Skip to main content

A Multi-level and Participatory Model for Prevention of Work-Related Stress in Knowledge Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Work-related stress is an increasing problem for knowledge workers, despite employee control and influence. As a consequence, the knowledge industry has expressed the need for new knowledge and approaches regarding how to support sustainable preventive action and assure productivity and well-being. A healthy organization has its starting point in the organization, and with a salutogenic approach, focus is on how the organization and work system can be designed in order to improve productivity and working conditions for the individuals involved. Two consecutive research and development projects building on a mixed-method approach have been conducted where organizational- level interventions were implemented in 10 knowledge-intensive companies. The aim was to re-design the daily work practices by using a multi-level, participatory and salutogenic approach. Participants from multi-organizational levels were thus seen as an integrated part of the whole process, including development, design and implementation, and not merely objects exposed to the intervention. The springboard for the changes was thus the local, shared understanding of the workplace and the externalization of individual knowledge regarding problems and potential solutions. The findings suggest that it is possible to prevent work-related stress in knowledge work by adapting a multi-level, collaborative and participatory model which comprises a set of approaches, capabilities and activities that we find to be of key importance in primary interventions. These include managerial support, externalization of tacit knowledge, collective evaluations, adjustments and decisions, visualization of progress and current status, appointed facilitators and a number of defined phases and activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method and practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008, June). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, A., & Andersen, V. (2008). Knowledge work and stress – Beyond the job-strain model. In Conference proceeding from ODAM IX, International symposium on human factors in organizational design and management. Sao Paolo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, A., Andersen, V., & S¢rensen, O. H. (2009). Videnarbejde og stress – mellem begejstring og belastning. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahler-Larsen, P. (2001). From programme theory to constructivism. Evaluation, 7(3), 331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettinger, K. M., & Smith, M. J. (2006). Human factors in organizational design and management. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken: New Jersey. p. 513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, A. J., & Rosch, P. J. (1990). Promoting mental health at the workplace: The prevention side of stress management. Occupational Medicine: State of the Art Review, 5, 739–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksons, B. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (2002). Designing organizations. An executive guide to strategy, structure and process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., Brown, S., & Macanufo, J. (2010). Gamestorming: A playbook for innovators, rulebreaker, and changemakers (1st ed.). Gray & Brown: O’Reilly Media, Inc. Sebastopol, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C. (1997). Participatory evaluation. In R. E. Stake & L. Mabry (Eds.), Advances in program evaluation (pp. 171–189). Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. (1999). Organizational interventions. Facing the limits of the natural science paradigm. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 25(6), 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, J. J., & Murphy, L. R. (1996). Occupational stress intervention. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(4), 338–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, C. (2011). A participatory stress intervention process – The core of a self-help tool to successful preventive changes. Work and Well-being in an Economic Context, Orlando, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, C., & Andersen, V. (2011). Forebyg stress – i en fælles proces. København: DJØF’s forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, C., & Jensen, P. L. (2012). Organizational options for preventing work-related stress in knowledge work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(1), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, C., Jensen, P. L., & Andersen, V. (2010). Prevention of work-related stress – A participatory approach. In P. Vink & J. Kantola (Eds.), Advances in occupational, social and organizational ergonomics (pp. 305–314). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1968). Guide to quality control. Tokyo: JUSE Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancevich, J. M., Matteson, M. T., Freedman, S., & Phillips, J. S. (1990). Worksite stress management interventions. The American Psychologist, 45(2), 252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. 3700093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1981). Zukunftswerkstätten. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. (1990). Lower health risk with increase job control among white collar workers. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, A., & Galbraith, J. R. (2007). Designing your organization: Using the star model to solve 5 critical design challenges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Imprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompier, M., & Cooper, C. (Eds.). (1999). Preventing stress, improving productivity. European case studies in the workplace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompier, M., Geurts, S. A. E., Gründemann, R. W. M., Vink, P., & Smulders, P. G. W. (1998). Cases in stress prevention: The success of a participative and stepwise approach. Stress Medicine, 14, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kompier, M., Cooper, C., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2000). A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, T. S., Hannerz, H., H¢egh, A., & Borg, V. (2005). The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire – A tool for assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 31, 438–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClenahan, C. A., Giles, M. L., & Mallet, J. (2007). The importance of context specificity in work stress research: A test of the demand-control-support model in academics. Work and Stress, 21(1), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, M., Andersen, V., & Ipsen, C. (2008). Ambiguity, identity construction and stress amongst knowledge workers: Developing collective coping strategies through negotiations of meaning. International conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. R. (1988). Workplace interventions for stress reduction and prevention. In C. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping & consequences of stress at work (pp. 301–339). Chichester/New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L. R., & Sauter, S. L. (2003). The USA perspective: Current issues and trends in the management of work stress. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2002). SECI, ba, and leadership. In I. Nonaka & D. Teece (Eds.), Managing industrial knowledge – Creation, transfer and utilization (pp. 13–43). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., & Wall, T. D. (1999). Job and work design (1st ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1992). How to make our ideas clear. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Vol. 1. Selected philosophical writings‚ (1867–1893) (pp. 124–141). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R., Nielsen, K., & Tvedt, S. D. (2009). The development of five scales to measure employees’ appraisals of organizational-level stress management interventions. Work and Stress, 23(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–340). USA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosskam, E. (2009). Using participatory action research methodology to improve worker health. In P. L. Schnall, M. Dobson, & E. Rosskam (Eds.), Unhealthy work: Causes, consequences, cures (1st ed., pp. 211–228). Amityville: Baywood Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., & Sainfort, P. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 4(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, O. H., & Holman, D. (2010). Job-redesign in knowledge work. In P. Vink & J. Kantola (Eds.), Advances in occupation, social, and organizational ergonomics (pp. 111–120). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavroula, L., Griffiths, A., & Cox, T. (2003). Work organisation & stress. UK: Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In Making sense of the organization (1st ed., pp. 57–91). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westgaard, R. H., & Winkel, J. (2011). Occupation musculoskeletal and mental health: Significance of rationalization and opportunities to create sustainable production systems – A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 261–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1999). The burden of occupational illness. Office of Press and Public Relations. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (2007). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production, Toyota’s secret weapon in the global car wars that is revolutionizing world industry (New Ed.). London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement 

We would like to offer our special thanks to Senior Researcher Ole Henning Sørensen, University of Aalborg, Denmark, Senior Researcher Anders Buch, University of Aalborg, Denmark, and post.doc Liv Gish, Technical University of Denmark, for their valuable and constructive work during the planning, development and implementation of this research work. This project could not have succeeded without such a joint effort, which is very much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Ipsen Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ipsen, C., Andersen, V. (2013). A Multi-level and Participatory Model for Prevention of Work-Related Stress in Knowledge Work. In: Bauer, G., Jenny, G. (eds) Salutogenic organizations and change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6470-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics