Abstract
Increasing preference is given for technologically mediated solutions to solve developmental issues, such as hunger and scarcity of food. A classic example of this kind is the introduction of ‘Green Revolution’ in the early 1960s. To increase global food supply in order to feed the growing population has been a dominant policy discourse ever since but the emerging controversies over agricultural biotechnology and genetically modified Foods show how this remains a key issue. Is intensified ‘production at all costs’, a sustainable and viable method/solution to attain global food security? The following chapter is an attempt to present debates around food security in general, and linkages between agricultural biotechnology, intellectual property rights and trans-national seed corporations and implications to food security. Two concurrent trajectories mould this chapter. First, it conceptualizes food security with an elementary approach: from the perspective of SEED. Seeds are knowledge intensive goods with direct linkages to food entitlements at all levels of the socio-economic sphere. Second, the chapter seeks to contextualize food security in an expanding ‘knowledge-based economy’. A knowledge-based economy is understood as production and services based on knowledge and technology-intensive activities that contribute to an accelerated pace of production and economic growth. Biotechnology for example is seen as an arena where knowledge is effectively turned into capital. Commodification of genetic modified seeds on a global scale reveals that seeds are regarded as private property, which can be bought and sold especially by trans-national seed corporations, contrasting traditional ways of seed saving and farming methods. Simultaneously, internationalization of the Patency regime has set rules on the ownership, control and usage of seeds. Biotechnology research is resource intensive; hence most of the breakthroughs lie in the private sector. The Intellectual property Rights over transgenic seeds transfer full control of seeds over to the corporations. Farmers having to pay royalty or ‘monopoly rents’ in exchange of replanting seeds, to corporations signifies that these rules not only protect innovation and determine the ‘who’ but also the ‘terms’ of usage and control. This phenomenon has alterations on the entire chain of food: from mode of farming, production, nutrition, distribution to sale of food, which are all significant elements contributing to a general wellbeing and food secure situation. At this point a very fundamental question arises: Is Knowledge capital embedded in the current international proprietary framework a driver for ‘sustainable’ development in agriculture and food security? As a way of conclusion, the chapter with aid of statistics and graphics presents a potential and possible future scenario of a monopolized global food market, where due to extensive consolidation processes in the private sector, monopoly power can come into play with total control over the food chain and food prices.
The process of turning into a commodity: commercialization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Unequal Land distribution and Feudal character of agrarian society.
- 2.
For example India and many other countries give high credit to the Green Revolution and owe it to preventing famines.
- 3.
Uruguay Round of trade talks between 1986 and 1994 within the framework of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in Punta Del Este, Uruguay.
- 4.
Endowment: A combination of all resources legally owned by a person, both tangible and intangible assets like land, animals, equipments and knowledge, skill, labor power, membership in a community respectively.
- 5.
Entitlement mapping: Relationship between endowment set and entitlement set. Basically indicates the rates at which the resources of the endowment set can be converted into goods and services included in the entitlement set: fall in wages, loss of employment, and rise in food prices.
- 6.
Entitlement: A combination of goods and services that a person can legally obtain by using the resources from his/her endowment set.
- 7.
Uruguay Round of trade talks between 1986 and 1994 within the framework of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in Punta Del Este, Uruguay.
- 8.
Coined by activist Pat Mooney in a report: Seeds of the Earth, 1979. Plants growing out of terminator seeds yield sterile seeds.
- 9.
1772–1823 proponent of free trade and most known for his law of comparative advantage. Basic premise of comparative advantage is that countries can gain by specializing in the good where it has comparative advantage and trading that good for the other.
- 10.
GATT part of the international monetary system was created at the end of second world war and lasted until it became the World Trade Organization in 1995.
- 11.
September 1986, in Punta del Este-Uruguay talks were launched to extend the trading system multi laterally touching several new areas prominently intellectual property, trade in services, reforming sensitive sectors of agriculture and textiles. The talks ended in April 1994. GATT was replaced by the World Trade Organization.
- 12.
http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2011/stories/20030606006012600.htm, accessed on 06.09.2011.
- 13.
http://www.hindu.com/2010/11/14/stories/2010111458980100.htm, accessed on 06.09.2011.
- 14.
- 15.
Consolidation process indicates to mergers or unions of corporations.
References
Bellman, C., Dutfield, G., & Mele´ndez-Ortiz, R. (2003). Trading in knowledge: Development perspectives on TRIPS, trade and sustainability (p. 210). First published in the UK and USA by Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2007). The political economy of hunger (Vol. 1, p. 38). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
FAO. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3613e/w3613e00.htm. Checked on 13 Apr 2013.
Gadwal, V. R. (2003). The Indian seed industry: Its history, current status and future. Current Science, 84(3), 399.
Gaud, S. W. (1968). Official speech to the Society for International Development in 1968. http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/speeches-presentations/first-green-revolution-accomplishments
Gómez-Barbero, M., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2006). Economic impact of dominant GM crops worldwide: A review (p. 12). European Commission. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1172656607_ipts_ogm_eur22547en.pdf
Gold, E. R., Herder, M., & Trommetter, M. (2007). The role of biotechnology intellectual property rights in the bioeconomy of 2030 (p. 4). OECD International Futures Program. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/58/40925999.pdf
Goodman, D., Sorj, B., & Wilkinson, J. (1987). From farming to bio-technology: A theory of agro-industrial development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gupta, A. (1998). Postcolonial developments: Agriculture in the making of modern India pp. 98–100). Durham: Duke University Press.
Karihaloo, J. L., & Kumar, P. A. (2009). Bt cotton in India: A status report. Asia-Pacific consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology. http://www.apaari.org/wp- content/uploads/2009/10/bt-cotton-2nd-edition.pdf
Kautsky, K. (1988). The Agrarian question. London: Zwan Publications.
Lewontin, R. C., & Berlan, J. P. (1986). Technology, research and the penetration of capital: The case of U.S. Agriculture. Monthly Review, 38(3), 21–34.
Mooney, P. R. (1979). Cited in Kloppenburg, R. J. Jr. (2004). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000 (2nd ed.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Malthus, T. (1798). An essay on the principle of population pp. 4–5). http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf
Mann, S. A., & Dickinson, J. M. (1978). Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, 5(4), 466–481.
Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo. (2006). Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: a Review, P. 12, European Comission. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1172656607_ipts_ogm_eur22547en.pdf
O’Donnell, W. R., O’Malley, J. J., Huis, R. J., & Halt, B. G., Jr. (2008). Intellectual property in the food technology industry: Protecting your innovation. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York: Springer.
Pratt, E. T. Jr. (1996). Intellectual property rights and international trade. http://www.iatp.org/files/Intellectual_Property_Rights_and_International.htm. Verified on 13 Apr 2013.
Pray, C. E., & Nagarajan, L. (2010). Price controls and biotechnology innovation: Are state government policies reducing research and innovation by the Ag biotech industry in India?. AgBioForum, 13(4), 297–307. http://www.agbioforum.org/v13n4/v13n4a02-pray.htm
Shiva, V. (2010). In W. Sachs (Ed.), Resources in the development dictionary, a guide to knowledge as power (p. 236). London: Zedbooks.
Sell, K. S. (1999). Multinational corporations as agents of change: The globalization of intellectual property rights. p. 3. http://research.rmutp.ac.th/paper/cu/Multinational%20%corporations%as%agents%20%20change.pdf
Scoones, I. (2002). Agricultural biotechnology and food security: Exploring the debate (IDS working paper 145) p. 9. Institute of Development Studies.
Shiva, V. (1991). The violence of the green revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology and politics. Zed Books Ltd.
Shiva, V. (1997). Monocultures of the mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. Zed Books Ltd & Third World Network.
Sen, A. (1982). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WTO Agricultural Negotiations. (2004, December). The issues, and where we are now. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/agnegs_bkgrnd_e.pdf
WTO Agricultural Trade Fact Sheet. (1999). Agricultural trade and food security. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/003/X6730E/X6730E03.pdf
Yapa, S. L. (1977). The Green Revolution: A diffusion model. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 67(3), 350–359.
Internet Pages
http://www.apaari.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bt-cotton-2nd-edition.pdf, p. 27. Accessed on 6 Sept 2011
IFPRI report, Bt Cotton and Farmer Suicides in India, 2008.
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/shortagebt-cotton-seeds-may-hit-2011-12-production-able/125831/on. Accessed on 6 Sept 2011.
http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/eur22547en.pdf, p. 13. Accessed on 9 Apr 2011.
http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2011/stories/20030606006012600.htm. Accessed on 6 Sept 2011.
http://www.mahyco.com/legacy_of_mahyco.html. Accessed on 6 Sept 2011, repetition.
http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact5_e.htm. Accessed on 9 Apr 2011.
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm. Accessed on 9 Apr 2011.
http://monsanto.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=562. Accessed on 6 Sept 2011.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/jul/25/gm.food. Accessed on 9 Aug 2011.
http://www.iatp.org/files/Intellectual_Property_Rights_and_International.htm. Accessed on 9 Feb 2011.
http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm. Accessed on 9 Mar 2011.
http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm3_e.htm. Accessed on 9 Mar 2011.
http://viacampesina.org/en/ – The international peasant movement and network. Accessed on 9 Aug 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parthasarathi, S. (2013). Food Security in Knowledge-Based Economy: Role of Trans-national Seed Corporations. In: Behnassi, M., Pollmann, O., Kissinger, G. (eds) Sustainable Food Security in the Era of Local and Global Environmental Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6719-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6719-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6718-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6719-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)