Abstract
The question of what explains policy changes has been of much scholarly and practical interest. Of no less interest is the question of what explains long periods of policy stalemate, especially in situations where the risks generated by prolonged inaction due to policy impasses are obvious. This chapter attempts to explain the stalemate in Israel’s water policy during the two decades between 1980 and 2000, a stalemate that persisted despite consensus on the gravity of the status quo, the inadequacy of existing policies and the risks of the continuing impasse. The chapter also tries to identify the factors that account for policy changes in the 2000s. We analyze both policy impasse and policy change using the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theoretical frameworks developed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder, 1993).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
World Resources Institute 1996; using WB terminology on per capita availability of fresh water: below 1,700 = stress; below 1,000 = scarcity; below 800 = crisis. Some add: below 500 = absolute scarcity. Hinrichsen, D., Robey, B., and U.D. Upadhyay, Solutions for a Water-Short World. Population Reports, Series M, No. 14. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, Chapter 3.2, http://www.jhuccp.org/pr/m14edsum.stm
- 2.
Noga Blitz, director of consumption and licensing in the Water Commission, Protocol 5, 4: the basis of the agricultural allocation and the internal divisions among farmers and cooperative farms has not changed since 1960. Only the total quantity allocated to agriculture was reduced after the 1991 drought using 1989 as a reference year.
- 3.
Final report of the Parliamentary Inquiry Commission for investigation of water crisis, June 2002, 93.
- 4.
Opening remarks by Minister of Finance, Shochat, in the public announcement of the government’s decision on 3 August 2000.
- 5.
Amiram Cohen, “Finance Ministry reverses its opposition to desalination and water importation,” Ha’aretz, 7 June 2001 (emphasis added).
- 6.
In 1999 the Water Commissioner ordered a 40% reduction from the official 1989 quota (which is effectively less than a 40% cutback from actual use). Farmers received the instructions late and did not trust the government’s promise of compensation, so they ignored the order. In 2000, farmers reduced use of water from the national system by 50% of the 1989 quota (effectively less than 40% of the previous year’s use). In 2001, the Water Commissioner recommended a reduction of 56%, but only 50% was approved. Farmers adhered to regulations and were compensated for losses. The 1999–2000 attempt to reduce agricultural allocations failed because compensation was not implemented. Attempts to reduce urban consumption in 2000–2001 by mandating behavior (such as forbidding lawn and park watering during summer months) also failed.
- 7.
Raveh, “The government approved reform in prices to agriculture – prices will be equalized to municipalities,” Globes, 29 April 2002.
- 8.
Ministry of Environment – http://www.sviva.gov.il/bin/en.jsp?enPage=bulletin&infocus=1&en Display=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=News%5El1628&enZone=february_bull04& enVersion=0&
- 9.
Avraham (Baiga) Shochat, phone interview to Gilad, May 2002.
- 10.
Substantiated by interviews with Gideon Shaffer (Interim Director of the National Security Council), Haim (Jumes) Oron (Minister of Agriculture), Mordechai (Kedmon) Cohen (Director of Planning in Agriculture Ministry), Moshe Izraeli (consultant to the Water Commission), and by copies of draft proposals provided to the author by interviewees (Gilad 2003).
- 11.
Finance Ministry spokesperson’s announcement on 16 April 2000 and 18 July 2000, Internet: http://press.info.gov.il/dover_show.asp
- 12.
In a May 2002 phone interview, former Minister of Finance Shochat emphasized that at the point of decision, it was clear to him that all the ministers were 100% supportive.
References
Cantor, M. (1984, December). Water in Israel and neighbouring countries. Unpublished paper (Hebrew).
Cantor, M. (1995). Water in Israel, perspectives into the 21st century (Research Article No. 9504). Rehovot: The Centre for Agricultural Economic Research (Hebrew).
Cantor, M. (1997). Interview with the first author, Kibbutz Ma’agan Michael, 1997.
Eisenstandt, S. N. (1967). Israeli society. London: Weindenfeld and Nicolson.
Feitelson, E. (2002). Implications of shifts in the Israeli water discourse for Israeli-Palestinian water negotiations. Political Geography, 21, 293–318.
Galnoor, I. (1978). Water policymaking in Israel. Policy Analysis, 4, 339–367.
Gilad, S. (2003). Policy undercurrent: An analysis of policymaking in Israel’s water sector 1990–2000 and beyond. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.
Hochman, E., & Hochman, O. (1991). A policy on efficient water pricing in Israel. Economic Quarterly, 42(150), 502–23 (Hebrew).
Keren, M. (1993). Economists and economic policy making in Israel: The politics of expertise in the stabilization program. Policy Sciences, 26, 331–346.
Menahem, G. (1998). Policy paradigms, policy networks and water policy in Israel. Journal of Public Policy, 18(3), 29–56.
Mossenson, R. (1991). The water crisis in Israel: Public regulation and financing and Government and Public Accounting. Economic Quarterly, 42(150), 479–87. (Hebrew).
Parliamentary Inquiry Commission of the Water Sector. (2002, June). Final report. Jerusalem: Government of Israel.
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 93–130.
Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Fostering the development of policy theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 261–76). Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Paul A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
State Comptroller. (1979). Israel, report no. 30, Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).
State Comptroller. (1986). Israel, report No. 37, 1986. Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).
State Comptroller. (1988). Israel, report No. 39, 1988. Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).
State Comptroller Report. (1990). Report on the management of water resources in Israel (p. 176). Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).
State Inquiry Commission for the investigation of the water crisis. (2010). Final report. Jerusalem: Government of Israel.
Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.
Woleman, et al. (1972). Report of the board of review on the water resources of the state of Israel, New York, cited in Ran Mossenson. (1986). The budget of water resources, a general, long-term perspective (p. 479). Jerusalem: Israel Treasury Department, Budget Division (Hebrew).
World Bank. (1994). Forging a partnership for environmental action: An environmental strategy toward sustainable development in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menahem, G., Gilad, S. (2013). Israel’s Water Policy 1980s–2000s: Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Stalemate, and Policy Change. In: Becker, N. (eds) Water Policy in Israel. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5911-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5911-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5910-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5911-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)