Abstract
Let’s imagine, in the city of Wan Zhou, in the Western parts of China, another large city is developing at an unimaginable pace. According to the Chinese national governmental planning agency, this prospective metropolis needs to quadruple in size over the next decades. One of the areas the governments had laid its eyes on is Yong-Xin district, some 15 km outside the central city and currently in use as poor agricultural land, farmed by farming families that have lived in the area for thousands of years. Current living circumstances in the area are poor. People eat sided diets and die at relatively young age. The way farming operates in the area emits a high level of carbon due to its predominant use of fossil resources. The area is vulnerable for heat waves, droughts and floods as well as bushfires. The local authorities, in conjunction with a national renowned project developer, have conceived a preliminary design for the area.
In this design a series of high-rise apartment buildings are proposed along with compact residential mid-end low-rise buildings. The number of dwellings proposed is 2,500 and are accompanied with schools, a shopping mall, community centres and offices. This high level program will lead to a complete makeover in the area and this came as a surprise to the current inhabitants. They experienced the propositions as a short-term intervention, changing the area from agricultural to urban, without the notice of long-term change, such as the energy provision, climatic impacts and socio-economic developments. Protests rose amongst the current inhabitants of the area and their powerless position was even used by artist Liu Bolin in his work ‘Invisible Man’. This was the reason for Mr. Xu to step up and ask for an adjusted design process in which more space was incorporated for collaborative future visioning, which explores the longer-term desires of the current and future community. The developer, after deliberations with the National government and local authorities, proposed to organise a design charrette, a way of designing a sustainable future for the area together with a larger group of stakeholders. Mr. Xu and his fellow community members were wary at first, but soon they understood the advantages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Team Xu consists of Mr Xu, fellow community members, representatives from government and the developer and academic experts in the field of design, planning, organisation of charrettes and sustainability.
References
Aalbers, C. B. E. M., & Jonkhof, J. F. (2003). Planning met principes;/S2N, de strategie van de twee netwerken revisited/planning on principle; S2N, the strategy of the two networks revisited. Boxtel: Aeneas.
Clune, S. (2012). Sustainability appraisal of design-led responses. Scoping appraisal report 2: Sea Lake Charrette. Melbourne: RMIT University.
Clune, S., & Hunter, S. (2011). Sustainability appraisal of design-led responses. Scoping appraisal report 1: Bendigo Charrette. Melbourne: RMIT University.
Clune, S., & Hunter, S. (2012). Methodology for the sustainability appraisal of design-led responses to climate adaptation. Melbourne: RMIT University.
Clune, S., Roggema, R., Horne, R., Hunter, S., Jones, R., Martin, J., & Werner, J. (2012). Design-led decision support for regional climate adaptation (Final report, Draft 1.0). Melbourne: RMIT University.
Condon, P. M. (2008). Design charrettes for sustainable communities. Washington, DC/Covelo/London: Island Press.
Lennertz, B., & Lutzenhiser, A. (2006). The charrette handbook. The essential guide for accelerated collaborative community planning. Chicago: The American Planning Association.
Postrel, V. (1998). The future and its enemies: The growing conflict over creativity, enterprise, and progress. New York: Free Press.
Roggema, R., & Boneschansker, O. (2010). INCREASE II, Final report of the second international conference on renewable energy approaches for the spatial environment; Towards a zero fossil energy region in 2050. Groningen: UIBE and Province of Groningen.
Roggema, R., & Stremke, S. (2012). Networks as the driving force for climate design. In R. Roggema (Ed.), Swarming landscapes, the art of designing for climate adaptation. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.
Roggema, R., Jones, R., Soh, A., Clune, S., Hunter, S., Barilla, A., Cai, Z., Tian, J., & Walsh, J. (2011). City of greater Bendigo design charrette I, the report. Melbourne: RMIT University, La Trobe University, Victoria University and VCCCAR.
Roggema, R., Jones, R., Clune, S., & Lindenbergh, D. (2012). Sea Lake Charrette, dancing under the stars. Melbourne: RMIT University, La Trobe University, Victoria University and VCCCAR.
Timmermans, W., Jonkhof, J. F., & Tjallingii, S. P. (2002). Strategie van de twee netwerken. In R. E. Roggema, A. J. M. Schreuders, M. O. Janssen, H. Hofstra, E. J. Vuijk, & W. Timmermans (Eds.), Handboek ruimtelijke ordening en milieu; editie 2002/2003 (pp. 185–198). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
Tjallingii, S. P. (1995). Ecopolis, strategies for ecologically sound urban development. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Tjallingii, S. P. (2000). Ecology on the edge: Landscape and ecology between town and country. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 103–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roggema, R. (2014). The Charrette of Mr. Xu. In: Roggema, R. (eds) The Design Charrette. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7030-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7031-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)