Skip to main content

McRural, No Rural or What Rural? – Some Reflections on Rural Reconfiguration Processes Based on the Promotion of Schist Villages Network, Portugal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping Rural Areas in Europe

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 107))

Abstract

This chapter debates the future of remote rural areas in Portugal, taking into account the current processes of reconfiguration based on the revalorisation of those areas mainly as ‘consumable’ places. Tourism and related activities are the most relevant ways through which rural territories are being consumed. These processes are, to a certain extent, the main driving forces of the transformations taking place in rural areas, not only in material terms but also in symbolic terms. The touristic promotion of the countryside is often based in ‘global’ images rather than in local features, apparently inducing a process of ‘McRuralisation’. Based on the content analysis of promotional materials presented in the website of the Schist Villages Network, Portugal, we intend to reveal the main features used to promote and sell this territory, and its global and/or local character, as well as to discuss the potential consequences in terms of rural reconfiguration paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although it can be seen that there is much theoretical and methodological diversity regarding the analysis of changes occurring in rural areas in the Western world, there is a broad consensus as to the universality and direction of such alterations (e.g. Mormont 1994; Ramos-Real 1995; Jollivet 1997).

  2. 2.

    Without wishing to deny the importance of the concept of the multifunctionality of rural areas and their effective and successful operationalisation, in some cases, we consider it worthwhile to question the reasons for the emergence of a multifunctional rural space from the mid-1980s onwards (ECC 1988), in a context in which there is a generalised view of the rural world as a place without autonomous productive functions and, at the same time, a notion of the revaluation of the cultural, environmental and social heritage of this same world (Nave 2003). The rural world’s set identity and monofunctionality appear to be giving way to a certain functional ‘schizophrenia’, though a good part of it does not possess the necessary instruments and abilities to respond.

  3. 3.

    This metaphor arose most clearly in the context of a short research project, begun in 2008 and financed by the National Research Council (CNR), Italy. This project, which focused on the images of the countryside conveyed and sold by tourist promoters, revealed a homogeneity and massification of symbols (material and immaterial) in supply, demand and consumption, strongly suggesting a global representation of the countryside (Figueiredo and Raschi 2012).

  4. 4.

    Some authors have indeed defined the current processes of globalisation as the ‘McDonaldisation’ of the world (e.g. Barber 1992, 1995).

  5. 5.

    Since this is an attribute of most Western societies, such imaginary and strategies may raise greater challenges and have increased impacts on Southern European societies due to the characteristics of their rural areas, particularly of those places which we earlier defined as remote or peripheral.

  6. 6.

    In the previous section, we have already mentioned the ‘disappearance’ of the countryside as an object of study, assumed by many social scientists to have been diluted into the urban. However, Cloke (2006) states that the last decade has witnessed an ‘enthusiastic’ re-emergence of rural studies.

  7. 7.

    Estado Novo was the designation of the dictatorship period in Portugal (1926–1974). The ideological exploitation mentioned, generically, consists of glorifying the countryside as an area in which the ‘noblest’ of man’s activities – agriculture – is developed.

  8. 8.

    Emphasis added by the author. The author is also responsible for the translation of this and the following excerpts used in the text.

  9. 9.

    The rivers Zêzere and Alva, crossing the territory, are, in fact, remarkable natural features of the area.

