Skip to main content

Color and Spatial Features Integrated Normalized Distance for Density Based Border Detection in Dermoscopy Images

  • Chapter
  • 1487 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics ((LNCVB,volume 6))

Abstract

Dermoscopy is the major imaging modality used in the diagnosis of melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopy images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer inconsistencies at interpretation of the same image. Automated detection of lesion borders is very important step in dermoscopy image analysis. One of the highest accuracy rates in the automated lesion border detection field is achieved by Fast Density Based Lesion Detection (FDBLD), which is based on density based clustering of pixel-of-interest. In addition to low border detection error, FDBLD removes redundant computations in well-known spatial density based clustering algorithm DBSCAN; thus, in turn it accelerates clustering process considerably. However, FDBLD is designed to run only on binary images; thus, it requires pre-processing step to convert color image in to a binary image. Furthermore, very important color information in dermoscopy images falls into disuse.

In this study, we develop a modified FDBLD by introducing a new distance measure called Normalized Distance. Our method (ND- FDBLD) improves the efficiency of lesion detection by plugging Normalized Distance into FDBLD. This in turn removes dependency of FDBLD to preprocessing step and improves its accuracy. Moreover, developed distance measure helped involve both color and position dependencies in FDBLD. Both FDBLD and ND-FDBLD methods, in experiments, are tested on the same set of dermoscopy images. ND-FDBLD method is compared not only against FDBLD but also against dermatologists’ drawn ground truth lesion border images. Results revealed that new algorithm is more accurate and efficient than FDBLD on 75 % of 100 dermoscopy images. On 23 % of images both our method and FDBLD performed the same accuracy rates. FDBLD had better accuracy than ND-FDBLD only on two images. In parallel to these results, ND-FDBLD generates more accurate results than FDBLD compared to dermatologists’ drawn ground truth images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is also called the International Commission on Illumination.

References

  1. AmericanCancerSociety (2010) Cancer facts & figures. Available: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/acspc-024113.pdf

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rigel DS, Carucci JA (2000) Malignant melanoma: prevention, early detection, and treatment in the 21st century. CA Cancer J Clin 50:215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Binder M, Schwarz M, Winkler A, Steiner A, Kaider A, Wolff K, Pehamberger H (1995) Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. Arch Dermatol 131:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Celebi ME, Iyatomi H, Schaefer G, Stoecker WV (2009) Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 33:148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emre Celebi M, Alp Aslandogan Y, Stoecker WV, Iyatomi H, Oka H, Chen X (2007) Unsupervised border detection in dermoscopy images. Skin Res Technol 13:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pratt WK (2007) Digital image processing: PIKS scientific inside, 4th edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Celebi ME, Wen Q, Hwang S, Iyatomi H, Schaefer G (2012) Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images using ensembles of thresholding methods. Skin Res Technol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez DD, Butakoff C, Ersboll BK, Stoecker W (2008) Independent histogram pursuit for segmentation of skin lesions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Celebi ME, Kingravi HA, Iyatomi H, Aslandogan YA, Stoecker WV, Moss RH, Malters JM, Grichnik JM, Marghoob AA, Rabinovitz HS, Menzies SW (2008) Border detection in dermoscopy images using statistical region merging. Skin Res Technol 14:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (1999) Image processing, analysis, and machine vision, vol 2. PWS, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  12. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, Binder M, Cerroni L, De Rosa G, Ferrara G (2003) Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 48:679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T, Cognetta AB, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Bilek P, Braun-Falco O, Plewig G (1994) The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M (1998) Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 134:1563–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of KDD, pp 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mete M, Kockara S, Aydin K (2011) Fast density-based lesion detection in dermoscopy images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 35:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sertel O, Kong J, Shimada H, Catalyurek U, Saltz JH, Gurcan MN (2009) Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: classification of stromal development. Pattern Recognit 42:1093–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mete M, Hennings L, Spencer HJ, Topaloglu U (2009) Automatic identification of angiogenesis in double stained images of liver tissue. BMC Bioinform 10(Suppl 11):S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Andrew A (1979) Another efficient algorithm for convex hulls in two dimensions. Inf Process Lett 9:216–219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Cleland TM (2004) A practical description of the munsell color system and suggestions for its use 1937. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hunter RS (1948) Minutes of the thirty-first meeting of the board of directors of the optical society of America, incorporated. J Opt Soc Am 38:651

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hård A, Sivik L (1981) NCS—natural color system: a Swedish standard for color notation. Color Res Appl 6:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Umbaugh SE (2005) Computer imaging: digital image analysis and processing. CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Russ JC (2007) The image processing handbook. CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Mete M, Topaloglu U (2009) Statistical comparison of color model-classifier pairs in hematoxylin and eosin stained histological images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology, pp 284–291

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Celebi ME, Kingravi HA, Celiker F (2010) Fast colour space transformations using minimax approximations. IET Image Process 4:70–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Hance GA, Umbaugh SE, Moss RH, Stoecker WV (1996) Unsupervised color image segmentation: with application to skin tumor borders. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 15:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaefer G, Rajab MI, Emre Celebi M, Iyatomi H (2011) Colour and contrast enhancement for improved skin lesion segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 35:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mete M, Sirakov NM (2010) Lesion detection in demoscopy images with novel density-based and active contour approaches. BMC Bioinform 11:S23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is partially supported by University Research Council at University of Central Arkansas. Part of this research is funded by Graduate School of TAMU-Commerce.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Kockara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kockara, S., Mete, M., Suer, S. (2013). Color and Spatial Features Integrated Normalized Distance for Density Based Border Detection in Dermoscopy Images. In: Celebi, M., Schaefer, G. (eds) Color Medical Image Analysis. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5389-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5389-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5389-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics