Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 1))

  • 1410 Accesses

Abstract

When dealing with logic, the following three questions naturally arise:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 8.60).

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 28 B 12.3.

  3. 3.

    Plato, Philebus, 28 d 6–9.

  4. 4.

    Plato, Gorgias, 508 a 3.

  5. 5.

    Plato, Timaeus, 28 c 3–4.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., 29 a 6–7.

  7. 7.

    Aristotle, Metaphysica, Λ 7, 1072 b 14.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., Λ 7, 1072 b 19–20.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., Λ 7, 1071 b 12–13.

  10. 10.

    Aristotle, Ethica Eudemea, Θ 2, 1248 a 26–27.

  11. 11.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 2.1).

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 28 B 8.60.

  13. 13.

    Plato, Timaeus, 90 c 7–d 1.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 47 c 3.

  15. 15.

    Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea, K 7, 1177 a 13–16.

  16. 16.

    Aristotle, Metaphysica, Λ 7, 1072 b 24–25.

  17. 17.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 1.2–3).

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 28 B 2.4.

  19. 19.

    Plato, Phaedrus, 270 c 10–d 1.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 270 d 9–e 2.

  21. 21.

    Aristotle, Metaphysica, α 3, 995 a 12–13.

  22. 22.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 7.1).

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 22 B 8.11.

  24. 24.

    Plato, Phaedo, 90 b 7.

  25. 25.

    Plato, Sophista, 227 a 8.

  26. 26.

    Aristotle, Sophistici Elenchi, 34, 183 a 37–38.

  27. 27.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 1.28–29).

  28. 28.

    Plato, Respublica, VII 532 a 7–b 2.

  29. 29.

    Aristotle, Analytica Priora, A 32, 47 a 2–4.

  30. 30.

    Aristotle, Analytica Posteriora, A 2, 71 a 19.

  31. 31.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 28 B 7.5).

  32. 32.

    Ibid., 28 B 3.1.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., 28 B 8.35–36.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 28 B 4.1. Clement of Alexandria, through whom we know this passage, comments on it by saying that intuition is necessary because there are things which are never seen “with our eyes, but only with our intuition [nooi]” (Ibid., 28 B 4). Empedocles echoes the passage in question: “Gaze [derkeu] with intuition [nooi]” (Ibid., 31 B 17.21).

  35. 35.

    Plato, Parmenides, 135 e 2–3.

  36. 36.

    Plato, Respublica, VI 511 d 8.

  37. 37.

    Aristotle, Topica, A 1, 100 a 25.

  38. 38.

    Aristotle, Analytica Posteriora, B 19, 100 b 7–8.

  39. 39.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 22 A 20).

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 22 B 1.

  41. 41.

    Ibid., 22 A 16.

  42. 42.

    Ibid., 22 B 2.

  43. 43.

    The Shabaka Stone, col. 53.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., col. 57.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., col. 54.

  46. 46.

    Plato, Timaeus, 52 d 3–4.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 52 e 1–5.

  48. 48.

    Ibid., 30 a 3–5.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., 30 b 3–5.

  50. 50.

    Ibid., 30 b 7–c 1.

  51. 51.

    Solon 4.32 (West).

  52. 52.

    Euripides, Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta (Nauck), fr. 910.

  53. 53.

    Ibid.

  54. 54.

    Diels and Kranz (1964, 59 B 12).

  55. 55.

    Ibid.

  56. 56.

    Ibid.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 59 A 48.

  58. 58.

    Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Dogmaticos, II.328.

  59. 59.

    Aristotle, Sophistici Elenchi, 34, 183 b 34–36.

  60. 60.

    Ibid., 34, 184 b 1–3.

  61. 61.

    Diogenes Laertius, Vitae Philosophorum, VII.41.

  62. 62.

    Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, I.22.

  63. 63.

    Alexander of Aphrodisias, In Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum Librum Primum Commentarium (Wallies), 1.3–5.

  64. 64.

    Aristotle, Topica, A 14, 105 b 19–21.

  65. 65.

    Aristotle, De Generatione Animalium, B 8, 747 b 28–30.

  66. 66.

    Aristotle, Analytica Posteriora, A 11, 77 a 31–32.

  67. 67.

    Barnes (1993, 173).

  68. 68.

    Aristotle, Sophistici Elenchi, 34, 183 a 39.

  69. 69.

    Aristotle never uses the titles Prior Analytics and Posterior Analytics. They were probably added by later editors to designate two parts of a single work. Aristotle only uses ta analutika.

  70. 70.

    Aristotle, Topica, Θ 13, 162 b 31–32.

  71. 71.

    For example, Aristotle uses hodos in Analytica Priora, A 30, 46 a 3.

  72. 72.

    Plato, Phaedrus, 270 b 1–2.

  73. 73.

    Ibid., 270 b 4–5.

  74. 74.

    Ibid., 270 c 4–5.

  75. 75.

    Aristotle, Topica, A 3, 101 b 5–6.

References

  • Barnes, Jonathan. 1993. Commentary. In Aristotle, Posterior analytics, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 81–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diels, Hermann Alexander, and Walther Kranz (eds.). 1964. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cellucci, C. (2013). The Origin of Logic. In: Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics