Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 11))

Abstract

Although increasing our knowledge of the properties of networks of cities is essential, these properties can be measured at the city level, and must be assessed by analyzing actor networks. The present volume focuses less on individual characteristics and more on the interactions of actors and institutions that create functional territories in which the structure of existing links constrains emerging links. Rather than basing explanations on external factors, the goal is to determine the extent to which network properties reflect spatial distributions and create local synergies at the meso level that are incorporated into global networks at the macro level where different geographical scales occur.

The paper introduces the way to use the graphs structure to identify empirically relevant groups and levels that explain dynamics. It defines what could be called “multi-level”, “multi-scale”, or “multidimensional” networks in the context of urban geography. It explains how the convergence of the network multi-territoriality paradigm collaboratively formulated, and manipulated by geographers and computer scientists produced the SPANGEO project, which is exposed in this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The TULIP Software is free and open access: http://tulip.labri.fr/

References

  • Alderson, A. S., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology,109(4), 811–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (1999). Cities of power and influence: Settled formations. In J. Allen, D. Massey, & M. Pryke (Eds.), Unsettling cities (pp. 182–227). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Salinger, M. A., & Stanley, H. E. (1998). Power law scaling for a system of interacting units with complex internal structure. Physical Review Letters,80(7), 1385–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, M., Mélançon, G., & Rozenblat, C. (2005). Réseaux multi-niveaux: l’exemple des échanges aériens mondiaux. Mappemonde,79(3), 20 p. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://mappemonde.mgm.fr/num7/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1972). More is different: Broken symmetry and the hierarchical nature of science. Science,177, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, J. S., Herrmann, H. J., Andrade, R. F. S., & Da Silva, L. R. (2005). Apollonian networks: Simultaneously scale-free, small world, Euclidean, space filling, and with matching graphs. Physical Review Letters,94(1), 018702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badaracco, J. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L., & Albers, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science,286, 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2006). Hierarchy in cities and city systems. In D. Pumain (Ed.), Hierarchy in natural and social sciences (pp. 143–168). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. (1964). Cities as systems within systems of cities. In J. Friedmann, & W. Alonso (Eds.), Regional development and planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (also in Paper of Regional Science Association, 1964, 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. (1973). Sémiologie graphique: Les diagrammes-Les réseaux-Les cartes. Paris, France: Gauthier-VillarsMouton & Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: Notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,3, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. Sutton, & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction of social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1999). The city as a milieu: Applying GREMI’s approach to urban evolution. Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine (RERU),3, 591–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Rietvelt, P. (1998). The concept of network synergies in economic theory: Policy implications. In K. Button, P. Nijkamp, & H. Priemus (Eds.), Transport networks in Europe: Concepts, analysis and policies (pp. 57–83). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, R. J., & Haggett, P. (1969). Network analysis in geography. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. (Ed.). (2003). Methodology and epistemology of multilevel analysis. Approaches from different social sciences (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, M. F. (1964). A note of some number properties of a hexagonal hierarchical plane lattice. Journal of the Regional Science Association,5, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, H. W. C. (2001). Chain networks, territories and scales: Toward a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks,1(2), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., & Malmberg, A. (2001). Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography,77(4), 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollfus, O. (2001). La mondialisation. Paris, France: Presses de science Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Empirical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, W. L. (1960). Connectivity of the interstate highway system. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association,6, 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, W. L., Berry, B. J. L., Marble, D. F., Nystuen, J. D., & Morrill, R. L. (1959). Studies of highway development and geographic change. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (1996). Global commodity chains: New forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. Competition and Change,1(4), 427–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques. Paris, France: SIRET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P., & White, R. (1974). Mental maps. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R., & Fernandez, R. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology,19, 89–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (2006). Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: Mapping travels of “networks” between economic sociology and economic geography. Progress in Human Geography,30(2), 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin Pace, F. (1995). Rank-size distribution and the process of urban growth. Urban Studies, 32(3), (551–562).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimerà, R., Mossa, S., Turtschi, A., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(22), 7794–7799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassaert da Costa, R. (2004). De la déterritorialisation à la multiterritorialité. In S. Allemand, F.R. Ascher, & J. Lévy (dir.), Les sens du mouvement (pp. 69–79). Paris, Berlin: Institut pour la ville en mouvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1952). The propagation of innovation waves (Vol. 4). Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A. (1909). [1894] The evolution of modern capitalism: a study of machine production. New York: Walter Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansky, K. (1963). Structure of transportation networks: Relationships between network geometry and regional characteristics (Technical Rep. No. 84). Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. (2006). Hierarchy, complexity, society. In D. Pumain (Ed.), Hierarchy in natural and social sciences (pp. 81–119). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, A. (1883). Analysis of relationships of consanguinity and affinity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland,12, 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today,1, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. (1851). League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee or Iroquois. Rochester, NY: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M., Watts, D., & Barabasi, A.-L. (Eds.). (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation state – How region states harness the prosperity of the global economy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D., Paulus, F., Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C., & Lobo, J. (2006). An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. Cybergéo: Revue européenne de géographie, 343, 20 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret, R. (2007). Is regionalism an increasing feature of the world economy. The World Economy, 30(6), 923–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, I. d. S., & Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks,1, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network form of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour,12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1974). Major job-providing organizations and systems of cities. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1977). City-systems in advanced economies. London: Hutchinson University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D. (1982). La dynamique des villes. Paris, France: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D. (1997). Pour une théorie évolutive des villes. L’Espace Géographique,2, 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D. (2006). Alternative explanations of hierarchical differentiation in urban systems. In D. Pumain (Ed.), Hierarchy in natural and social sciences (pp. 169–222). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain, D., Sanders, L., & Saint-Julien, T. (1989). Villes et auto-organisation. Paris, France: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin, C. (1980). Pour une géographie du pouvoir. Paris, France: Library Techniques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C. (2004). Intégration dans le commerce international: l’évidence du graphique triangulaire. Mappemonde,75, 15 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C. (2007). Villes et réseaux “petits-mondes”. In A. Da Cunha & L. Matthey (Eds.), La ville et l’urbain: des savoirs émergents (pp. 81–105). Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniques Romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C., Bohan, C., & Benet, G. (2008). Multinational corporate networks in Central European cities. In M.-C. Maurel (Ed.), Central European cities in globalization. CEFRES: Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C., & Cicille, P. (2003). Les villes européennes: Analyse comparative/Die Stadte Europas. Ein vergleichende Analyse. DATAR-La Documentation française Paris / Bündesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung. Bonn, 123 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C., & Pumain, D. (1993). The location of multinational firms in the European urban system. Urban studies,10, 1691–1709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat, C., & Pumain, D. (2007). Firm linkages, innovation and the evolution of urban systems. In P. J. Taylor, B. Derudder, P. Saey, F. Witlox (Eds.), Cities in globalization. Practices, policies and theories (pp. 130–156). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2001). The end of globalization: Why global strategy is a myth and how to profit from realities of regional markets. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L. (1992). Système de villes et synergétique. Paris, France: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1991). The global vity: New York – London – Tokyo. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika,42(3–40), 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., & Salais, R. (1997). Worlds of production. The action frameworks of the economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Cook, K. (2006). A visual analytics agenda. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 26(1), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1963). Geographic area and map projections. Geographical Review, 53(1), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1965). Computation of the correspondence of geographical patterns. Papers of the Regional Science Association,15(1), 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32, 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly,42, 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk, J. (2005). The value of visualization. In C. Silva, E. Groeller, & H. Rushmeier (Eds.), IEEE visualization conference (VIS 2005) (pp. 79–86).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. (1999). Small worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature,393, 440–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1998). Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: The limited effects of cross-national coordination of the economic activities on the nature of business systems. Review of International Political Economy,5, 445–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J., & Yule, G. (1922). Some statistics of evolution and geographical distribution in plants and animals, and their significance. Nature,109, 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (1967). A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research,1, 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2000). Complex spatial systems: The modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis. Harlow: Prentice Hall Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. (2002). The limits to globalization theory: A geographic perspective on global economic change. Economic Geography,78, 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. (1925). A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences213, 21–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principal of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Adison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Rozenblat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rozenblat, C., Melançon, G. (2013). Introduction. In: Rozenblat, C., Melançon, G. (eds) Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualisation of Geographical Networks. Methodos Series, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6677-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics