Skip to main content

Eco-Cities Without Ecology: Constructing Ideologies, Valuing Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Future City ((FUCI,volume 3))

Abstract

In the last 5 years, prominent large-scale “eco-city” development proposals have emerged around the globe. The term has been increasingly applied to a number of different projects that embrace a broad array of ideological and ecological goals. We outline the ideologies embedded in contemporary eco-city development through a case-study approach, focusing on two high-profile eco-cities. The two eco-city proposals we examine include one located in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates called Masdar and another one in Shanghai, China known as Dongtan. We ask the question: are “eco-cities” really about “ecological cities”? We argue that this new iteration of eco-city development is based on an ideological world-view akin to green, state-sponsored capitalism, and ultimately, “eco-cities” are less about “ecological cities” than about enacting and supporting pro-capitalist ideologies, albeit with a green veneer. We argue that these eco-cities present a new process of the consumption of nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2006) What are ecosystem services: the need for standarized environmental accounting units. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Grove JM (2006) Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecol Complex 3:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampsie S (2008) City of dreams. Eng Technol 6:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DR, Freudenburg WR (2010) Ecological modernization and its critics: assessing the past and looking toward the future. Soc Nat Resour 14:701–709. doi:10.1080/08941920119315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandy M (2002) Concrete and clay: reworking nature in New York city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Baggethun E, de Groot RS, Lomasa PL, Montesa C (2010) The history of ecosystem ­services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider H (2010) Completion of Masdar City pushed back. Khaleej Times, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins H (1999) Natural capitalism: creating the next industrial revolution. Little Brown & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzerling L, Ackerman F (2002) Pricing the priceless: cost-benefit analysis of environmental protection. Georgetown Environmental Law and Policy Institute/Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen N, Robbins P (2005) The neoliberalization of nature: governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Capital Nat Social 16:5–8. doi:8.10.1080/1045575052000335339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igoe J, Brockington D (2007) Neoliberal conservation: a brieft introduction. Conserv Soc 5:432–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N (2011) Proposing policy by analogy is bad policy. Nature 469:302. doi:10.1038/469266a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaika M (2005) City of flows: modernity, nature, and the city. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier J (2007) The distributional effects of environmental policy. Ecol Econ 63:246–247. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGray D (2007) China’s great leap forward. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.05/feat_popup_sb.html. Accessed 24 Oct 2011

  • Mol APJ, Spaargaren G (2000) Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review. In: Mol APJ, Sonnenfeld DA (eds) Ecological modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates. Frank Cass, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Normile D (2008) China’s living laboratory in urbanization. Science 8:740–743. doi:10.1126/science.319.5864.740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouroussoff N (2010) In Arabian desert, a sustainable city rises. The New York Times. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola S (2008) How useful is ecosystem valuation? In: Economics and conservation in the tropics: a strategic dialogue, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P (2007) Lawn people: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M (2000) Environmental economics and the conflation of value and benefit. Environ Sci Tech 34:1426–1432. doi:10.1021/es990674d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff M (2011) The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 70:497–502. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Kallis G, Martinez-Alier J (2010) Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. J Clean Prod 18:511–518. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren G, Mol APJ (1992) Sociology, environment, and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Soc Nat Resour 5:323–344. doi:10.1080/08941929209380797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH, Sattele J (2010) Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7:327–337. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H, Moffatt S, Iizuka R (2010) Eco2 Cities: ecological cities as economic cities. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sze J, Zhou Y (2011) Imagining a Chinese eco-city. In: LeMenager S et al (eds) Environmental criticism for the 21st century. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46:493–510. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa E (2003) Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organ Environ 16:273–288. doi:10.1177/108602660325629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young SC (2000) The origins and evolving nature of ecological modernisation. In: Young S (ed) The emergence of ecological modernisation. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Sze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sze, J., Gambirazzio, G. (2013). Eco-Cities Without Ecology: Constructing Ideologies, Valuing Nature. In: Pickett, S., Cadenasso, M., McGrath, B. (eds) Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design. Future City, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics