Skip to main content

Mobility, Accessibility and Social Equity: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Empirical Study in the Metropolitan Areas of Milan, Bologna and Turin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 15))

Abstract

Although mobility is truly essential for access to urban assets and services and fundamental for social and urban integration, it tends to be unevenly distributed between individuals and social groups and does not always share the same quality relating to the resources used or the restrictions limiting their use. The inequalities relate both to the different social distribution of access resources and to the presence of restrictions which hinder their use. The objective of this study is to analyse the way in which the urban structure of residential areas influences the presence and availability of opportunities and how the location of residential areas and opportunities, combined with the residents’ mobility capital, influences their mobility styles and their accessibility to urban assets and services. The theoretical part of the study aims to explain the meaning of the concepts of mobility capital, mobility style and accessibility, while the empirical part aims to describe the relationship between residential location, mobility styles and access to opportunities. The study relates to a comparative Italian survey carried out in the metropolitan areas of Milan, Bologna and Turin in 2009–2010 by the Universities of Milan, Bologna and Turin.

The study has been carried out by an interdisciplinary group of research of the University of Milan Bicocca (Mario Boffi, Matteo Colleoni and Clara Melzi), University of Bologna (Giovanni Pieretti, Marco Castrignanò and Francesca Mantovani) and Polytechnic University of Turin (Cristina Pronello and Cristian Camusso).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an in-depth examination of the proximity and multi-scale concepts and their application to local planning tools, see Zedda (2009).

  2. 2.

    For an in-depth examination of the ‘urban time policies’ in Italy, see Irer (2009) and Mareggi (2000, 2011).

  3. 3.

    The English term ‘time-budget’ is the most useful survey method to collect data on the use of time and space of representative samples. For an in-depth examination, see Colleoni (2004).

  4. 4.

    By peri-urban we mean the area of settlements stretching between the boundaries of the historical cities and the low-density area, at times inappropriately called countryside (Martinotti 1999).

References

  • Allemand S (2008) Apprendre la mobilité, Les ateliers mobilité: une expérience originale. Le Cavalier Bleu, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Balducci A, Fedeli V, Pasqui G (2008) In movimento: confini, popolazioni e politiche nel territorio milanese. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet M, Crane R (2001) The influence of land use on travel behavior: empirical strategies. Transp Res A Policy Pract 35(9):823–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlini B, Memo F (2009) Ripensare l’accessibilità. Paper 2/2009. Cittalia – Fondazione Anci Ricerche, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass N, Shove E, Urry J (2005) Social exclusion, mobility and access. Sociol Rev 53:539–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Gorham R (1995) Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhood. J Am Plann Assoc 61:210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Rec D Transp Environ 3:199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier M (2005) L’usage et l’accès à l’automobile: une liberté sous contraintes pour les personnes et ménages à faibles ressources. Puca, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleoni M (2004) I tempi sociali. Teorie e strumenti di analisi. Carocci Editore, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleoni M (2011) Urban mobility, accessibility and social equity, a comparative study in four European metropolitan areas. In: Pellegrino G (ed) The politics of proximity: mobility and immobility in practice. Ashgate, London, pp 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleoni M, Bergamaschi M, Martinelli F (eds) (2009) La città: bisogni, desideri, diritti, Dimensioni spazio-temporali dell’esclusione urbana. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2007) Green paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobility. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie G (2010) Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. J Transp Geogr 18:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Richardson T, Smyth P, Vella-Brodrick D, Hine J, Lucas K, Stanley J, Morris J, Kinnear R, Stanley J (2009) Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne preliminary results. Transp Policy 16:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Transport (2010a) National travel survey. Transport Statistics Bulletin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Transport (2010b) Measuring public transport accessibility levels. Transport for London. http://data.london.gov.uk/documents/PTAL-methodology.pdf

  • Dijst M, Schenkel W, Thomas I (2002) Governing cities on the move, functional and management perspectives on transformations of European urban infrastructures, Urban and regional planning and development. Ashgate publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy G, Coutard O, Fol S, Froud J, Williams K (2005) La pauvreté entre assignation territoriale et dépendance automobile: comparaison France/Royaume-Uni. Université Paris X; Latts/enpc; Université de Manchester. Rapport pour le PREDIT-PUCA, Paris, Univ. Paris X, LATTS-ENPC, Univ. de Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Cervero R (2001) Travel and the built environment. Transp Res Rec 1780:87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamm M, Kaufmann V (2006) Operationalising the concept of motility: a qualitative study. Mobilities 1(2):167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman B, Gordon S, Peers JB (1992) The effect of neotraditional design on travel characteristics. Compendium of technical papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Anchorage, Alaska, 1992 District 6 annual meeting, pp 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco M, Turner J, Hine J (2000) Transport, employment and social exclusion: changing the contours through information technology. http://www.geocities.com/transport_and_society/newvision.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2012

  • Handy S (2002) Accessibility vs. mobility, enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the U.S. Institute for Transportation Studies, UC Davies

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL, Clifton KJ (2001) Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 28(4):317–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE (2002) How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. Am J Prev Med 23(2S):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land-use. J Am Plann Inst 25:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icma – International City/County Management Association (2011) Getting to smart growth II, 100 more policies for implementation. Smart Growth Network, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Irer – Istituto Regionale di Ricerca della Regione Lombardia (2009) Governare il tempo: sostenere le capacità progettuali degli enti locali in materia di politiche temporali sul territorio regionale, Rapporto finale. Irer, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Isfort – Istituto Superiore Formazione e Ricerca per i Trasporti (2011) La domanda di mobilità degli italiani. Audimob: Osservatorio sui comportamenti di mobilità degli italiani, Rapporto congiunturale di metà anno. Irer, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann V, Bergman MM, Joye D (2004) Motility: mobility as capital. Int J Urban Reg Res 28(4):745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek K (2003) Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land use travel behavior research and regional modeling. J Plan Educ Res 22(3):270–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulash W, Anglin J, Marks D (1990) Traditional neighborhood development: will the traffic work? Development 21:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton E (2005) Bouger pour s’en sortir. Mobilité quotidienne et intégration sociale. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J, Inam A, Torng GW (2005) A choice-based rationale for land use transportation alternatives: evidence from Boston and Atlanta. J Plan Educ Res 24:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2003) Measuring transportation, traffic, mobility and accessibility. Inst Transp Eng 73(10):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2009) Community cohesion as a transport planning objective. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas K (ed) (2004) Running on empty. Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. The Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas K, Grosvenor T, Simpson R (2001) Transport, the environment and social exclusion. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareggi M (2000) Le politiche temporali urbane in Italia. Alinea Editrice, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareggi M (2011) Ritmi urbani. Maggioli Editore, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinotti G (ed) (1999) La dimensione metropolitana. Sviluppo e governo della nuova città. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally M, Ryan S (1993) Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs. Transp Res Rec 1607:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignot D et al (2001) Mobilité et grande pauvreté. Rapport final, Novembre 2001, recherche financée par le PREDIT et l’UTP, LET – Agence d’Urbanisme pour le développement de l’agglomération lyonnaise – Observatoire Social de Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrey AT, Davis R, Stimson J, Ferreira L (1998) Public transportation access. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 3(5):319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess P (2006) Accessibility, activity participation and location of activities: exploring the links between residential location and travel behaviour. Urban Stud 43(3):627–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman PWG, Kenworthy JR (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuvolati G (2002) Popolazioni in movimento, città in trasformazione. Abitanti, pendolari, city users, uomini d’affari e flâneurs. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuvolati G (2007) Mobilità quotidiana e complessità urbana. University Press, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston J, Rajé F (2007) Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. J Transp Geogr 15:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pushkarev BS, Zupan JM (1977) Public transportation and land use policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1993) Capabilities and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 30–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • SEU – Social Exclusion Unit (2003) Making the connections: transport and social exclusion. Final report London ODPM, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J, Vella-Brodrick D (2009) The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport. Transp Policy 16:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry J (2002) Mobility and proximity. Sociology 36(2):255–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedda R (2009) Tempi della città, Metodi per l’analisi urbana. Principi e pratiche dell’urbanistica temporale. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Colleoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colleoni, M. (2013). Mobility, Accessibility and Social Equity: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Empirical Study in the Metropolitan Areas of Milan, Bologna and Turin. In: Henckel, D., Thomaier, S., Könecke, B., Zedda, R., Stabilini, S. (eds) Space–Time Design of the Public City. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6425-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics