Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Landscapes Through Spatial Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Forest Landscape Restoration

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter outlines how landscape simulation models can be used to support forest landscape restoration. In the first type of application, landscape models of disturbance and forest succession were used to estimate historical variability in landscape composition and configuration. An example is given based on a study in the Oregon Coast Range of USA which showed the present day forest patterns are outside the range of historical variability. Problems with this approach lie in deciding the landscape metrics to use and, in this particular case, in assembling reliable data on historical fire regimes. A second common application of landscape simulation models is to project future landscapes under alternative landscape restoration scenarios. These types of simulation experiments with landscape models focus less on making predictions of historical or future landscape conditions but, rather, place more emphasis on exploring general hypotheses about pattern-process relationships. One important insight is that changes in landscape composition and configuration often lag behind shifts in disturbance regimes, and that temporal as well as spatial landscape heterogeneity is important to consider when assessing ecological responses to changing disturbance regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL (1989) A review of models of landscape change. Landsc Ecol 2:111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL (1992) Effects of settlement and fire suppression on landscape structure. Ecology 73:1879–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL (1993) Spatially heterogeneous multiscale response of landscapes to fire suppression. Oikos 66:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WI (1994) Restoration of landscape structure altered by fire suppression. Conserv Biol 8:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL (1995) Longterm response of disturbance landscape to human intervention and global change. Landsc Ecol 10:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL, Egbert SL, Frazier GF (1991) A spatial model for studying the effects of climatic change on the structure of landscapes subject to large disturbances. Ecol Model 56:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart J (1995) Acceptance criteria for using individual-based models to make management decisions. Ecol Appl 5:411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger P, Lennette M, Johnson KN, Spies TA (2005) A hierarchical spatial framework for forest landscape planning. Ecol Model 182:25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu R, He HS, Hu YM, Chang Y, Larsen DR (2008) Using the LANDIS model to evaluate forest harvesting and planting strategies under possible warming climates in Northeastern China. For Ecol Manag 254:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns DM, Lafon CW, Waldron JD, Tchakerian M, Coulson RN, Klepzig KD, Birt AG, Xi W (2008) Simulating the reciprocal interaction of forest landscape structure and southern pine beetle herbivory using LANDIS. Landsc Ecol 23:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1988) Theory and models in ecology: a different perspective. Ecol Model 43:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1991) Simulation methods for developing general landscape-level hypotheses of single-species dynamics. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, pp 417–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) (1993) Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, and the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Shvidenko AZ, Sturtevant BR, Scheller RM (2010) Predicting climate change effects on forest biomass and composition in south-central Siberia. Ecol Appl 20:700–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He HS (2008) Forest landscape models: definitions, characterization, and classification. For Ecol Manag 254:484–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessburg PF, Agee JK, Franklin JF (2005) Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modem eras. For Ecol Manag 211:117–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter ML (1993) Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biol Conserv 65:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impara PC (1997) Spatial and temporal patterns of fire in the forests of the Central Oregon Coast Range. Oregon State University, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KN, Bettinger P, Kline JD, Spies TA, Lennette M, Lettman G, Garber-Yonts B, Larsen T (2007) Simulating forest structure, timber production, and socioeconomic effects in a multi-owner province. Ecol Appl 17:34–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karau EC, Keane RE (2007) Determining landscape extent for succession and disturbance simulation modeling. Landsc Ecol 22:993–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Parsons RA, Hessburg PF (2002) Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach. Ecol Model 151:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Cary GJ, Davies ID, Flannigan MD, Gardner RH, Lavorel S, Lenihan JM, Li C, Rupp TS (2004) A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics. Ecol Model 179:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Holsinger LM, Pratt SD (2006) Simulating historical landscape dynamics using the landscape fire succession model LANDSUM version 4.0. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-171CD, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane RE, Rollins M, Zhu ZL (2007) Using simulated historical time series to prioritize fuel treatments on landscapes across the United States: the LANDFIRE prototype project. Ecol Model 204:485–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landres PB, Morgan P, Swanson FJ (1999) Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 9:1179–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng WF, He HS, Bu RC, Dai LM, Hu YM, Wang XG (2008) Predicting the distributions of suitable habitat for three larch species under climate warming in Northeastern China. For Ecol Manag 254:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long CJ, Whitlock C (2002) Fire and vegetation history from the coastal rain forest of the western Oregon coast range. Quat Res 58:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long CJ, Whitlock C, Bartlien PJ, Millspaugh SH (1998) A 9,000-year fire history from the Oregon Coast Range, based on a high-resolution charcoal study. Can J For Res 28:774–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComb BC, Spies TA, Olsen KA (2007) Sustaining biodiversity in the Oregon Coast Range: potential effects of forest policies in a multi-ownership province. Ecol Soc 12(2):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 19:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka E, Spies TA (2005) Historical range of variability in landscape structure: a simulation study in Oregon, USA. Ecol Appl 15:1727–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka E, Spies TA, Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2007) History range of variability (HRV) in live and dead wood biomass: a regional-scale simulation study. Can J For Res 37:2349–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck SL (2004) Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends Ecol Evol 19:530–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG, Crow TR (2004) Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: a synthesis. In: Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG (eds) Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry GLW, Enright NJ (2002) Humans, fire and landscape pattern: understanding a maquis-forest complex, Mont Do, New Caledonia, using a spatial ‘state-and-transition’ model. J Biogeogr 29:1143–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry GLW, Enright NJ (2006) Spatial modelling of vegetation change in dynamic landscapes: a review of methods and applications. Prog Phys Geogr 30:47–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry GLW, Millington JDA (2008) Spatial modelling of succession-disturbance dynamics in forest ecosystems: concepts and examples. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Carpenter SR (2003) Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conserv Biol 17:358–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins MGC, Frame K (2006) The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-175, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Rykiel EJ (1996) Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol Model 90:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2005) A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA. Glob Chang Biol 11:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2007) An ecological classification of forest landscape simulation models: tools and strategies for understanding broad-scale forested ecosystems. Landsc Ecol 22:491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Hardy CC, Hann WJ, Bunnell DJ (2002) Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. General Technical Report RMRS-87, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher S, Bugmann H (2006) The relative importance of climatic effects, wildfires and management for future forest landscape dynamics in the Swiss Alps. Glob Chang Biol 12:1435–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifley SR, Thompson FR, Dijak WD, Larson MA, Millspaugh JJ (2006) Simulated effects of forest management alternatives on landscape structure and habitat suitability in the Midwestern United States. For Ecol Manag 229:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restroation. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Johnson KN, Burnett KM, Ohmann JL, McComb BC, Reeves GH, Bettinger P, Kline JD, Garber-Yonts B (2007a) Cumulative ecological and socioeconomic effects of forest policies in Coastal Oregon. Ecol Appl 17:5–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, McComb BC, Kennedy RSH, McGrath MT, Olsen K, Pabst RJ (2007b) Potential effects of forest policies on terrestrial biodiversity in a multi-ownership province. Ecol Appl 17:48–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steele BM, Reddy SK, Keane RE (2006) A methodology for assessing departure of current plant communities from historical conditions over large landscapes. Ecol Model 199:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Miranda BR, Yang J, He HS, Gustafson EJ, Scheller RM (2009) Studying fire mitigation strategies in multi-ownership landscapes: calancing the management of fire-dependent ecosystems and fire risk. Ecosystems 12:445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teensma PD, Rienstra JT Yeiter MA (1991) Preliminary reconstruction and analysis of change in forest stand age class of the Oregon Coast Range from 1850 to 1940. T/N OR-9, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Johnson KN, Lennette M, Spies TA, Bettinger P (2006) Historical disturbance regimes as a reference for forest policy in a multiowner province: a simulation experiment. Can J For Res 36:401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, O’Neill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology: a hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. Bioscience 37:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg PJ, Swanson FJ (2003) Regional synchroneity in fire regimes of western Oregon and Washington, USA. For Ecol Manag 172:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC (2002) Spatial simulation of historical landscape patterns in coastal forests of the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res 32:1316–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC (2004) Fire and forest landscapes in the Georgia Piedmont: an assessment of spatial modeling assumptions. Ecol Model 180:41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC (2006) Species dynamics in disturbed landscapes: when does a shifting habitat mosaic enhance connectivity? Landsc Ecol 21:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Kennedy RSH (2008) Spatially explicit modeling of mixed-severity fire regimes and landscape dynamics. For Ecol Manag 254:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2004) A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) Coast Range. Landsc Ecol 19:631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Spies TA, Long CJ, Whitlock C (2000) Simulating historical variability in the amount of old forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Conserv Biol 14:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Spies TA, Nonaka E (2004) Using criteria based on the natural fire regime to evaluate forest management in the Oregon Coast Range of the United States. In: Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG (eds) Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 146–157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geographic Information Science Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University Brookings, Brookings, SD, 57006, USA

    Michael C. Wimberly & Stephen P. Boyte

  2. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Institute for Applied Ecosystem Studies, Rhinelander, WI, 54501, USA

    Eric J. Gustafson

Authors
  1. Michael C. Wimberly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen P. Boyte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric J. Gustafson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Wimberly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Ctr. Forest Disturbance Science, US Forest Service, Green St. 320, Athens, 30602, Georgia, USA

    John Stanturf

  2. Center for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Queensland University, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia

    David Lamb

  3. , Danish Ctr Forest, Landscape Planning, University of Copenhagen, Vedelsgade 6, Vejle, 7100, Denmark

    Palle Madsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wimberly, M.C., Boyte, S.P., Gustafson, E.J. (2012). Understanding Landscapes Through Spatial Modeling. In: Stanturf, J., Lamb, D., Madsen, P. (eds) Forest Landscape Restoration. World Forests, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation