Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to show that organic codes played a key role in the origin and the evolution of mind as they had in all other great events of macroevolution. The presence of molecular adaptors has shown that the genetic code was only the first of a long series of codes in the history of life, and it is possible therefore that the origin of mind was associated with the appearance of new organic codes. This would cast a new light on mind and would give us a new theoretical framework for studying it. The scientific models that have been proposed so far on the nature of mind can be divided into three major groups that here are referred to as the computational theory, the connectionist theory and the emergence theory. The new approach is based on the idea that a neural code contributed to the origin of mind somehow like the genetic code contributed to the origin of life. This is the code model of mind, the idea that mental objects are assembled from brain components according to coding rules, which means that they are no longer brain objects but brain artefacts. The model implies that feelings and perceptions are not side effects of neural networks (as in connectionism), that they do not come into existence spontaneously by emergence and that they are not the result of computations, but of real manufacturing processes. In the framework of the code model, in short, feelings and perceptions are manufactured artefacts, whereas according to the other theories, they are spontaneous products of brain processes. This is relevant to the mind-body problem because if the mind were made of spontaneous products, it could not have rules of its own. Artefacts, on the other hand, can have such autonomous properties for two different reasons. One is that the rules of a code are conventions, and these are not dictated by physical necessity. The second is that a world of artefacts can have epigenetic properties that add unexpected features to the coding rules. The autonomy of the mind, in short, is something that spontaneous brain products cannot achieve whereas brain artefacts can.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Watson, J. D. (1994). Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland.
Baker, M. (2001). The atoms of language. The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. New York: Basic Books.
Barash, Y., Calarco, J. A., Gao, W., Pan, Q., Wang, X., Shai, O., Blencowe, B. J., & Frey, B. J. (2010). Deciphering the splicing code. Nature, 465, 53–59.
Barbieri, M. (1981). The ribotype theory on the origin of life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 91, 545–601.
Barbieri, M. (1985). The semantic theory of evolution. London/New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Barbieri, M. (1998). The organic codes. The basic mechanism of macroevolution. Rivista di Biologia-Biology Forum, 91, 481–514.
Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbieri, M. (2006). Semantic biology and the mind-body problem-the theory of the conventional mind. Biological Theory, 1(4), 352–356.
Barbieri, M. (2008). Biosemiotics: A new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577–599.
Barbieri, M. (2010). On the origin of language. Biosemiotics, 3, 201–223.
Bickerton, D. (1981). The roots of language. Karoma: Ann Arbour.
Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic minimalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boutanaev, A. M., Mikhaylova, L. M., & Nurminsky, D. I. (2005). The pattern of chromosome folding in interphase is outlined by the linear gene density profile. Molecular and Cell Biology, 18, 8379–8386.
Changeaux, J.-P. (1983). L’Homme Neuronal. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1993). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Scribner.
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.
DeHaan, R. L. (1959). Cardia bifida and the development of pacemaker function in the early chicken heart. Developmental Biology, 1, 586–602.
Dhir, A., Emanuele Buratti, E., van Santen, M. A., Lührmann, R., & Baralle, F. E. (2010). The intronic splicing code: Multiple factors involved in ATM pseudoexon definition. The EMBO Journal, 29, 749–760.
Edelman, G. M. (1989). Neural darwinism. The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Oxford University Press.
Flames, N., Pla, R., Gelman, D. M., Rubenstein, J. L. R., Puelles, L., & Marin, O. (2007). Delineation of multiple subpallial progenitor domains by the combinatorial expression of transcriptional codes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(36), 9682–9695.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Thomas Crowell Co.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gabius, H.-J. (2000). Biological information transfer beyond the genetic code: The sugar code. Naturwissenschaften, 87, 108–121.
Gabius, H.-J., André, S., Kaltner, H., & Siebert, H.-C. (2002). The sugar code: Functional lectinomics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1572, 165–177.
Gamble, M. J., & Freedman, L. P. (2002). A coactivator code for transcription. TRENDS in Biochemical Sciences, 27(4), 165–167.
Gilbert, S. F. (2006). Developmental biology (8th ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behaviour. New York: John Wiley.
Hilschmann, N., Barnikol, H. U., Barnikol-Watanabe, S., Götz, H., Kratzin, H., & Thinness, F. P. (2001). The immunoglobulin-like genetic predetermination of the brain: The protocadherins, blueprint of the neuronal network. Naturwissenschaften, 88, 2–12.
Holland, J. A. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 79, 2554–2558.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106–154.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1979). Brain mechanisms of vision. Scientific American, 241(3), 150–182.
Jacob, F. (1982). The possible and the actual. New York: Pantheon Books.
Jacob, F., & Monod, J. (1961). Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 3, 318–356.
Jessell, T. M. (2000). Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: Inductive signals and transcriptional codes. Nature Genetics, 1, 20–29.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knights, C. D., Catania, J., Di Giovanni, S., Muratoglu, S., et al. (2006). Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. Journal of Cell Biology, 173, 533–544.
Kohonen, T. (1984). Self-organization and associative memory. New York: Springer.
Levi-Montalcini, R. (1975). NGF: An uncharted route. In F. G. Worden (Ed.), The neurosciences – Paths of discoveries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levi-Montalcini, R. (1987). The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science, 237, 1154–1162.
Lotman, J. (1991). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Marquardt, T., & Pfaff, S. L. (2001). Cracking the transcriptional code for cell specification in the neural tube. Cell, 106, 651–654.
Maslon, L. (1972). Wolf children and the problem of human nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Morgan, L. C. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.
Nicolelis, M., & Ribeiro, S. (2006). Seeking the neural code. Scientific American, 295, 70–77.
Peirce, C. S. (1906). The basis of pragmaticism. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. I–VI). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1931–1935.
Perissi, V., & Rosenfeld, M. G. (2005). Controlling nuclear receptors: The circular logic of cofactor cycles. Nature Molecular Cell Biology, 6, 542–554.
Pertea, M., Mount, S. M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2007). A computational survey of candidate exonic splicing enhancer motifs in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 159.
Portmann, A. (1941). Die Tragzeiten der Primaten und die Dauer der Schwangerschaft beim Menschen: ein Problem der vergleichen Biologie. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 48, 511–518.
Portmann, A. (1945). Die Ontogenese des Menschen als Problem der Evolutionsforschung. Verhhandlungen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 125, 44–53.
Readies, C., & Takeichi, M. (1996). Cadherine in the developing central nervous system: An adhesive code for segmental and functional subdivisions. Developmental Biology, 180, 413–423.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioural Brain Science, 3, 417–457.
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1963). Communication among social bees; porpoises and sonar; man and dolphin. Language, 39, 448–466.
Sebeok, T. A. (1972). Perspectives in zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
Sebeok, T. A. (1988). I think I am a verb: More contributions to the doctrine of signs. New York: Plenum Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1991). A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation, and prospects. In: K. Kull (Ed.), Jakob von Uexküll: A paradigm for biology and semiotics. Semiotica, 134(1/4), 61–78.
Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Segal, E., Fondufe-Mittendorf, Y., Chen, L., Thastrom, A., Fiels, Y., Moore, I. K., Wang, J. P., & Widom, J. (2006). A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature, 442, 772–778.
Shapiro, L., & Colman, D. R. (1999). The diversity of cadherins and implications for a synaptic adhesive code in the CNS. Neuron, 23, 427–430.
Shattuck, R. (1981). The forbidden experiment: The story of the wild boy of Aveyron. New York: Washington Square Press.
Spemann, H. (1901). Entwicklungphysiologische Studien am Tritonei I. Wilhelm Roux’ Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik, 12, 224–264.
Sperry, R. W. (1943). Visuomotor coordination in the newt (Triturus viridescens) after regeneration of the optic nerve. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 79, 33–55.
Sperry, R. W. (1963). Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fibers patterns and connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 50, 703–710.
Strahl, B. D., & Allis, D. (2000). The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature, 403, 41–45.
Tomkins, M. G. (1975). The metabolic code. Science, 189, 760–763.
Trifonov, E. N. (1987). Translation framing code and frame-monitoring mechanism as suggested by the analysis of mRNA and 16s rRNA nucleotide sequence. Journal of Molecular Biology, 194, 643–652.
Trifonov, E. N. (1989). The multiple codes of nucleotide sequences. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 51, 417–432.
Trifonov, E. N. (1996). Interfering contexts of regulatory sequence elements. Cabios, 12, 423–429.
Trifonov, E. N. (1999). Elucidating sequence codes: Three codes for evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 870, 330–338.
Tudge, C. (2000). The variety of life. A survey and a celebration of all the creatures that have ever lived. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Turner, B. M. (2000). Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. BioEssay, 22, 836–845.
Turner, B. M. (2002). Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell, 111, 285–291.
Verhey, K. J., & Gaertig, J. (2007). The tubulin code. Cell Cycle, 6(17), 2152–2160.
von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Julius Springer.
Woese, C. R. (1987). Bacterial evolution. Microbiological Reviews, 51, 221–271.
Woese, C. R. (2000). Interpreting the universal phylogenetic tree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 97, 8392–8396.
Woese, C. R. (2002). On the evolution of cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 99, 8742–8747.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barbieri, M. (2013). Organic Codes and the Natural History of Mind. In: Swan, L. (eds) Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5418-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5419-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)