Skip to main content

Israel’s Water Policy 1980s–2000s: Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Stalemate, and Policy Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Policy in Israel

Part of the book series: Global Issues in Water Policy ((GLOB,volume 4))

Abstract

The question of what explains policy changes has been of much scholarly and practical interest. Of no less interest is the question of what explains long periods of policy stalemate, especially in situations where the risks generated by prolonged inaction due to policy impasses are obvious. This chapter attempts to explain the stalemate in Israel’s water policy during the two decades between 1980 and 2000, a stalemate that persisted despite consensus on the gravity of the status quo, the inadequacy of existing policies and the risks of the continuing impasse. The chapter also tries to identify the factors that account for policy changes in the 2000s. We analyze both policy impasse and policy change using the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theoretical frameworks developed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    World Resources Institute 1996; using WB terminology on per capita availability of fresh water: below 1,700 = stress; below 1,000 = scarcity; below 800 = crisis. Some add: below 500 = absolute scarcity. Hinrichsen, D., Robey, B., and U.D. Upadhyay, Solutions for a Water-Short World. Population Reports, Series M, No. 14. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, Chapter 3.2, http://www.jhuccp.org/pr/m14edsum.stm

  2. 2.

    Noga Blitz, director of consumption and licensing in the Water Commission, Protocol 5, 4: the basis of the agricultural allocation and the internal divisions among farmers and cooperative farms has not changed since 1960. Only the total quantity allocated to agriculture was reduced after the 1991 drought using 1989 as a reference year.

  3. 3.

    Final report of the Parliamentary Inquiry Commission for investigation of water crisis, June 2002, 93.

  4. 4.

    Opening remarks by Minister of Finance, Shochat, in the public announcement of the government’s decision on 3 August 2000.

  5. 5.

    Amiram Cohen, “Finance Ministry reverses its opposition to desalination and water importation,” Ha’aretz, 7 June 2001 (emphasis added).

  6. 6.

    In 1999 the Water Commissioner ordered a 40% reduction from the official 1989 quota (which is effectively less than a 40% cutback from actual use). Farmers received the instructions late and did not trust the government’s promise of compensation, so they ignored the order. In 2000, farmers reduced use of water from the national system by 50% of the 1989 quota (effectively less than 40% of the previous year’s use). In 2001, the Water Commissioner recommended a reduction of 56%, but only 50% was approved. Farmers adhered to regulations and were compensated for losses. The 1999–2000 attempt to reduce agricultural allocations failed because compensation was not implemented. Attempts to reduce urban consumption in 2000–2001 by mandating behavior (such as forbidding lawn and park watering during summer months) also failed.

  7. 7.

    Raveh, “The government approved reform in prices to agriculture – prices will be equalized to municipalities,” Globes, 29 April 2002.

  8. 8.

    Ministry of Environment – http://www.sviva.gov.il/bin/en.jsp?enPage=bulletin&infocus=1&en Display=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=News%5El1628&enZone=february_bull04& enVersion=0&

  9. 9.

    Avraham (Baiga) Shochat, phone interview to Gilad, May 2002.

  10. 10.

    Substantiated by interviews with Gideon Shaffer (Interim Director of the National Security Council), Haim (Jumes) Oron (Minister of Agriculture), Mordechai (Kedmon) Cohen (Director of Planning in Agriculture Ministry), Moshe Izraeli (consultant to the Water Commission), and by copies of draft proposals provided to the author by interviewees (Gilad 2003).

  11. 11.

    Finance Ministry spokesperson’s announcement on 16 April 2000 and 18 July 2000, Internet: http://press.info.gov.il/dover_show.asp

  12. 12.

    In a May 2002 phone interview, former Minister of Finance Shochat emphasized that at the point of decision, it was clear to him that all the ministers were 100% supportive.

References

  • Cantor, M. (1984, December). Water in Israel and neighbouring countries. Unpublished paper (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, M. (1995). Water in Israel, perspectives into the 21st century (Research Article No. 9504). Rehovot: The Centre for Agricultural Economic Research (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, M. (1997). Interview with the first author, Kibbutz Ma’agan Michael, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstandt, S. N. (1967). Israeli society. London: Weindenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson, E. (2002). Implications of shifts in the Israeli water discourse for Israeli-Palestinian water negotiations. Political Geography, 21, 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, I. (1978). Water policymaking in Israel. Policy Analysis, 4, 339–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, S. (2003). Policy undercurrent: An analysis of policymaking in Israel’s water sector 1990–2000 and beyond. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, E., & Hochman, O. (1991). A policy on efficient water pricing in Israel. Economic Quarterly, 42(150), 502–23 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keren, M. (1993). Economists and economic policy making in Israel: The politics of expertise in the stabilization program. Policy Sciences, 26, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menahem, G. (1998). Policy paradigms, policy networks and water policy in Israel. Journal of Public Policy, 18(3), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossenson, R. (1991). The water crisis in Israel: Public regulation and financing and Government and Public Accounting. Economic Quarterly, 42(150), 479–87. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Inquiry Commission of the Water Sector. (2002, June). Final report. Jerusalem: Government of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Fostering the development of policy theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 261–76). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Paul A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Comptroller. (1979). Israel, report no. 30, Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Comptroller. (1986). Israel, report No. 37, 1986. Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Comptroller. (1988). Israel, report No. 39, 1988. Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Comptroller Report. (1990). Report on the management of water resources in Israel (p. 176). Jerusalem: Government Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Inquiry Commission for the investigation of the water crisis. (2010). Final report. Jerusalem: Government of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woleman, et al. (1972). Report of the board of review on the water resources of the state of Israel, New York, cited in Ran Mossenson. (1986). The budget of water resources, a general, long-term perspective (p. 479). Jerusalem: Israel Treasury Department, Budget Division (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1994). Forging a partnership for environmental action: An environmental strategy toward sustainable development in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gila Menahem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table A.1 Expected increase in water supply by governmental decisions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menahem, G., Gilad, S. (2013). Israel’s Water Policy 1980s–2000s: Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Stalemate, and Policy Change. In: Becker, N. (eds) Water Policy in Israel. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5911-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics