Skip to main content

Theorizing Governability – The Interactive Governance Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 7))

Abstract

This chapter presents the conceptual foundations of governability and interactive governance upon which it is based. Interactive governance is a theoretical perspective that emphasizes the governing roles of state, market and civil society. Interactions between these realms are argued to be an important factor in the success or failure of whatever governance takes place. Governability refers to the quality of governance in a societal field, such as fisheries. Diversity, complexity, dynamics and scale are argued to be major variables influencing the governability of societal systems and their three components: a system-to-be-governed, a governing system and a system of governing interactions mediating between the two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armitage, D., & Johnson, D. (2006). Can resilience be reconciled with globalization in the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in Asian coastal regions. Ecology and Society, 11, 1. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art2

  • Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. (2001). Marine resource management: Conflict and regulation in the fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. (2005). Understanding fisheries conflicts in the South – A legal pluralist perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 18(9), 805–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Current principles. In J. Kooima, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 245–264). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Diallo, M., van der Heijden, P., Kooiman, J., Mahon, R., Williams, S. (2005). Interactive fisheries governance: A guide to better practice. Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., & Salagrama, V. (2008). Assessing the governability of capture fisheries in the Bay of Bengal - a conceptual enquiry. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 13 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Hughes, T.P., Steneck, R.S., Wilson, J.A., Bellwood, D.R., Crona, B., Folke, C., Gunderson, L.H., Leslie, H.M., Norberg, J.H., Nyström, M., Olsson, P., Österblom, H., Scheffer, M., Worm, B. (2006). Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science, 311, 1557–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J., Eising, R., Maloney, W. (2008). Researching interest groups politics in Europe and elsewhere (Introduction Special Issue). West European Politics, 31(6), 1103–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K.E. (1956). The image. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Three forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J.M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis technique. Public Management Review, 6, 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., Karlsen, G.R., Søreng, A. (2004). In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 47, 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S., & Oosterveer, P. (2007). The missing link: Governance and trade in the space of place and the space of flows. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(4), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, A.T. (2001). Sustainable fishery systems. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Degnbol, P., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Johnson, D., Pullin, R., Williams, S. (2005). Challenges and concerns in capture fisheries and aquaculture. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 25–37). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Kooiman, J., Pullin, R.S.V. (2008). Assessing governability of capture fisheries, aquaculture, and coastal zones. Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 20 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (2002). Why we cannot know complex things completely. Emergence, 4(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Andrade, R., Antunes, P., van den Belt, M., Boesch, D., Boersma, D., Catarino, F., Hanna, S., Limburg, K., Low, B., Molitor, M., Pereira, J.G., Rayner, S., Santos, R., Wilson, J., Young, M. (1998). Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science, 281, 198–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degnbol, P., Gislason, H., Hanna, S., Jentoft, S., Nielsen, J.R., Sverdrup-Jensen, S, Wilson, D.C. (2006). Painting the floor with a hammer: Technical fixes in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 30, 534–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, P., & Resnick-Terry, P. (1999). Comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 1, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., & Reed, M. (2008). Governance: A code of multiple colours. Human Relations, 61(5), 597–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.E. Jr., Pollitt, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19, 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R.Q. (2005). Social capital and fisheries governance. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48(9–10), 753–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, T.S. (Ed.). (2005). Participation in fisheries governance. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, N.L., Hilborn, R., Defeo, G. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470, 386–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanich, Q., & Tsamenyi, M. (2009). Managing fisheries and corruption in the Pacific Islands region. Marine Policy, 33(2), 386–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, M. (2008). Rethinking small-scale fisheries compliance. Marine Policy, 32(4), 635–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing public policy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C.C. (1983). The tools of government. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C. (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. (1989). Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Marine Policy, 2, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits to governability? Institutional implications for ocean and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 4, 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 4, 530–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., & McCay, B. (2003). The place of civil society in fisheries management – A research agenda for fisheries co-management. In D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielsen, P. Degnbol (Eds.), The fisheries co-management experience: Accomplishments, challenges and prospects (pp. 293–306). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., van Son, T.C., Bjørkan, M. (2007). Marine protected areas: A governance system analysis. Human Ecology, 35, 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Bundy, A., Mahon, R. (2010). Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy, 34(6), 1315–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Pascual-Fernandez, J.J. (2011). What MPAs are for: On goal formation and displacement. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., Pascual-Fernandez, J.J., De la Cruz Modino, R., Gonzalez-Ramallal, M., Chuenpagdee, R. (2012). What stakeholders think about marine protected areas: Case studies from Spain. Human Ecology, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10745-012-9459-6.

  • Jervis, R. (1989). The logic of images in international relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1997). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., Thorpe, A., Bavinck, M., Kulbicki, M. (2005). Links in the fish chain. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 133–146). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2010). Institutional adaptation as a governability problem in fisheries: Patron-client relations in the Junagadh fishery, India. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 264–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, A.M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2010). Governance and governability. In S.P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance (pp 87–104). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability – An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., & Bavinck, M. (2005). The governance perspective. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 11–25). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Governance and Governability. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 325–350). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta governance, values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., van Vliet, M., Jentoft, S. (Eds.). (1999). Creative governance: Opportunities for fisheries in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability – An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (2002). Civil society in African contexts: Reflections on the usefulness of a concept. Development and Change, 33(4), 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & Opoku-Mensah, A. (2006). Moving toward research agendas on international NGOs. Journal of international Development, 18, 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. (2001). The market system: What it is, how it works, and what to make. New Haven: Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(10), 986–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovan, W.R., Murray, M., Shaffer, R. (Eds.). (2004). Participatory governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R., Bavinck, M., Roy R.N. (2005). Governance in action. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 351–374). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R., McConney, P., Roy, R.N. (2008). Governing fisheries as complex adaptive systems. Marine Policy, 32, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, N., Newman, J., Barnett, C. (2010). Rethinking the public: Innovations in research, theory and politics. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoodwin, J.R. (1990). Crisis in the world’s fisheries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.S., Whitter, N., Robnett, B. (2002). Social movements. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikalsen, K.H., Hernes, H.K., Jentoft, S. (2007). Leaning on user-groups: The role of civil society in fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 31, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Bradley, R.L., Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.B. (1996). The civil society-state relationship in contemporary discourse: A complementary account from Gidden’s perspective. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8, 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (2005). Social movements: An anthropological reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. (2005). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 161, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyango, P., & Jentoft, S. (2010). Assessing poverty in small-scale fisheries in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S.P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y., & Warin, P. (2007). Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective? European Journal of Political Research, 46, 445–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, J.R., & Mitchell, R.E. (2005). Public participation as public debate: A deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Fernandez, J.J., Frangoudes, K., Williams, S. (2005). Local institutions. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 153–172). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In S.P. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 36–51). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raakjær, J. (2009). A fisheries management system in crisis – The EU Common Fisheries Policy. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems. Ecological Economics, 63, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, K., Hviding, E., Johannes, R.E. (1992). Marine resources management in the context of customary tenure. Marine Resource Economics, Marine Resources Foundation, 7, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. (Ed.). (1999). Theories of the public policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, A. (1999). The market revolution and its limits. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Houndsmill: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, A.M, & Chuenpagdee, R. (2010). Operationalizing governability: A case study of Lake Malawi. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez de Vivero, J.L., Rodriguez Mateos, J.C., Florido del Coral, D. (2005). International institutions. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 197–216). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez de Vivero, J.L., Rodriguez Mateaos, J.C., Florido del Corral, D. (2008). The paradox of public participation in fisheries governance: The rising number of actors and the devolution process. Marine Policy, 32, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumaila, U.R., & Dominguez-Torreiro, M. (2010). Discount factors and the performance of alternative fisheries governance systems. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 278–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, A. (2012). Alternatives to crisis: Social movements in global fisheries governance. Human Geography, 5, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (2005). Principles of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, A., Johnson, D., Bavinck, M. (2005). System to be Governed: Introduction. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 41–45). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Peters, B.G., Pierre, J., Sørensen, E. (Eds.). (2012). Interactive governance advancing the paradigm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schans, J.W. (2001). Governance of marine resources – Conceptual clarifications and two case studies. Delft: Eburon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder, R., Van der Zwart, A. (2006). International business-society management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (Ed.). (2000). Explaining corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A. (2006). Matching social and ecological systems in complex ocean fisheries. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 9. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art9

  • Wilson 2010 and Costanza et al 1998 can be deleted from the text. Song and Chuenpagdee = Song, A.M, and R.Chuenpagdee 2010, Operationalizing governability: a case study of Lake Malawi. Fish and fisheries 11: 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.C., Nielsen, J.R., Degnbol, P. (Eds.). (2003). The fisheries co-management Experience: Accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (1989). Whose leeper? Social science and moral obligation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1989). A framework for capacity building in policy analysis and economic management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2004). Saving fish and fishers. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarten Bavinck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M. (2013). Theorizing Governability – The Interactive Governance Perspective. In: Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., Kooiman, J. (eds) Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture. MARE Publication Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6107-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics