Skip to main content

Authentic Assessment, Teacher Judgment and Moderation in a Context of High Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Designing Assessment for Quality Learning

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 1))

Abstract

As we enter the second decade of the twenty-first century, the use of authentic assessment as a school-based assessment has become increasingly important in various educational systems that are working towards realigning their desired educational outcomes to meet twenty-first century skills and competencies. Using clearly stated success criteria and standards in authentic assessment has enabled the practices of assessment for learning to occur in daily classroom instruction. One of the key conditions for using school-based authentic assessments as an effective leverage point in education reform is that teachers need to possess not only a high level of assessment literacy, but also additional agency and autonomy in their roles as competent assessors and moderators of the quality of students’ work. This chapter uses the country of Singapore to illustrate how teachers need additional agency and autonomy in their professional judgment of students’ work, if the enabling power of school-based authentic assessments is to be used to promote student learning of twenty-first century skills and competencies in a high-accountability context. Some recommendations for teacher professional development in using assessment criteria and standards to judge the quality of students’ work through social moderation practice are also discussed.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archbald, D. A., & Porter, A. C. (1994). Curriculum control and teachers’ perceptions of autonomy and satisfaction. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, M. Y. S., & Koh, K. (2012). Teachers competencies in school-based assessment for design and technology. Paper presented to the Joint Australian Association for Research in Education and Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2012). A systems level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: Moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgement. Policy Futures, 10(4), 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McCloskey, L. (2008). Assessment for learning around the world: What would it mean to be internationally competitive?. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2001). Characteristics of performative cultures: Their central paradoxes and limitations as resources for educational reform.. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore Government Press Release Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the Opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. B., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In S. K. Lee, C. B. Goh, B. Fredriksen, & J. P. Tan (Eds), Toward a better future: Education and training for economic development in Singapore since 1965. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2005). Trusting teachers’ judgement: Research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers’ assessment used for summative purposes. Research Papers in Education, 20(3), 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R., & Hodgen, E. (2011). National standards, moderation challenges, and teacher learning. Paper presented to the Symposium on Assessment and Learner Outcomes, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2010). Standards, teacher judgement and moderation in contexts of national curriculum and assessment reform. Assessment Matters, 1, 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, K. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, K., & Luke, A. (2009). Authentic and conventional assessment in Singapore schools: An empirical study of teacher assignments and student work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Ladwig, J., Mills, M., Bahr, M., Chant, D., Warry, M., Ailwood, J., Capeness, R., Christie, P., Gore, J., Hayes, D., & Luke, A. (2001). The Queensland school reform longitudinal study. Brisbane: Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. S. (2006). Quality management of school-based assessments: Moderation of teacher judgments. Paper presented to the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. S. (2009). Defining standards for the 21st century. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century: Connecting theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2005). Teach less, learn more, Singapore education milestones 2004-2005. http://moe.edu.sg/about/yearbooks/2005/teach.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2009.

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2008). Recent developments in Singapores education system: Gearing up for 2015. Singapore: International Education Leaders’ Dialogue, Third Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2009). Report of the Primary Education Review and Implementation Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2010). Report of the Secondary Review and Implementation Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M, et al. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2012). Framework for 21st Century learning. <www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework>. Accessed 1 March 2012 .

  • Queensland Studies Authority. (2010). School-based assessment: The Queensland system. The State of Queensland: Queensland Studies Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., & Wilson, M. (1998). An integrated assessment system as a medium for teacher change and the organization factors that mediate science teachersprofessional development’, BEAR Report Series, SA-98-2. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, R. D. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellan, R., Chong, K., & Tay, C. (2006). Assessment shifts in the Singapore education system. Paper presented to the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work?. In D. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C., & Gunn, S. (2009). Towards theorizing assessment as critical inquiry. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds), Educational assessment in the 21st Century: Connecting theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Koh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koh, K. (2014). Authentic Assessment, Teacher Judgment and Moderation in a Context of High Accountability. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., Colbert, P. (eds) Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics