Abstract
Language is a primary medium of social behavior and, as such, deserves center stage in the panoply of social psychological topics. This chapter explores the social psychology of language by reviewing scholarship that highlights how people use language to perform social actions. This approach goes against a tradition that sees spoken language primarily in terms of the conduit metaphor or only as a vehicle for communication. The authors review speech act theory (in philosophy) and pose the “mapping problem” (Levinson, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983) or how actions are linked to particular utterances. They then review different perspectives including sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, Goffmanian sociology, discursive psychology, and ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Discussion includes, for each of these perspectives, methodological procedures, including approaches to the relation between talk and social structure. Ever more realms of language use related to social psychology are coming under the microscope and set an agenda for further study.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
A formerly influential variant of the communicational view of language is the famous Sapir-Whorf, or linguistic relativity, hypothesis. Benjamin Whorf, a student of the anthropologist Edward Sapir, studied the languages of American Indians and other groups, and argued that these languages conditioned the members’ life experiences. The Whorfian hypothesis suggests an iconic relation between language and thought—i.e., that language determines thought. Early on, Lennenberg (1953) and Brown (1958) pointed out the logical flaws in this proposition. For a more recent critique, see Pinker (1994: Chapter 3).
- 2.
The source here is a transcript entitled “Virginia,” and the utterance is on page 27 at lines 27–28.
- 3.
For a critical view of sociolinguistics from a sociological perspective, see Williams (1992).
- 4.
Grimshaw (1974, p. 80) reviews the early literature comprehensively and suggests that sociolinguistics is a “hybrid discipline” that is “largely atheoretical.”
- 5.
For a recent conversation analytic approach to emotion and emotion display in talk, see Peräkylä and Sorjonen (2012).
- 6.
- 7.
References
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic transitions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409–426.
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk. London: Sage.
Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2012). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell &T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, D. (1983). Political anatomy of the body. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
Auer, P. (Ed.). (1999). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge.
Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Baugh, J. (1999). Out of the mouths of slaves. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bereiter, C., & Engelmann, S. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bereiter, C., Engelman, S., Osborn, J., & Reidford, P. A. (1966). An academically oriented pre-school for culturally deprived children. In F. M. Hechinger (Ed.), Pre-school education today: New approaches to teaching three-, four-, and five-year olds (pp. 105–135). New York: Doubleday.
Bernstein, B. (1961). Social structure, language and learning. Educational Research, 3, 163–176.
Bernstein, B. (1972). A sociolinguistic approach to socialization: With some reference to educability. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 465–511). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Breitborde, L. B. (1983). Levels of analysis in sociolinguistic explanation: Bilingual code switching, social relations, and domain theory. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 39, 5–43.
Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.
Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.
Buttny, R. (1997). Reported speech in talking race on campus. Human Communication Research, 23(4), 477–506.
Button, G. (1987). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 160–171.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chambers, J. K. (2008). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cicourel, A. V. (1981). Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179–231). New York: Random House.
Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35(4), 474–492.
Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T. (2012). Conversation analysis. In A. Bryman & M. Hardy (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 119–134). London: Routledge.
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Corsaro, W. A. (1979). Young children’s conception of status and role. Sociology of Education, 55, 160–177.
Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures. Social Psychological Quarterly, 55, 160–177.
Corsaro, W. A. (1996). Transitions in early childhood: The promise of comparative, longitudinal ethnography. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 419–456). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Danet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process. Law and Society Review, 14, 445–564.
de Saussure, F. (2011[1916]). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Duneier, M., & Molotch, H. (1999). Talking city trouble: Interactional vandalism, social inequality, and the ‘urban interaction problem’. The American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1263–1295.
Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Edwards, D. (1995). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(4), 319–350.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Edwards, J. (1979). Language and disadvantage. London: Arnold.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Emirbayer, M., & Maynard, D. W. (2011). Pragmatism and ethnomethodology. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 221–261.
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Firth, J. R. (1935). The techniques of semantics. Transactions of the Philological Society, 7, 36–72.
Fisher, S. (1983). Doctor talk/patient talk: How treatment decisions are negotiated in doctor-patient communication. In S. Fisher & A. D. Todd (Eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication (pp. 135–157). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Ford, C. (2008). Women speaking up: Getting and using turns in workplace meetings. New York: Palgrave.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
Gardner, C. B. (1989). Analyzing gender in public places: Rethinking Goffman’s vision of everyday life. The American Sociologist, 20(1), 42–56.
Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. D. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Gee, J. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Gibson, D. (2010). Marking the turn: Obligation, engagement, and alienation in group discussions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 132–151.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giles, H., & Robinson, W. P. (1990). Prologue. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 1–8). New York: Wiley.
Gill, V. T. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients’ explanations for illness and doctors’ responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 342–360.
Gill, V. T., & Roberts, F. (2012). Conversation analysis in medicine. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 575–592). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25, 1–29.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 115–130.
Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003). Conversation and brain damage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2007a). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 57–73.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive-response sequences. Talk and Text, 26(4/5), 513–541.
Goodwin, M. H. (2007b). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 353–375.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 67, 53–59.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & N. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Speech acts, Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic.
Grimshaw, A. (1989). Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Grimshaw, A. D. (1974). Sociolinguistics. In I. d. S. Pool & W. Schramm (Eds.), Handbook of communication (pp. 49–92). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Introduction. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 1–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.
Harré, R. (1986). An outline of the social constructionist viewpoint. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 2–14). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 113–125.
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 216–241.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29.
Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52.
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.
Heritage, J., Robinson, J., Elliott, M., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1429–1433.
Hertzler, J. O. (1965). A sociology of language. New York: Random House.
Hewitt, J. P., & Shulman, D. (2011). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Holtgraves, T. (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 15–24.
House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177.
Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1953). Persuasion and communication. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jefferson, G. (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 34, 1–12.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Key, M. R. (1972). Linguistic behavior of male and female. Linguistics, 88, 15–31.
Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498.
Kitzinger, C. (2008). Conversation analysis: Technical matters for gender research. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 119–138). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Kitzinger, C. (2012). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.
Labov, W. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
Land, V., & Kitzinger, C. (2011). Categories in talk-in-interaction: Gendering speaker and recipient. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lennenberg, E. H. (1953). Cognition and ethnolinguistics. Language, 29, 463–471.
Lerner, G. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 167–177.
Lerner, G. H. (1996). Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 303–321.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lutfey, K., & Maynard, D. W. (1998). Bad news in oncology: How physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 321–341.
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive societies. In C. K. Ogden & J. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 451–510). London: Kegan Paul.
Manning, P., & Ray, G. (1993). Shyness, self-confidence, and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 178–192.
Manzo, J. (1996). Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliverations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 107–125.
Marlaire, C. L., & Maynard, D. W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63, 83–101.
Maynard, D. W. (1984). Inside plea bargaining: The language of negotiation. New York: Plenum.
Maynard, D. W. (1987). Language and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), v–vi.
Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maynard, D. W. (2005). Social actions, gestalt coherence, and designations of disability: Lessons from and about autism. Social Problems, 52, 499–524.
Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.
Maynard, D. W., Freese, J., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2010). Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (inter)action. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 791–814.
Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C., & Zouwen, H. v. d. (Eds.). (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Maynard, D. W., & Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational testing. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202.
Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301–316.
McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275.
McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mehan, H. (1991). The school’s work of sorting students. In D. B. a. D. H. Zimmerman (Ed.), Talk and social structure (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Molotch, H. L., & Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: Discourse, domination and the Watergate hearings. American Sociological Review, 50, 273–288.
Mondada, L. (2012). Garden lessons: Embodied action and joint attention in extended sequences. In H. Nasu & F. C. Waksler (Eds.), Interaction and everyday life: Phenomenological and ethnomethodological essays in honor of George Psathas. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Okamoto, D. G., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Changing the subject: Gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. American Sociological Review, 66, 852–873.
Peräkylä, A. (1995). Aids counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Peräkylä, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 301–320.
Peräkylä, A. (Ed.). (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer.
Phillips, S. (1982). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian reservation. New York: Longman.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Harper Collins.
Pitkin, H. F. (1972). Wittgenstein and justice: On the significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for social and political thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London: Sage.
Potter, J. (2012). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology (Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2011). Recipients designed: Tag-questions and gender. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender (pp. 135–152). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
Rawls, A. W. (1987). The interaction order sui generis: Goffman’s contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory, 5, 136–149.
Rawls, A. W. (2010). Social order as moral order. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 95–122). New York: Springer.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Emotion, affect and conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 330–349). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Fall 1964-spring 1968, Vol. 1). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114.
Schegloff, E. A. (1989). Reflections on language, development and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 139–153). New York: Erlbaum.
Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 44–70). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1295–1345.
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). New York: Academic.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice. London: Sage.
Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Speer, S. A. (2011). On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a ‘real woman’. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender (pp. 155–182). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Speer, S. A. (2012). The interactional organization of self-praise: Epistemics, preference organization, and implications for identity research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 52–79.
Speer, S. A., & Parsons, C. (2006). Gatekeeping gender: Some features of the use of hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. Discourse and Society, 17(6), 785–812.
Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (2011a). An introduction to conversation and gender. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011b). Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T. (2007). Prescribing under pressure: Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stivers, T., & Majid, A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 424–441.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E. (2008). Categories and sequences: Formulating gender in talk-in-interaction. In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Saunston, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 139–157). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Stokoe, E. (2010). ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization, and men’s denials of violence toward women. Discourse and Society, 21(1), 59–82.
Stokoe, E. (2011). ‘Girl–woman–sorry!’: On the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse and Society, 18(3), 337–372.
Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439–460.
Strong, P. (1979). The ceremonial order of the clinic. London: Routledge.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow and Co.
Thorne, B., & Henley, N. (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Turner, J., & Stets, J. E. (2006). Sociological theories of human emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 25–52.
Turowetz, J. J., & Maynard, D. W. (2010). Morality in the social interactional and discursive world of everyday life. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer.
van Dijk, T. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 1–4). London: Academic.
van Dijk, T. (1997a). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. (1997b). The study of discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Waitzkin, H. (1991). The politics of medical encounters: How patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
West, C., & Garcia, A. (1988). Conversational shift work. Social Problems, 35, 550–575.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations with unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1985). Gender, language and discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 103–124). London: Academic.
Whalen, J., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotion in naturally occurring activities: The case of ‘hysteria’ in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141–159.
Whalen, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 172–185.
Whitehead, K. (2009). Categorizing the categorizer: The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 325–342.
Whitehead, K., & Lerner, G. (2009). When are persons ‘white’? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society, 20(5), 613–641.
Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.
Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. New York: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillian.
Wood, L., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 221–238). Chicago: Aldine.
Zimmerman, D. H., & Boden, D. (1991). Structure-in-action: An introduction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maynard, D.W., Turowetz, J. (2013). Language Use and Social Interaction. In: DeLamater, J., Ward, A. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6771-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6772-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)