatomy and physiology. In Human reproduction and sexual behavior, ed. C.W. Lloyd, 462–473. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1965. Sexual response cycles of the human male and female: Comparative anatomy and physiology. In Sex and behavior, ed. F.A. Beach, 512–534. New York: Wiley.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1966. Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown.
Masters, W.H., and V.E. Johnson. 1970. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Millet, K. 1970. Sexual politics. New York: Ballantine.
Morrow, R. 2008. Sex research and sex therapy: A sociological analysis of Masters and Johnson. New York: Routledge.
Penley, C., and A. Ross (eds.). 1991. Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Petrowski, M., and V.E. Johnson. 1975. “To Be Filed” folder 2, box 5, Virginia Johnson Masters Collection. Indiana, USA: Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction Inc., Bloomington.
Reumann, M.G. 2005. American sexual character: Sex, gender, and national identity in the Kinsey reports. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Robinson, P. 1976. The modernization of sex: Havelock Ellis, Alfred Kinsey, William Masters, and Virginia Johnson. New York: Harper & Row.
Ross, A. 1991. Hacking away at the counterculture. In Technoculture, ed. C. Penley, and A. Ross, 107–134. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schiebinger, L. 2004. Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science, New ed. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Tiefer, L. 1995. Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Treichler, P.A., Cartwright L., and Penley, C. 1998. Introduction. In The visible woman: Imaging technologies, gender, and science, ed. P.A. Treichler, L. Cartwright, and C. Penley, 1–18. New York: New York University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drucker, D.J. (2014). The Couples Laboratory and the Penis-Camera: Seeking the Source of Orgasm. In: The Machines of Sex Research. SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7064-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7064-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7063-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7064-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)