References

  • Axford, B. (2000). Globalization. In A. Halcli, G. Browning, & F. Webster (Eds.), Understanding contemporary society (pp. 238–251). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1992, March). Jihad vs McWorld. Atlantic Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs McWorld – How globalism and tribalism are reshaping the world. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 149–160). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R., & Hall, M. (1998). Image and reimaging of rural areas. In C. Richard Butler, M. Hall, & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Tourism and recreation in rural areas (pp. 115–122). Chichester: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 18–27). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, J. (2011). Aldeias de Xisto – o Turismo como Futuro para as Áreas Rurais. Unpublished master thesis, Faculty of Architecture, University of Porto, Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECC. (1988). The future of rural society (Bulletin of the European Communities, Vol. 4/88). Brussels: European Communities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, E. (2003a). Um Rural para Viver, Outro para Visitar – o Ambiente nas Estratégias de Desenvolvimento para as Áreas Rurais. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Aveiro, Aveiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, E. (2003b). Quantas mais ‘aldeias típicas’ conseguimos suportar? Algumas reflexões a propósito do turismo como instrumento de desenvolvimento local em meio rural. In Turismo em Espaços Rurais e Naturais, orgs. Orlando Simões and Artur Cristóvão (pp. 85–81). Coimbra: IPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, E. (2008). Imagine there’s no rural – The transformation of rural spaces into places of nature conservation in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, E. (2009). Ser rural ou parecer rural? Representações rurais e urbanas do ambiente, do desenvolvimento e da ruralidade. In Os Territórios de Baixa Densidade em Tempos de Mudança (coords. F. Oliveira Baptista, Rui Jacinto, & Teresa Mendes, pp. 87–103). Proença-a-Nova: CCVF/CMPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, E., & Raschi, A. (2012). Immersed in green? Reconfiguring the Italian countryside through rural tourism promotional materials. In K. Hyde, C. Ryan, & A. Woodside (Eds.), Field guide for case study research in tourism, hospitality and leisure (pp. 17–44). Bingley: Emerald Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, S. (2000). Rural areas in the information society: Diminishing distance or increasing learning capacity? Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (1993). Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (1995). Talking about rurality: Social representations of the rural as expressed by residents of six English parishes. Journal of Rural Studies, 11, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (1996). Transnational connections. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jollivet, M. (1997). Des campagnes paysannes au rural ‘vert’: naissance d’une ruralité postindustriel. In M. Jollivet (Ed.), Vers un Rural Postindustriel – Rural et Environnement en Huit Pays Européens (pp. 77–126). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenholz, E. (2004). ‘Management of demand’ as a tool in sustainable tourist destination development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12(5), 388–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leger, D., & Hervieu, B. (1985). La nature des néo-ruraux. In A. Cadoret (Ed.), Protection de la nature: Histoire et Idéologie – de la Nature à l’Environnement (pp. 152–160). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansinho, M. I., & Schmidt, L. (1997). Réinventer le rural par l’environnement’. In M. Jollivet (Ed.), Vers un Rural Postindustriel – Rural et Environnement en Huit Pays Européens (pp. 261–308). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (2008). Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1990). Who is rural? Or how to be rural? Towards a sociology of the rural. In T. Marsden, P. Lowe, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Rural restructuring – Global processes and their responses (pp. 21–44). London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1994). La agricultura en el espacio rural europeo. Agricultura y Sociedad, 71, 17–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., & Pratt, A. (1997). From the power of topography to the topography of power – A discourse on strange ruralities. In P. Cloke & J. Little (Eds.), Contested countryside cultures – Otherness, marginalization and rurality (pp. 51–69). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave, J. G. (2003). O rural e os seus duplos. In P. Chão (Ed.), José Portela and João Caldas (pp. 129–148). Oeiras: Celta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Baptista, F. (1993). Agricultura, Espaço e Sociedade Rural. Coimbra: Fora do Texto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Baptista, F. (1996). Declínio de um tempo longo. In O Voo do Arado (coord. Joaquim Pais de Brito, pp. 35–75). Lisbon: Dom Quixote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Baptista, F. (2004). Rural e Agricultura. Lecture given at the II Congresso de Estudos Rurais – Espaços Rurais Periféricos. Angra do Heroísmo: University of the Azores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Baptista, F. (2006). O rural depois da agricultura. In M. L. Fonseca (Ed.), Desenvolvimento e Território – Espaços Rurais Pós-agrícolas e os Novos Lugares de Turismo e Lazer (pp. 85–100). Lisbon: Centro de Estudos Geográficos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Fish, R., & Agg, J. (2001). Putting together ruralities: Towards a symbolic analysis of rurality in the British mass media. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picon, B. (1992). Le citoyen, le savant, le journaliste et le politique. In M. Jollivet (Ed.), Sciences de la Nature, Sciences de la Société – les Passeurs de Frontiéres (pp. 41–53). Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, J. (2003). Portugal-chão: que futuro futurível? In J. Portela & J. Caldas (Eds.), Portugal Chão (pp. 3–33). Oeiras: Celta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, B. (2008). Rede do património do xisto: A linguagem universal dos artesãos do património. Revista Aldeias de Xisto, 4 – série II, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Real, E. (1995). De la crisis a la regeneración rural. In SPER (Ed.), Proceedings of the III Colóquio Hispano-Português de Estudos Rurais (pp. 125–149). Lisbon: SPER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M., & Woodgate, G. (1994). Sociology and the environment: Discordant discourse? In M. Redclift & T. Benton (Eds.), Social theory and the global environment (pp. 51–66). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rolo, J. (1996). Imagens de meio século da agricultura portuguesa. In O Voo do Arado (coord. Joaquim Pais de Brito, pp. 77–160). Lisbon: Dom Quixote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. (2007). A procura do Turismo em Espaço Rural. Etnográfica, 11(1), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. (2009). Casas no Campo. Etnografia do Turismo Rural em Portugal. Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: Globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4), 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., & DeSantis, R. (2005). Usability issues in city tourism website design: A content analysis. In 2005 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference Proceedings, IEEE (pp. 789–796).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabete Figueiredo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Figueiredo, E. (2013). McRural, No Rural or What Rural? – Some Reflections on Rural Reconfiguration Processes Based on the Promotion of Schist Villages Network, Portugal. In: Silva, L., Figueiredo, E. (eds) Shaping Rural Areas in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 107. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6796-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics