Abstract
Reichenbach always counted the solution of Hume’s problem of induction and his anticipation of the probabilistic nature of atomic physics among the signature achievements of his European years. In this paper I argue that until 1936 Reichenbach, more than anticipating quantum mechanical indeterminism, developed a philosophical research program whose core questions were already laid out in his Ph.D. thesis of 1915. There he supplemented the principle of causality by a second principle of probabilistic and inductive nature that, during the two decades to come, assumed the lead but repeatedly changed its form from a transcendental to an empirical and back to a transcendental-pragmatic principle. Reichenbach’s exchanges with Schrödinger (in 1923/1924) and Schlick (in 1930/1931) show that his abandonment of Kantian causality was not primarily motivated by the ongoing physical developments and the relationship between statistical and quantum physics. While Schrödinger considered quantum mechanics largely as a continuation of Boltzmann’s statistical mechanics and insisted on the physical character of measurement, Schlick held instead that Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation signified a radical difference between classical fluctuation and quantum phenomena. For Reichenbach, in those days, this problem—much discussed among the physicists—was of lesser importance because he insisted on the identity between the theory of measurement error and any probabilistic physical theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I translate here “Schwankungen” as ‘variations’ while I translate them as ‘fluctuations’ if they are intended as a physical process in its own right, which Reichenbach—as the present paper argues—does not assume.
- 2.
I am citing both the German original and the English translation, if available. At places I have however modified the English translation to restore a terminological relationship existing in the German original. Translations from German originals, where no translation was available, are mine.
- 3.
Eberhardt and Glymour here translate “einsehen” as “recognized”. I prefer “intuited” because it better captures Reichenbach’s argument; cf. the next paragraph.
- 4.
In Reichenbach 1916, Eberhardt and Glymour translate “Spielraum” as “event space”, rather than the commonly used “range”. This is certainly a good choice from a contemporary perspective, but hides the psychological aspects of the concept and the fact that it represents the “free play” left by the laws of nature – a view which Reichenbach explicitly criticizes. For this reason I leave the German expression untranslated.
- 5.
Made almost in passing in a 1886 address, cf. (Boltzmann 1905, 37/22).
- 6.
The German Gesetzmäßigkeit or Gesetzlichkeit stand between a strict law (Gesetz) and any nomologically weaker kind of statistically established regularity (Regel or Regelmäßigkeit).
- 7.
The respective passage from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (A 231, B 284) appears in a footnote on p. 122.
- 8.
The German original reads “wirklich” (p. 120), but the editors’ translation “possible” (p. 121).
- 9.
Among them Schlick’s very negative evaluation of Reichenbach’s work for the Prussian Ministry of Science, cf. Stadler (2011).
- 10.
The footnote originally appears in Reichenbach (1925, 139/118).
References
Boltzmann, Ludwig. 1905. Populäre Schriften. Leipzig: J.A. Barth; Part. Trans. as Theoretical physics and philosophical problems, ed. Brian McGuinness. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974.
Eberhardt, Frederick. 2011. Reliability via synthetic a priori: Reichenbach’s doctoral thesis on probability. Synthese 181: 125–136.
Exner, Franz S. 1919. Vorlesungen über die physikalischen Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaften. Leipzig/Wien: Franz Deuticke.
Fechner, Gustav T. 1897. In Kollektivmaßlehre, Leipzig: Engelmann.
Frank, Philipp. 1929. Was bedeuten die gegenwärtigen physikalischen Theorien für die allgemeine Erkenntnislehre? Die Naturwissenschaften 17: 971–7 & 987–94; English Trans. in Frank 1961. 96–125.
Frank, Philipp. 1932. Das Kausalgesetz und seine Grenzen. Wien: Springer; English Trans. as The law of causality and Its limits. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.
Frank, Philipp. 1937. Philosophische Deutungen und Mißdeutungen der Quantentheorie. Erkenntnis 6:303–317; English Trans. in Frank 1961, 158–170.
Frank, Philipp. 1961. Modern science and its philosophy. New York: Collier Books.
Friedman, Michael. 1994. Geometry, convention, and the relativized a priori: Reichenbach, Schlick, and Carnap. In Logic, language, and the structure of scientific theories, ed. Wesley Salmon, and Gereon Wolters. 21–34. Pittsburgh, PA–Konstanz: University of Pittsburgh Press–Universitätsverlag Konstanz.
Galavotti, Maria Carla. 2011. On Hans Reichenbach’s inductivism. Synthese 181: 95–111.
Heidelberger, Michael. 2001. Origins of the logical theory of probability: von Kries, Wittgenstein, Waismann. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15: 177–188.
Mach, Ernst. 1883. Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung. Historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Leipzig: Brockhaus; English Trans. as The science of mechanics, La Salle, IL: Open Court 1989.
Padovani, Flavia. 2011. Relativizing the relativized a priori: Reichenbach’s axioms of coordination divided. Synthese 181: 41–62.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1916. The concept of probability in the mathematical represenation of reality. Trans. and ed. Frederick Eberhardt and Clark Glymour. Chicago: Open Court, 2008; orig. as Der Begriff der Wahrscheinlichkeit für die mathematischer Darstellung der Wirklichkeit. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 161:210–239 & 162:9–112, 223–253.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1920a. Die physikalischen Voraussetzungen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Die Naturwissenschaften 8:46–55; Nachtrag, 349; English Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. II. 293–311.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1920b. Philosophische Kritik der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Die Naturwissenschaften 8:146–153; English Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. II. 312–327.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1920c. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis apriori. Berlin: Springer; English Trans. as The theory of relativity and a priori knowledge, with an introduction by Maria Reichenbach, Berkeley: University of California Press 1965.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1921. Review of Exner, Franz, Vorlesungen über die physikalischen Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaften. Die Naturwissenschaften 9: 414–415.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1924. Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1925. Die Kausalstruktur der Welt und der Unterschied von Vergangenheit und Zukunft. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung. 133–175; English Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. II. 81–119.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1929. Ziele und Wege der physikalischen Erkenntnis. In Handbuch der Physik. vol. 4. Berlin: Springer. 1–80; English Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. II. 120–225.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1930. Kausalität und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Erkenntnis 1:158–188; part. Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. II. 333–344.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1931. Das Kausalproblem in der Physik. Die Naturwissenschaften 19:713–722; English Trans. in Reichenbach 1978. vol. I. 326–42.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1932a. Die Kausalbehauptung und die Möglichkeit ihrer empirischen Nachprüfung. Erkenntnis 3:32–64; English Trans. in Reichenbach 197. vol. II. 345–371.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1932b. Schlußbemerkung. Erkenntnis 3: 70–71.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1936. Logistic empiricism in Germany and the present state of its problems. Journal of Philosophy 33: 141–160.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1944. Philosophic foundations of quantum mechanics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1956. The direction of time. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1978. Selected writings 1909–1953. 2 vols. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Salmon, Wesley C. 1991. Hans Reichenbach’s vindication of induction. Erkenntnis 35: 99–122.
Schlick, Moritz. 1920. Naturphilosophische Betrachtungen über das Kausalprinzip. Die Naturwissenschaften 8:461–474, English Trans. in Schlick 1979. vol. I. 295–321.
Schlick, Moritz. 1925a. Naturphilosophie. In Lehrbuch der Philosophie: Die Philosophie in ihren Einzelgebieten, ed. Max Dessoir, 397–492. Berlin: Ullstein. English Trans. in Schlick 1979. vol. II. 1–90.
Schlick, Moritz. 1925b. Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
Schlick, Moritz. 1931. Die Kausalität in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Die Naturwissenschaften 19:145–162; English Trans. in Schlick 1979. vol. II. 176–209.
Schlick, Moritz. 1937. Quantentheorie und Erkennbarkeit der Natur. Erkenntnis 6:317–326; English Trans. in Schlick 1979. vol II. 482–490.
Schlick, Moritz. 1979. In Philosophical papers, ed. Henk Mulder and Barbara F.B. van de Velde-Schlick. 2 vols. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1919. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretische Studien betreffend Schweidler’sche Schwankungen, besonders die Theorie der Meßanordnung. Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abt. IIa, 128, 177–237.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1924. Bohrs neue Strahlungshypothese und der Energiesatz. Die Naturwissenschaften 12: 720–724.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1929a. Was ist ein Naturgesetz? Die Naturwissenschaften 17:9–11; English Trans. by James Murphy and W.H. Johnston as Science and the human temperament, 133–147. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1929b. Aus der Antrittsrede des neu in die Akademie eintretenden Herrn Schrödinger. Die Naturwissenschaften 17: 732; English Trans. in the Introd. to Science and the human temperament, xiii–xviii.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1932. Anmerkungen zum Kausalproblem. Erkenntnis 3: 65–70.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1934. Über die Unanwendbarkeit der Geometrie im Kleinen. Die Naturwissenschaften 22: 518–520.
Stadler, Friedrich. 2011. The road to Experience and Prediction from within: Hans Reichenbach’s scientific correspondence from Berlin to Istanbul. Synthese 181: 137–155.
Stöltzner, Michael. 2009. The logical empiricists. In Oxford handbook of causation, ed. Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock, and Peter Menzies, 108–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stöltzner, Michael. 2012a. Zur Genese der Schweidlerschen Schwankungen und der Brownschen Molekularbewegung. In Kernforschung in Österreich: Wandlungen eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes 1900–1978, ed. Silke Fengler and Carola Sachse, 309–340. Wien: Böhlau.
Stöltzner, Michael. 2012b. Erwin Schrödinger – Vienna indeterminist. In Probabilities, laws, and structures, ed. Marcel Weber et al., 481–495. Dordrecht: Springer.
Uffink, Jos. 2007. Compendium to the foundations of classical statistical physics. In Handbook for the philosophy of physics, ed. Jeremy Butterfield and John Earman, 924–1074. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Von Kries, Johannes. 1886. Prinzipien der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Freiburg i.B: Mohr.
Von Kries, Johannes. 1919. Über Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in der Physik. Die Naturwissenschaften 7:2–7 & 17–23
Von Mises, Richard. 1912. Über die Grundbegriffe der Kollektivmaßlehre. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 21: 9–20.
Von Mises, Richard. 1919. Fundamentalsätze der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Mathematische Zeitschrift 5: 52–99 & 100.
Von Mises, Richard. 1922. Über die gegenwärtige Krise der Mechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 10: 25–29.
Von Mises, Richard. 1930. Über kausale und statistische Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Physik. Die Naturwissenschaften 18:145–53 and In Erkenntnis 1:189–210.
Von Schweidler, Egon. 1906. Ueber Schwankungen der radioaktiven Umwandlung. In Premier Congrès International pour l’étude de la Radiologie et de l’Ionisation, tenue à Liège du 12 au 14 Septembre 1905. Comptes Rendus Section de Physique – Langue allemande, Paris: H. Dunod & E. Pinat, 1–3.
Von Smoluchowski, Marian. 1906. Zur kinetischen Theorie der Brownschen Molekularbewegung und der Suspensionen. Annalen der Physik 326: 756–780.
Waismann, Friedrich. 1930. Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs. Erkenntnis 1: 228–248.
Zilsel, Edgar, et al. 1930. Diskussion über Wahrscheinlichkeit. Erkenntnis 1: 260–285.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stöltzner, M. (2013). Did Reichenbach Anticipate Quantum Mechanical Indeterminism?. In: Milkov, N., Peckhaus, V. (eds) The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 273. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5485-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5485-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5484-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5485-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)