Skip to main content

Global Introduction of a Low-Cost Contraceptive Implant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Issues in Reproductive Health

Abstract

Hormone-releasing subdermal implants are a safe, highly effective, and reversible form of contraception that provides continuous pregnancy protection for 3–5 years depending on the type of implant. Implants are among the most effective forms of contraception available; efficacy is comparable to other long-acting and permanent methods including the intrauterine device (IUD) and sterilization, with annual pregnancy rates less than 1 % for women using these methods (Mansour et al. 2010). However, unlike the IUD or female sterilization which requires a gynecological procedure, implants are inserted under the skin of a woman’s upper arm. Because no regular action is required by the user and no routine resupply or clinical follow-up is needed, implants are widely seen as an ideal method for women with limited access to health services, particularly women in developing countries (Frost and Reich 2008). However, despite the advantages of this method, worldwide use of implants is low: whereas 56 % of married women between the ages of 15 and 49 around the globe use a modern method of contraception, less than 1 % use implants (United Nations 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quotations are from unpublished interview transcripts recorded in a 2008 study of female sex workers in Kenya, from which some results have been published in Sutherland et al. (2011).

  2. 2.

    Costs include commodities, supplies and labor.

  3. 3.

    These GMP inspections were conducted by the Chinese SFDA; NQA, an international assessment group based in the UK; national drug regulatory authorities as part of the product registration process; and international NGOs and procurement organizations such as PSI.

  4. 4.

    Lot release testing refers to the conduct of a series of contingency tests of representative samples from a single manufacturing run of product. Based on the results of these tests, the product is either cleared for distribution or rejected. For additional information on lot release testing, see Table 14.2.

  5. 5.

    These include the United States Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia, International Organization for Standardization, and ASTM (formerly the American Society for Testing and Materials).

  6. 6.

    To this end, the Chinese government is in the process of updating their current GMP guidelines; the latest draft was issued in early 2011. The revised version incorporates key concepts from the ICH GMP guidance as well as EU and US GMP regulations, thus strengthening the international credibility of future Chinese inspections.

  7. 7.

    By May 2012, Sino-implant (II) had been registered in Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chile, Ethiopia, Fiji, Ghana, Jamaica, Kenya, Madagascar, Mali, Malawi, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Uganda, Zambia, and Zanzibar, as well as China and Indonesia.

  8. 8.

    At the outset of the process, Dahua did not have any English speakers on staff. FHI 360 helped navigate the application process, assisted with development of a Common Technical Document dossier, and engaged consultants to conduct mock GMP audits and advise Dahua on preparations. The Common Technical Document was submitted to WHO and accepted for official review in the fall of 2010.

  9. 9.

    The study followed 600 women over a period of 12 months. Results are expected by the end of 2013.

  10. 10.

    FHI 360 does not procure or donate commodities under the initiative. Rather, donors, NGOs and Ministries of Health buy units of Sino-implant (II) for country-level programs.

  11. 11.

    Savings are calculated based on a price of $8 for Sino-implant assuming the alternative is to purchase Jadelle (average unit price for Jadelle was $24 in 2009, $22 in 2010, $19 in 2011 and US$18 in 2012). Prices were calculated using information from the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition and the RHInterchange: http://rhi.rhsupplies.org/.

  12. 12.

    At the end of 2012, the volume thresholds were reached for Implanon sales which triggered an additional retro-active price reduction to $16.50, according to the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition (RHSC 2012b).

References

  • Adamchak, S. (2010). Sino-implant (II): Year 2 monitoring, learning and evaluation experience. FHI. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, K., & Beal, M. W. (2009). Implanon: A review of the literature with recommendations for clinical management. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 54(2), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barot, S. (2008). Back to basics: The rationale for increased funds for international family planning. Guttmacher Policy Review, 11, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer HealthCare. (2012, September 26). Bayer joins global initiative for better access to safe and effective contraception. Press release. http://press.healthcare.bayer.com/en/press/news-details-page.php/14732/2012-0429. Accessed Sept 2012.

  • Bertrand, J. T., Rice, J., Sullivan, T. M., & Shelton, J. (2000). Skewed method mix: A measure of quality in family planning programs. Chapel Hill: MEASURE Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (BMGF). (2013). Innovative partnership reduces cost of Bayer’s long-acting reversible contraceptive implant by more than 50 percent. Press release. February 27, 2013. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2013/02/Partnership-Reduces-Cost-Of-Bayers-Reversible-Contraceptive-Implant. Accessed May 2013.

  • Brett, T. (2011, May 24). Associate Director of Procurement, MSI. Interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton Health Access Initiative. (2011). Regulatory approvals for ARVs: An analysis of review timelines under the US FDA, WHO PQ, and ERP (Internal report). Received via personal correspondence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coukell, A. J., & Balfour, J. A. (1998). Levonorgestrel subdermal implants: A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability. Drugs, 55(6), 861–887.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • d’Arcangues, C. (2007). Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception, 75, S2–S7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engenderhealth. (2009). Respond project. Meeting national goals and people’s needs with LA/PMs: Kenya country assessment. http://www.respond-project.org/pages/index.php

  • FHI. (2010). Zarin launch in Sierra Leone. Fact sheet. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • FHI 360 (2009 and 2012). Process capability analysis reports. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N., Calmy, A., & Mills, E. J. (2011). The first decade of antiretroviral therapy in Africa. Globalization and Health, 7, 33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L. J., & Reich, M. R. (2008). Access: How do good health technologies get to poor people in poor countries? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, O. (2006). WHO program for prequalification of antiretroviral, antimalarial and antituberculosis drugs. Médecine Tropicale, 66(6), 549–551.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., Oehlera, J., Woo, P., et al. (2007). A study of the capability of manufacturers of generic hormonal contraceptives in lower- and middle-income countries. Contraception, 75, 311–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. (2011, June 20). FDA confronts challenge of monitoring imports. Agency head outlines difficulties and risks of food and drug imports. The New York Times, B3. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/health/policy/21food.html

  • Hohmann, H., & Creinin, M. D. (2007). The contraceptive implant. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50(4), 907–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacher, D., & Dorflinger, L. (2012). Avoiding controversy in international provision of subdermal contraceptive implants. Contraception, 85(5), 432–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacher, D., Kimani, J., Steiner, M., et al. (2007). Contraceptive implants in Kenya: Current status and future prospects. Contraception, 75(6), 468–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Issak, B. (2011, May 18). Head of the Division of Reproductive Health, Kenya Ministry of Health. Interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D., Taylor, D., Owen, D., & Steiner, M. (2010). Evaluation of Sino-implant (II) explants (Final report). Family Health International. Durham, NC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro. (2010). Kenya demographic and health survey 2008–09. Calverton: KNBS & ICF Macro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, D. (2011, May 24). Independent regulatory consultant. Interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macartney, J. (2008, September 22). China baby milk scandal spreads as sick toll rises to 13,000. Times Online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4800458.ece

  • Mansour, D., Inki, P., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2010). Efficacy of contraceptive methods: A review of the literature. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 15(1), 4–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marie Stopes International. (2012). Impact calculator. www.mariestopes.org

  • Marie Stopes International (MSI), FHI, Pharm Access Africa, Ltd. (2010). Introducing the contraceptive Sino-implant (II) (Zarin) in Sierra Leone (Final report). Available at: http://www.k4health.org/toolkits/implants/country_experiences/sierraleone

  • Mavranezouli, I. (2009). Health economics of contraception. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23(2), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milistein, J., Costa, A., Jadhav, S., & Dhere, R. (2009). Reaching international GMP standards for vaccine production: Challenges for developing countries. Expert Review of Vaccines, 8(5), 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSD. (2013). MSD and partners announce agreement to increase access to innovative contraceptive implants Implanon® and Implanon Nxt® in the poorest countries. Press release. May 2013. http://www.rhsupplies.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Announcements/MERCK_EXTERNAL_STATEMENT_FINAL_May_2013__4_.pdf. Accessed May 2013.

  • Neukom, J., Chilambwe, J., Mkandawire, J., et al. (2011). Dedicated providers of long-acting reversible contraception: New approach in Zambia. Contraception, 83(5), 447–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power, J., French, R., & Cowan, F. (2007). Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3(3), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchandran, D., & Upadhyay, U. D. (2007). Implants: The next generation. Popul Rep Ser K Injectables Implants, 7, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition (RHSC). (2011, June 24). Private and public sectors announce commitments to increase access to contraceptives. Press release. http://www.rhsupplies.org/. Accessed 13 July 2011.

  • Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition (RHSC) (2012a, February). Supply Insider. http://www.rhsupplies.org/. Accessed 7 May 2012.

  • Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition (RHSC) (2012b, November 19). Coalition-supported initiative triggers more than $15 million in savings. Press release. http://www.rhsupplies.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.

  • RHInterchange. http://rhi.rhsupplies.org/rhi/index.do?locale=en_US. Accessed May 2011 and May 2013.

  • Sivin, I., Nash, H., & Waldman, S. (2002). Jadelle levonorgestrel rod implants: A summary of scientific data and lessons learned from programmatic experience. New York: The Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sierra Leone, & ICF Macro. (2009). Sierra Leone demographic and health survey 2008. Calverton: Statistics Sierra Leone (SSL) and ICF Macro. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR225/FR225.pdf

  • Steiner, M. J., Lopez, L. M., Grimes, D. A., et al. (2010). Sino-implant (II) – A levonorgestrel-releasing two-rod implant: Systematic review of the randomized controlled trials. Contraception, 81, 197–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Story, L. (2007, August 2). Lead paint prompts mattel to recall 967,000 toys. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/business/02toy.html

  • Sullivan, T. M., Bertrand, J. T., Rice, J., & Shelton, J. D. (2006). Skewed contraceptive mix: Why it happens, why it matters. Journal of BiosocialScience, 38, 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. G., Alaii, J., Tsui, S., et al. (2011). Contraceptive needs of female sex workers in Kenya – A cross-sectional study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 16(3), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson, K., Steiner, M., Rademacher, K., et al. (2011). The promise of affordable implants: Is cost recovery possible in Kenya? Contraception, 83, 88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Agency for International Development (2012, September 26). New partnership expands access to contraception for 27 million women and girls in low-income countries. Press release. http://www.usaid.gov/news-information/press-releases/new-partnership-expands-access-contraception-27-million-women-and. Accessed Sept 2012.

  • United Nations Commission on Life-Saving Commodities for Women and Children (2012, September). Commissioners’ report. http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/images/UN_Commission_Report_September_2012_Final.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2011). World contraceptive use 2010. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wcu2010/Main.html.

  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) (2011, April). First invitation to manufacturers of reproductive health medicines to submit an Expression of Interest (EOI) for product evaluation and UNFPA Technical assessment by the Expert Review Panel (ERP) or the Internal Technical Committee. Received through personal correspondence, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • US FDA. (2007). Melamine pet food recall of 2007. http://www.fda.gov/animalveterinary/safetyhealth/recallswithdrawals/ucm129575.htm

  • Waning, B., Kaplan, W., King, A. C., et al. (2009). Global strategies to reduce the price of antiretroviral medicines: Evidence from transactional databases. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(7), 520–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, V. J., Forsythe, S., Valencia-Mendoza, A., et al. (2009). Factors influencing global antiretroviral procurement prices. BMC Public Health, 9(Suppl 1), S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010, August). WHO prequalification. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs278/en/index.html. Accessed Dec 2010.

  • World Health Organization. (2012). Prequalification programme. http://apps.who.int/prequal/. Accessed Nov 2012.

  • Zhou, C. (2011, June 27) Sales Manager, Shanghai Dahua Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. Personal correspondence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the contribution of John Bratt and Katherine Tumlinson to the analysis of direct service delivery costs for contraceptive methods. The authors also want to thank Timothy Mastro, Charles Morrison, Diane Luo, David Asante and David Hubacher for their review of the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate H. Rademacher MHA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rademacher, K.H., Vahdat, H.L., Dorflinger, L., Owen, D.H., Steiner, M.J. (2014). Global Introduction of a Low-Cost Contraceptive Implant. In: Kulczycki, A. (eds) Critical Issues in Reproductive Health. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6721-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6722-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics