Skip to main content

Key Driving Factors Influencing Urban Growth: Spatial-Statistical Modelling with CLUE-s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

In a rapidly urbanising megacity such as Dhaka, identifying the driving factors that influence urban growth at different spatio-temporal scales is of considerable importance. In this study, based on literature survey and data availability, a selection of drivers is chosen and then tested through logistic regression. Using the CLUE-s land use modelling framework, the ability of these drivers to simulate urbanisation for the periods of 1988–1999 and 1999–2005 was examined against observed data. The results indicated that the role of these driving factors, as contributors to explaining change dynamics of urban land in Dhaka, changes with time. The overall performance of the model, when validated against observed data, is similar to that reported for other urban growth models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Wald statistic is the squared ratio of the unstandardised logistic coefficient to its standard error.

References

  • Ahmed SJ, Bramley G, Dewan AM (2012) Exploratory growth analysis of a megacity through different spatial metrics: a case study on Dhaka, Bangladesh (1960–2005). URISA Journal 24(1):5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam M, Rabbani MDG (2007) Vulnerabilities and responses to climate change for Dhaka. Environ Urban 19(1):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 204 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Barredo JI, Kasanko M, McCormick N, Lavalle C (2003) Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landsc Urban Plan 64(3):145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barredo JI, Demicheli L, Lavalle C, Kasanko M, McCormick N (2004) Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: an application case study in Lagos, Nigeria. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batisani N, Yarnal B (2009) Urban expansion in Centre County, Pennsylvania: spatial dynamics and landscape transformations. Appl Geogr 29(2):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Xie Y (1994) From cells to cities. Environ Plan B 21(7):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Xie Y, Sun Z (1999) Modelling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban Syst 23(3):205–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braimoha AK, Onishi T (2007) Spatial determinants of urban land use change in Lagos, Nigeria. Land Use Policy 24(2):502–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Masser I (2003) Modelling urban growth patterns: a multiscale perspective. Environ Plan A 35(4):679–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Masser I (2004) Understanding spatial and temporal processes of urban growth: cellular automata modelling. Environ Plan B Plan Des 31(2):167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(7):699–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM (2013) Floods in a megacity: geospatial techniques in assessing hazards, risk and vulnerability. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2008) Effect of land cover changes on flooding: example from Greater Dhaka of Bangladesh. Int J Geoinf 4(1):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009a) Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005. Environ Monit Assess 150(1–4):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009b) Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29(3):390–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Yeboah KK, Nishigaki M (2006a) Flood hazard delineation in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh using integrated GIS and remote sensing approach. Geocarto Int 21(2):33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Yeboah KK, Nishigaki M (2006b) Using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for mapping river water flooding in an urban landscape: a case study of Greater Dhaka. Bangladesh Jpn J Hydrol Water Resour 19(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan AM, Islam MM, Kumamoto T, Nishigaki M (2007) Evaluating Flood hazard for land-use planning in Greater Dhaka of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1601–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel C, Clarke K (2006) The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(1):78–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen G, White R, Uljee I (2002) The MURBANDY and MOLAND models for Dublin. Research Institute for Knowledge Systems (RIKS) BV, Maastricht, p 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH, Urban DL (2005) Model validation and testing: past lessons, present concerns and future prospects. In: Canham CD, Cole JC, Lauenroth WK (eds) The role of models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 186–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist H, Mcconnell W, Lambin EF, Moran E, Alves D, Rudel T (2006) Causes and trajectories of land-use/cover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist H (eds) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 41–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A (2002a) Approaching human judgement in the automated comparison of categorical maps. In: 4th international conference on recent advances in soft computing. Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A (2002b) Multi-method assessment of map similarity. In: 5th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Palma

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A (2003) Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(3):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A, Lajoie G (2008) Neutral models of landscape change as benchmarks in the assessment of model performance. Landsc Urban Plan 86(3–4):284–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A, Van Loon J, Maas A, Straatman B, De Nijs T, Engelen G (2005) Measuring performance of land use models: an evaluation framework for the calibration and validation of integrated land use models featuring cellular automata. In: 14th European colloquium on theoretical and quantitative geography, Tomar

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen HS (2008) Quantifying and analysing neighbourhood characteristics supporting urban land-use modelling. In: Bernard L, Friis-Christensen A, Pundt H (eds) The European information society: lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 283–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriquez C, Azocar G, Romero H (2006) Monitoring and modeling the urban growth of two mid-sized Chilean cities. Habitat Int 30(4):945–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Lo CP (2007) Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31(6):667–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huq S (1999) Environmental problems of Dhaka City. In Mitchell JK (eds) Crucibles of Hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo/New York/Paris. http://www.greenstone.org/greenstone3/nzdl?a=d&d=HASH9b6b117419a9f8e9a6e899.7&c=aedl&sib=1&dt=&ec=&et=&p.a=b&p.s=ClassifierBrowse&p.sa=. Accessed 12 Dec 2008

  • Islam N (1996) Dhaka: from city to megacity: perspectives on people, places, planning, and development issues. Urban Studies Programme, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam N (2005) Dhaka now: contemporary urban development. The Bangladesh Geographical Society, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D (2008) Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 10(1):26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesschen JP, Verburg PH, Staal SJ (2005) Statistical methods for analysing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming systems. LUCC report series no.7. The International Livestock Research Institute & LUCC Focus 3 Office, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 81p

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zhan J, Deng X (2005) Spatio-temporal patterns and driving forces of urban land expansion in China during the economic reform era. Ambio 34(6):450–456

    Google Scholar 

  • NPS-ROMN (2008) Travel time cost surface model, version 1.7. Rocky Mountain Network-National Park Service, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmars KP (2006) Linking process and pattern of land use change: illustrated with a case study in San Mariano, Isabela, Philippines. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, 178 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmars KP, Groot WTD, Huigen MGA (2007) Comparing inductive and deductive modeling of land use decisions: principles, a model and an illustration from the Philippines. Hum Ecol 35:439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker DC (2005) Integration of geographic information systems and agent-based models of land use: challenges and prospects. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Batty M (eds) GIS, spatial analysis and modeling. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA, Hoffmann M, Deadman P (2003) Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93(2):314–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius GR Jr, Schneider CL (2001) Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Huffaker D, Denman K (2004) Useful techniques of validation spatially explicit land-change models. Ecol Model 179(4):445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG Jr, Boersma W, Castella JS, Clarke K et al (2008) Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann Reg Sci 42(1):11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajdhani Unnayan Katripakko (RAJUK) (1993) Strategic growth options – Dhaka 2016. UNDP, UN-HABITAT, RAJUK, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajdhani Unnayan Katripakko (RAJUK) (1997) Dhaka Metropolitan Development Plan for Dhaka City (1995–2015), Vol I & II. RAJUK, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Turner Ii BL, Fox J, Mishra V (2004) Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(39):13976–13981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santé I, García AM, Miranda D, Crecente R (2010) Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 96(2):108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva EA, Clarke KC (2005) Complexity, emergence and cellular urban models: lessons learned from applying SLEUTH to two Portuguese metropolitan areas. Eur Plan Stud 13(1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straatman B, White R, Engelen G (2004) Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(1–2):149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui DZ, Zeng H (2001) Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia’s emerging desakota regions: a case study in Shenzhen. Landsc Urban Plan 53(1–4):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Fresco LO (1996) CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecol Model 91(1–3):231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Lambin EF (2001) Predicting land-use change. Editor Agric Ecos Environ 85:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Overmars KP (2007) Dynamic simulation of land-use change trajectories with the CLUE-s model. In: Koomen E, Stillwell J, Bakema A, Scholten HJ (eds) Modelling land-use change: progress and applications, 40. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–337

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SS (2002) Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ Manage 30(3):391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Schot P, Dijst MJ, Veldkamp A (2004a) Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61(4):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Ritsema Van Eck JR, Nijs TCMD, Dijst MJ, Schot P (2004b) Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environ Plan B Plan Des 31(1):125–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Nijs TCMD, Ritsema Van Eck JR, Visser HJ, de Jong K (2004c) A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(6):667–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Kok K, Pontius RG, Veldkamp A (2006) Modeling land-use and land-cover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist H (eds) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 117–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Eickhout B, Meul HV (2008) A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. Ann Reg Sci 42(1):57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser H (2004) The map comparison kit: methods, software and applications. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, 124 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser H, De Nijs T (2006) The map comparison kit. Environ Model Software 21(3):346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vliet JV (2009) Assessing the accuracy of changes in spatial explicit land use change models. In: 12th AGILE international conference on geographic information science Leibniz, Universität Hannover, Hanover

    Google Scholar 

  • White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environ Plan A 25(8):1175–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White R, Engelen G (2000) High resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24(5):383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White R, Straatman B, Engelen G (2004) Planning scenario visualization and assessment: a cellular automata based integrated spatial decision support system. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle D (eds) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 420–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F (2002) Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 16(8):795–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Li H-Q, Wang R-S, Paulussen J, Hec Y, Wang M, Wang BH, Wang Z (2006) Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Shen Y, Ge J, Tateishi R, Tang C, Liang Y, Huang Z (2006) Evaluating urban expansion and land use change in Shijiazhuang, China, by using GIS and remote sensing. Landsc Urban Plan 75(1–2):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh AGO, Li X (1998) Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(2):169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was conducted as part of a Doctoral project in Urban Studies at the Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh in the UK. The authors would like to thank the ORS and James Watt Scholarship for funding the study. Also, the authors like to thank Dr Ashraf M. Dewan for providing access to the land cover datasets. The authors are also grateful to Professor Mark Birkin (University of Leeds) and Professor Michael White (Nottingham Trent University) for constructive suggestions on the structuring of the simulation framework used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohel J. Ahmed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahmed, S.J., Bramley, G., Verburg, P.H. (2014). Key Driving Factors Influencing Urban Growth: Spatial-Statistical Modelling with CLUE-s. In: Dewan, A., Corner, R. (eds) Dhaka Megacity. Springer Geography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6735-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics