Abstract
Space telescopes are essential for advancing our understanding of the physics ofthe cosmos. The vacuum environment of space means the light entering theaperture of a space telescope has not suffered any atmospheric extinction,enabling observations in ultraviolet, far-infrared, and X-ray wavelengths. Atwavelengths that are accessible from both space and ground-based facilities,the sky background levels in space are considerably lower than those atground-based sites, particularly in the near and mid-infrared. The lack ofatmospheric turbulence allows space telescopes to obtain diffraction-limitedimage quality without the need for adaptive optics. Their inherently highstability, and ability to observe for long continuous periods of time, allowsobservations to be performed from space that are difficult or impossible toaccomplish from the ground. In Sect. 1, comparisons are made between thesensitivities, spatial resolutions, and exposure times for ground- and space-basedobservatories.
Fundamentally, the science objectives drive the design of a space telescope, but thesehave to be balanced by the technological maturity of the space systems needed,the availability of suitable launch vehicles, and ultimately the overall mission cost.Today, it is normal practice to use cost models to attempt to capture the physicalparameters that drive cost. If the early estimates of mission cost become too large,science objectives may have to be reduced, or new technologies developed and themission redesigned accordingly. In Sect. 3, the types of high-level tradesthat have to be made in designing and building a space observatory arediscussed.
To illustrate the kind of trades that are undertaken, three space telescopes thathave different science objectives and span nearly 30 years in launch dates aredescribed: the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), Spitzer Space Telescope (SST), andthe James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Overviews of the three missions aregiven in Sect. 2. HST is a warm observatory with a 2.4 m primary mirror diameterin low Earth orbit launched in 1990. It observes in ultraviolet, optical, andnear-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. SST is a cold infrared observatory with a 0.85 mprimary mirror in a drift-away orbit launched in 2003. JWST will be a cold,infrared observatory with a 6.6 m primary mirror in orbit at the second Lagrangepoint of the Earth-Sun system (L2). JWST is currently scheduled to launch in2018.
Different orbits were selected for HST, SST, and JWST, as discussed in Sect. 4. Alow Earth orbit was chosen for HST to allow for human servicing that changedand improved the observatory over its multi-decade lifetime. SST’s heliocentricdrift-away orbit was selected because it minimized the mission mass and allowedthe observatory to continually radiate heat into deep space, but contact with themission will eventually be lost. JWST’s orbit about the metastable Sun-EarthLagrange Point 2 (L2) keeps the Sun, Earth, and Moon constantly behind itssophisticated sunshield, enabling the telescope assembly to passively cool to 40 K,operate in a highly stable thermal environment, and stay in constantcommunication with the ground system for its 10-year mission using NASA’s DeepSpace Network (DSN).
The ratios of telescope aperture diameter to launch volume and mass haveincreased over time, as discussed in Sect. 5, driven by the need for missions to fitinto available launch vehicles. For HST and JWST, some components are folded tofit into the launch vehicles and are deployed after launch. JWST, in addition,requires that optical alignment be carried out on orbit because the opticsthemselves deploy after launch (Sect. 6.4).
Optical trades are discussed in Sect. 6. HST and SST are compact, two-mirrorCassegrain telescopes. HST minimizes the number of mirrors in order to achievereasonable throughput at ultraviolet wavelengths. JWST has a three-mirror designthat achieves a reasonable field of view to accommodate multiple instrumentsdespite the very large primary mirror diameter. The three-mirror design alsoproduces an accessible pupil, and a planar mirror and mask at that location areused for fine-pointing adjustments and stray light control. Because it operates inthe IR, JWST’s throughput remains high despite the additional reflections in thetelescope.
HST uses a glass primary with a low thermal expansion, which enabled it to bepolished to reach the lower surface errors required for observing at visible andultraviolet wavelengths. JWST and SST, operating in infrared wavelengths, wereable to make use of a beryllium primary mirror technology with much lowerareal density than that of HST’s light-weighted glass primary mirror. Theberyllium technology has excellent cryogenic properties as discussed in Sect. 6.3.
HST’s telescope and instruments operate near room temperature, with theexception of its actively cooled IR and CCD detector systems. HST experiences asomewhat unstable thermal environment because of its low Earth orbit, asdiscussed in Sect. 8. SST and JWST must operate cold to ensure that thesensitivity of the infrared detectors is limited by the shot noise from thedeep-space background rather than by infrared emission from the telescopestructure. SST uses a combination of passive cooling for the optics and activecooling for the detectors and instruments in order to reach their respectiveoperational temperatures in its drift-away orbit. JWST relies almost solely onpassive cooling in its orbit about the Sun-Earth L2 point, with the exception ofthe detectors on the mid-infrared instrument which are actively cooled by amechanical cooler.
Many of the science objectives for future space telescopes will build on thescience legacies of the telescopes covered in this chapter and will requirelarger primary mirror diameters. With a combination of greater angularresolution and higher sensitivity, future observatories will be capable ofdetecting signs of life on extrasolar planets, will reveal the mechanisms thatcontrol early galaxy formation, and will provide windows into new andunexplored regimes of the universe from ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths.Such missions are likely to make use of new, larger launch vehicles, butwill still need to fold more compactly for launch and have lower arealdensities than current observatories. Consequently, automatic deployments orin-space assembly will be required, as will on orbit optical alignment.Future large telescopes will likely also incorporate real-time active andadaptive optical and alignment control; such technology has been successfullydeveloped for the recent generation of very large ground-based telescopes.With its thermal stability and high observing efficiencies, L2 will continueto be an attractive orbit for these future missions. Other orbits mightbe selected if there is renewed interest in servicing these future “GreatObservatories.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Apai, D., Lagerstrom, J. P., Reid, I. N., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 808
Bahcall, J. N., & Soneira, R. M. 1984, ApJS, 55, 67
Balzano, V., Isaacs, J. C., & Nelan, E. P. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7016, 70161X
Bate, R. R., Mueller, D. D., & White, J. E. 1971, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics (New York: Dover)
Bely, P. Y. 2003, The Design and Construction of Large Optical Telescopes (New York: Springer)
Casani, J., et al. 2010a, JWST Test Assessment Team (TAT) Final Report. http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/re sources/JWST_TAT_Final_Report_100907.pdf
Casani, J., et al. 2010b, JWST Independent Comprehensive Review Panel (ICRP) Final Report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/499224main_JWST-ICRP_Report-FINAL.pdf
Cash, W., Kendrick, S., Noecker, C., et al. 2009, Proc. SPIE, 7436, 743606
Chaney, D. M., Hadaway, J. B., Lewis, J., Gallagher, B., & Brown, B. 2011, Proc. SPIE, 8150, 815008
Christian, C. A., & Davidson, G. 2006, in ASSL 335, Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy Vol. 6, ed. A. Heck (New York: Springer), 145
Clampin, M. 2011, Overview of the James Webb Space Telescope Observatory. Proc. SPIE, 8146, 814605
Davies, J. K. 1997, Astronomy from Space: The Design and Operation of Orbiting Observatories (New York: Wiley)
Davies, J. K. 2006, The Space Review. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/688/1
Den Hartog, J. P. 1961, Mechanics (New York: Dover)
Donabedian, M. 2003, Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook, Volume 2: Cryogenics (El Segundo: Aerospace Press)
Doxsey, R. E. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6270, 627006
Egerman, R., De Smitt, S., & Strafford, D., 2010, Low-weight, low-cost, low-cycle time replicated glass mirrors. Proc. SPIE, 7739, 77390G
Elachi, C., 1987, Introduction to Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing (New York: Wiley)
Gallagher, D. B., Irace, W. R., & Werner, M. W. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4850, 17
Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al. 2006, SpaceSciRev, 123, 485
Gerchberg, R. W., & Saxton, W. O. 1972, Optik, 35, 237
Gehrz, R. D., Roellig, T. L., Werner, M. W., et al. 2007, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 78, 011302
Giacconi, R. 2008, Secrets of the Hoary Deep (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)
Gillet, F. C., & Mountain, M. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 133, Science with the NGST (Next Generation Space Telescope), eds. E. P. Smith & A. Koratkur (San Francisco: ASP), 42
Gilmore, D. G. 2002, Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook, Volume 1: Fundamental Technologies (El Segundo: Aerospace Press)
Goddard Space Flight Center 1993, OTA/FGS Thermal Control System Description and Operating Manual (Greenbelt: NASA GSFC)
Goddard Space Flight Center 2010, On-Orbit Satellite Servicing Study: Project Report (Greenbelt: NASA GSFC)
Guyon, O. 2005, ApJ, 629, 592
Hickey, G., Barbee, T., Ealey, M., & Redding, D. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7731, 773120
Hopkins, R. A., Schweickart, R. B., Finley, P. T. & Volz, S. M. 2002, Proc. SPIE, 4850, 42
Kasdin, N. J., Cady, E. J., Dumont, P. J., et al. 2009, Proc. SPIE, 7440, 744005
Kasting, J., Traub, W., Roberge, A., et al. 2009, arXiv:0911.2936v1
Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79
Krist, J. E., & Burrows, C. J. 1995, Appl. Opt., 34, 4951
Lallo, M. 2012, Experience with the Hubble Space Telescope: 20 years of an archetype. Opt. Eng, 51, 011011
Lawson, P. R., Traub, W. A., & Unwin, S. C. 2009, Exoplanet Community Report, JPL Publication 09-3 (Pasadena: Jet Propulsion Laboratory)
Lee, J. H., Blalock, W., Brown, R. J., Volz, S. M., Yarnell, T., & Hopkins, R. A. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3435, 172
Lester, D. F., Benford, D. J., Blain, A., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 1507
Lightsey, P., Atkinson, C., Clampin, M., & Feinberg, L. 2012, James Webb Space Telescope: large deployable cryogenic telescope in space. Opt. Eng, 51, 011003
Lo, A. S., Glassman, R., Dailey, D., et al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7731, 77312E
Lockheed Missiles and Space Company, 1985, Space Telescope Systems Description Handbook, ST/SE-02 (Sunnyvale: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company)
Mainzer, A. K., & Young, E. T. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5487, 93
Matthews, G., Barrett, D., Bolton, J., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 5180, 169
Mountain, M., van der Marel, R., Soummer, R. et al. 2009, arXiv:0909.4503v1
Nakagawa, T. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7010, 70100H
Oke, J. B. 1974, ApJS, 27, 21
Oswald, H. W., Siegmund, B. Y., Welsh, C. M., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5488, 13
Parrish, K. 2004, in From Spitzer to Herschel and Beyond: The Future of Far-Infrared Space Astrophysics Conference (Pasadena). http://safir.jpl.nasa.gov/BeyondSpitzerConf/index.shtml
Pilbratt, G. L. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7010
Postman, M. 2009, arXiv:0904.0941v2
Prussing, J. E., & Conaway, B. A. 1993, Orbital Mechanics (New York: Oxford University Press)
Ramsay, S. K., Mountain, C. M., & Geballe, T. R. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 751
Rohsenow, W. M., Hartnett, J. P., & Cho, Y. I. 1998, Handbook of Heat Transfer (3rd ed.; New York: McGraw-Hill)
Sabelhaus, P. A., Campbell, D., Clampin, M., et al. 2005, Proc. SPIE, 5899, 58990P
Sato, et al. 2010, Conceptual design of a cryogenic system for the next-generation infrared space telescope SPICA. Proc. SPIE, 7731
Schroeder, D. J. 1987, Astronomical Optics (San Diego: Academic)
Space Telescope Science Institute 2010, FGS Instrument Handbook for Cycle 19 (Baltimore: STScI). http://www.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/design/hst/fgs/documents/instrumenthandbook/
Space Telescope Science Institute 2011, Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 19 (Baltimore: STScI). http://www.stsci.edu/hst/proposing/documents/primer/
Spitzer Science Center, 2011, Spitzer Space Telescope Handbook, Version 2.0 (Pasadena: SSC). http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/docs/spitzermission/missionoverview/spitzertelescopehandbook/home/
Stahl, H. P. 2010, Opt. Eng., 49, 053005
Strafford, D. N., DeSmitt, S. M., Kupinski, P. T., & Sebring, T. A. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6273, 62730R
Thomson, W. T. 1986, Introduction to Space Dynamics (New York: Dover)
Thronson, H., Lester, D., Watson, J., & Moe, R. 2005, in Report of the Space Resources Roundtable VII (Houston, TX: Lunar and Planetary Institute), 104
Trauger, J. T., & Traub, W. A. 2007, Nature, 446, 771
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank many people that contributed greatly to this effort. Jill Lagerstrom provided invaluable help with the research, reference formats, and measurements of observatory papers and citations. Amy Gonigam and Elizabeth Fraser in the STScI library found every book and article that we could possibly have needed. George Hartig and Matt Lallo are reservoirs of HST program, hardware, and operation knowledge and also reviewed the chapter. Carl Biagetti kindly reviewed the chapter, and Remi Soummer reviewed the high-contrast imaging section. Chris Long and Tom Wheeler shared their highly detailed knowledge of HST’s hardware. Roeland van der Marel wisely directed us to Bely’s excellent book. Ed Nelan answered many pointing and tracking questions and expertly reviewed the section for us. Scott Friedman answered several general astronomy questions. Elizabeth Barker helped find reasonable assumptions for detector noise levels. Carol Christian provided current information on the Davidson metric. Tracy Beck and Marianne Takamiya (University of Hawai’i Hilo) provided information on Gemini’s seeing and background. Erick Young (SOFIA Science Center, Ames Research Center) graciously answered SST questions and reviewed the chapter. Conrad Schiff (GSFC) answered orbital questions. Randy Frank (BATC) was a valuable resource on thermal designs. Paul Lightsey (BATC) chatted with us about design choices for both HST and JWST. Chuck Bowers (GSFC) helpfully tracked down several JWST details for us. David Content (GSFC) and Robert Egerman (ITT) provided information on corrugated mirror technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Elliott, E., Mountain, M., Postman, M., Koekemoer, A., Ubeda, L., Livio, M. (2013). Space Telescopes in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Infrared (UV/O/IR). In: Oswalt, T.D., McLean, I.S. (eds) Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5621-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5620-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5621-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics