Skip to main content

CO2 Capture Transport and Storage, a Promising Technology for Limiting Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1378 Accesses

Part of the book series: Integrated Science & Technology Program ((ISTP,volume 2))

Abstract

On a world-scale basis, fossil fuels are likely to remain the main sources for electricity generation in the twenty-first century, and many industrial processes that are also large CO2 emitters will still be active for many decades. Therefore, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is generally considered a necessary option for reducing CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. This chapter introduces the concept, which consists in the separation of CO2 from energy-related and industrial gas streams, and its transport to a geological storage location where it is permanently and safely stored. The characteristics of the main capture processes: postcombustion, oxycombustion, and precombustion are summarized in terms of energy consumption and costs. Some other possible technological options are briefly described. The methods utilized for CO2 transport are also presented with some cost estimates. The main formation for geological storage—depleted oil and gas fields, deep saline aquifers, and nonexploitable coal seams—are briefly described, with the mechanisms involved in storage operations. Storage capacity evaluations, methodologies for risk assessment and management, are also briefly summarized. The chapter discusses the 14 large-scale integrated CCS projects which are in operation or under construction today, with a rough total storage capacity of 33 million tons a year. This could indicate that provided public awareness, social acceptance, and economic drivers evolve favorably, CCS could play a very significant role in the transition to a future low emission energy use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Air is a mixture of oxygen (O2), Nitrogen (N2), Argon (Ar).

  2. 2.

    A gasification process can produce syngas from high-sulfur coal, heavy petroleum residues, and biomass. The plant is called integrated because its syngas is produced in a gasification unit in the plant which has been optimized for the plant’s combined cycle (gas + steam). The syngas produced is used as fuel in a gas turbine that produces electrical power. To improve the overall process efficiency heat is recovered from both the gasification process and also the gas turbine exhaust in “waste heat boilers” producing steam. This steam is then used in steam turbines to produce additional electrical power.

  3. 3.

    Mafic is used for silicate minerals, magmas, and rocks that are relatively high in the heavier elements. The term is derived from the “ma” of magnesium and the “fic” of ferric oxide. Ultramafic rocks contain higher amounts of Fe and Mg.

Abbreviations

ASU:

Air separation unit

CCS:

Carbon capture and storage

CDM:

Clean development mechanism

COP:

Conference of the Parties

CSLF:

Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum

DOGF:

Depleted oil and gas fields

ECBM:

Enhanced coalbed methane

EGR:

Enhanced gas recovery

EOR:

Enhanced oil recovery

ETS:

Emission trading scheme

EU:

European Union

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

IEA:

International Energy Agency

IGCC:

Integrated gasification combined cycle

IPCC:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

LNG:

Liquefied natural gas

MIT:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MMV:

Measure monitoring and verification

MPa:

MegaPascal (1 MPa = 106 Pa)

Mt:

Megaton (1 Mt = 106 ton)

MtCO2/y:

Megaton of CO2 per year

MW:

MegaWatt (1 MW = 106 W)

MWth:

Thermal megaWatt

NER300:

EU program involving both CCS and renewable energy sources (RES) technologies

NGO:

Nongovernmental organization

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Pa:

Pascal (Pressure unit:1 atmosphere # 105 Pa)

SA:

Deep saline aquifer

UNFCCC:

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

ZEP:

Zero emission platform

References

  • Audigane P, Gaus I, Czernichowski-Lauriol I, Pruess K, Xu T (2007) Two-dimensional reactive transport modeling of CO2 injection in a saline aquifer at the Sleipner Site, North Sea. Am J Sci 307:974–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis-King JP, Paterson L (2003) Role of convective mixing in the long-term storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline formations. Presented at Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, 5–8 Oct 2003, SPE paper no. 84344

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROBAROMETER 364 (2011) Public Awareness and Acceptance of CO2 capture and storage. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf

  • Finkelrath M (2011) Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation. IEA Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter GW, Finneran JM, Hartmann DJ, Miller JD (1997) Early determination of reservoir flow units using an integrated petrophysical method. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, TX, 5–8 Oct 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse MA, Orr FM, Tchelepi HA (2008) Gravity currents with residual trapping. J Fluid Mech 611:35–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ide SK, Jessen K, Orr FM (2007) Storage of CO2 in saline aquifers: effects of gravity, viscous, and capillary forces on amount and timing of trapping. Int J Greenh Gas Control 4:481–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschel D, Coxam JY, Rodier L, Majer V (2006) Enthalpy and solubility data of CO2 in water and NaCl (aq) at conditions of interest for geological sequestration. Fluid Ph Equilib 247:107–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lagneau V, Pipart A, Catalette H (2005) Reactive transport modelling of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers. Oil Gas Sci Technol 60:231–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metz B, Davidson O, Loos M, de Coninck H, Meyer L (2005) Carbon dioxide capture and storage, IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbee J, Serpa J, Tzimas E (2010) The evolution of the extend and the investment requirements of the trans-European CO2 transport network. JRC scientific and technical reports. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelkers EH, Schott J, Gauthier JM, Herrero-Roncal T (2008) An experimental study of the dissolution mechanism and rates of muscovite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:4948–4961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg C (2007) Migration mechanisms and potential impacts of CO2 leakage and seepage. In: Wilson EJ, Gerard D (eds) Carbon capture and sequestration: integrating technology, monitoring, regulation. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Spycher N, Pruess K, Ennis-king J (2003) CO2-H2O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100°C and up to 600 bar. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:3015–3031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ZEP (2009) The cost of CO2 transport. Post demonstration CCS in the EU European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEP (2011) The cost of CO2 storage. Post demonstration CCS in the EU European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Fouillac .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fouillac, C. (2013). CO2 Capture Transport and Storage, a Promising Technology for Limiting Climate Change. In: Saulnier, J., Varella, M. (eds) Global Change, Energy Issues and Regulation Policies. Integrated Science & Technology Program, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6661-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics