Skip to main content

Interactionist Perspectives in Social Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The core tradition of symbolic interactionism is presented, including its key concepts, and the history of symbolic interactionism is reviewed, from its beginnings in the works of Adam Smith to those of Erving Goffman and beyond. The special theories and methodologies that comprise several of its leading variants (such as the process, structural, dramaturgical, and postmodern traditions) are considered. The chapter concludes with a consideration of future developments in symbolic interactionism.

This chapter reviews developments in symbolic interactionism, a relatively ancient framework (or perspective) dating back some 250 years. The initiators, early contributors, and current users share (in important degree) elements of that perspective; they also differ significantly in the ways they interpret the propositions that together constitute that framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This school of thought is usually reckoned to include, at minimum and in alphabetical order, Adam Ferguson, David Hume, Frances Hutcheson, Lord Kames, Lord Monboddo, Thomas Reid, Adam Smith, and Dugald Stewart (Schneider, 1967). The social context of their work is discussed in Herman (2001).

  2. 2.

    Smi|th, 1759, p. 260.

  3. 3.

    Smith, 1790 (6th ed.), p. 131. This addition was already put forth in Smith’s letter to

    Gilbert Elliot (Smith, 1987, p. 51).

  4. 4.

    Smith, 1759, p. 254.

  5. 5.

    James, 1890, p. 179.

  6. 6.

    Cooley, 1902, pp. 184–185.

  7. 7.

    Cooley, 1909, p. 30.

  8. 8.

    Park, 1927, p. 738.

  9. 9.

    Thomas & Thomas, 1928, p. 572.

  10. 10.

    The magnitude of that stature is difficult to exaggerate when it had already produced such major SI contributors as Willard Waller (1938), Robert E. Faris (1950), and Leonard Cottrell (1950).

  11. 11.

    G. McCall & Simmons, 1966, pp. 60–61.

  12. 12.

    Sterelny, 2003, p. 172.

  13. 13.

    Turner, 1962, p. 24.

  14. 14.

    Stryker & Vryan, 2003, p. 25.

References

  • Aiken, L. R. (1999). Human differences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1984). The social animal (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (Eds.). (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Boston: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman, C. W., & Secord, P. F. (1962). Liking, selective interaction, and misperception in congruent interpersonal relationships. Sociometry, 25, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. M. (1897). Social and ethical interpretations in mental development. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1964). Personal change in adult life. Sociometry, 27, 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1968). The self and adult socialization. In E. Norbeck, D. Price-Williams, & W. M. McCord (Eds.), The study of personality: An interdisciplinary appraisal (pp. 289–303). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., & Strauss, A. L. (1956). Careers, personality, and adult socialization. The American Journal of Sociology, 62, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., & McCall, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Symbolic interaction and cultural studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. H. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study of the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1980). Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review, 45, 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (Ed.). (1911–1938). Introduction to the handbook of American Indian languages. Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, R. (1961). Speech disorders: Aphasia, apraxia and agnosia. Washington, DC: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brim, O. G., Jr., & Wheeler, S. (1966). Socialization after childhood: Two essays. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brissett, D., & Edgley, C. (Eds.). (1974/1990). Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1039–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J. M. (2009). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J., Smoliar, S. W., & Stefik, M. J. (Eds.). (1994). Contemplating minds: A forum for artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. A. (Ed.). (1968). Socialization and society. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomy, P., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Elaboration, revision, polemic, and progress in the Second Chicago School. In G. A. Fine (Ed.), A second Chicago School? The development of a postwar American sociology (pp. 17–81). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social organization. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, L. S. (1950). Some neglected problems in social psychology. American Sociological Review, 15, 705–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, L. S., & Dymond, R. F. (1949). The empathic responses. Psychiatry, 12, 355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. J. (1958). Self-attitudes and degree of agreement with immediate others. The American Journal of Sociology, 63, 491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1947). Final note on a case of extreme isolation. The American Journal of Sociology, 52, 432–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1983a). Interpretive interactionism. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond methods (pp. 129–140). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1983b). The spaces of postmodernism: Reading Plummer on Blumer. Symbolic Interaction, 13, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1996). The epistemological crisis in the human disciplines: Letting the old do the work of the new. In A. Colby, R. Jessor, & R. A. Shwader (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 127–151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, G. (2010). Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1908). What does pragmatism mean by practical? Journal of Philosophy, 5, 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, R. F. (1949). A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgley, C. (2003). The dramaturgical genre. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 141–172). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R. E. (1950). Social psychology. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In J. M. Suls (Ed.), The self in social perspective (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-awareness: Its nature and development. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (Ed.). (1995). A second Chicago School? The development of a postwar American sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1970). Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. A. (2001). Evolutionary perspectives on the origins of human social institutions. In W. G. Runciman (Ed.), The origin of human social institutions (pp. 171–196). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, W. A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D., & McCarthy, E. D. (Eds.). (1989). The sociology of emotions. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & McBurney, D. H. (2004). Evolutionary psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). (1968). Organizational careers: A sourcebook for theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, B. (1990). Fit for postmodern selfhood. In H. S. Becker & M. M. McCall (Eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies (pp. 215–243). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis in Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1981). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience (Rev. ed.). New York: Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H. (1975). Occupations and the social structure (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. R. (2001). What can interactionism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, A. (2001). How the Scots invented the modern world. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P. (1999). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (1973). Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review, 38, 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. C. (1958). Men and their work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant (Eds.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 632–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. (2006). Charles Horton Cooley: Imagining social reality. Amherst, MA/Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, D., Stone, G. P., & Yoels, W. C. (1977). Being urban: A social psychological view of city life. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasher, A. (1997). Pragmatics: Critical concepts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katovich, M. A., Miller, D. E., & Stewart, R. L. (2003). The Iowa School. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 119–139). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (1998). A theory of linguistic signs (K. Duenwald, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Luce, C. L. (Eds.). (2004). The functional mind: Readings in evolutionary psychology. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, C. A., & Aiello, L. C. (1999). The evolution of social organization. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture (pp. 15–33). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H. (1964a). Major trends in symbolic interaction in the past twenty-five years. The Sociological Quarterly, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H. (1964b). The reference group reconsidered. The Sociological Quarterly, 5, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1992). Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, E. C. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Smith, R. L. (1980). American sociology and pragmatism: Mead, Chicago sociology, and symbolic interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1991). Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindesmith, A. R. (1947). Opiate addictions. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindesmith, A. R., & Strauss, A. L. (1949/1956). Social psychology. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1969). Deviance and identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, L. (1973). A world of strangers. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior (J. Tizard, Trans.). New York: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. M., & Scott, M. B. (1975). The drama of social reality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1997). The objects of selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 2091–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J. (2003). Interaction. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 327–348). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J. (2006). Symbolic interaction. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 1–23). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1966/1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. M., & Wittner, J. (1990). The good news about life history. In H. S. Becker & M. M. McCall (Eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies (pp. 46–89). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation: The organization of meaning in social interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C. (2000). Collective action and perception control theory. In D. Miller (Ed.), Introduction to collective behavior and collective action (2nd ed., pp. 461–465). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C., & Tucker, C. (1972). The classification and ordering of responses to the question ‘Who Am I?’. The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1930). Cooley’s contributions to American social thought. The American Journal of Sociology, 35, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). In C. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, B. N., & Petras, J. W. (1970). The Chicago and Iowa Schools of symbolic interactionism. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior (pp. 3–17). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). The self-fulfilling prophecy. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (Rev. ed.) (pp. 421–436). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. S. (1950). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and methods of ‘The American Soldier’ (pp. 40–105). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messinger, S. E., & Towne, R. D. (1962). Life as theater: Some notes on the dramaturgic approach to social reality. Sociometry, 25, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motives. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, S. F., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1956). A test of interactionist hypotheses of self-conception. The American Journal of Sociology, 61, 399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. (1970). The pragmatic movement in American philosophy. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolf, G. R. (1993). Some recent directions in symbolic interactionism. In L. T. Reynolds (Ed.), Interactionism: Exposition and critique (3rd ed., pp. 231–283). Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Stitch, S. P. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1927). Human nature and collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 32, 733–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1931). Human nature, attitudes, and mores. In K. Young (Ed.), Social attitudes (pp. 17–45). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. P. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perinbanayagam, R. S. (1985). Signifying acts. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1959). Judgment and reasoning in the child. Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., & Keller, L. S. (1990). Human-computer interaction: Selected readings. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E., & Cooper, J. (1966). Self-conceptions and others: A further test of Meadian hypotheses. The Sociological Quarterly, 7, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L. T., & Herman-Kinney, N. J. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1991). Speakers whose voice matters: Toward a feminist postmodernist sociological praxis. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 20, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. (1979). The making of symbolic interactionism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. J., & Kaplan, G. (2000). Songs, roars, and rituals: Communication in birds, mammals, and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. M. (Ed.). (1962). Human behavior and social processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubington, E., & Weinberg, M. S. (Eds.). (1968). Deviance: The interactionist perspective. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saporta, S. (Ed.). (1961). Psycholinguistics: A book of readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheff, T. J. (2003). Shame in self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. (Ed.). (1967). The Scottish moralists on human nature and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, P. F., & Backman, C. W. (1974). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. Advances in Group Processes, 4, 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck, R. (1980). The forbidden experiment: The story of the Wild Boy of Aveyron. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. The American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, T. (1961). Society and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Munich, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: W. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: A. Millar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1790). The theory of moral sentiments (6th ed.). London: W. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1987). In E. C. Mossner, I. S. Ross, R. H. Campbell, N. D. Randall, & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), The correspondence of Adam Smith (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L. (1990). Emotion as confirmation and disconfirmation of identity: An affect control model. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 238–270). New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. P. (1962). Appearance and the self. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 86–118). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. P., & Farberman, H. (1970). Social psychology through symbolic interaction. Waltham, MA: Xerox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (Ed.). (1956). The social psychology of George Herbert Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1959). Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1962). Conditions of accurate role-taking: A test of Mead’s theory. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 41–62). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1997). “In the beginning there is society”: Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty & A. Haslam (Eds.), Message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315–327). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2001). Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism: The road to identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 211–232). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2003). The symbolic interactionist frame. In J. Delameter (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918–1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Boston: Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1962). Role taking: Process vs. conformity. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20–40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1968). The self-conception in social interaction. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction (pp. 93–106). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957/1962/1987). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 1–2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videbeck, R. (1960). Self-conception and the reactions of others. Sociometry, 23, 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann, & G. Vakar, Trans.). New York: MIT Press and Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. A., & Deutschberger, P. (1964). Tasks, bargains, and identities in social interaction. Social Forces, 42, 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality. New York: MIT Press/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley, K., & Honess, T. (Eds.). (1987). Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1991). The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George J. McCall Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCall, G.J. (2013). Interactionist Perspectives in Social Psychology. In: DeLamater, J., Ward, A. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics