Abstract
Complementarity is an epistemological principle derived from the subject-object or observer-system dichotomy, where each side requires a separate mode of description that is formally incompatible with and irreducible to the other, and where one mode of description alone does not provide comprehensive explanatory power. The classical physics paradigm, on which biological, social and psychological sciences are modeled, completely suppresses the observer or subject side of this dichotomy in order to claim unity and consistency in theory and objectivity in experimental observations. Quantum mechanical measurements have shown this paradigm to be untenable. Explanation of events requires both an objective, causal representation and a subjective, prescriptive representation that are complementary. The concepts of description and function in biological systems, and goals and policies in social systems, are found to have the same epistemological basis as the concept of measurement in physics. The concepts of rate-dependent and rate-independent processes are proposed as a necessary distinction for applying the principle of complementarity to explanations of physical, biological and social systems.
Reprinted from J. Social Biol. Structures, 1:191–200, 1978.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bohm, D. (1971). On Bohr’s views concerning the quantum theory. In T. Bastin (Ed.), Quantum theory and beyond (pp. 33–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohr, N. (1928). The 1927 Como lecture reprinted in Nature 121, 580.
Bohr, N. (1937). Biology and atomic physics. In Atomic physics and human knowledge (pp. 13–22). New York: John Wiley.
Bohr, N. (1938). Natural philosophy and human cultures. In Atomic physics and human knowledge (pp. 23–31). New York: John Wiley.
Bohr, N. (1949). In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist (pp. 201–241). Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.
Ghiselin, B. (1955). The creative process. New York: New American Library (Mentor).
Haldane, J.B.S. (1963). Discussion at conference on the origin of prebiological systems, Wakulla Springs, FL, October 1963.
Jammer, M. (1974). The philosophy of quantum mechanics. New York: John Wiley.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: New American Library (Signet).
Mesarovic, M., & Pestel, E. (1974). Mankind at the turning point. New York: New American Library (Signet).
Monod, J. (1971). Chance and necessity (p. 21). New York: Alfred Knopf.
Pattee, H. H. (1972). Laws, constraints, symbols, and languages. In C. Waddington (Ed.), Towards a theoretical biology (Vol. 4, pp. 248–258). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pattee, H. H. (1976). The role of instabilities in the evolution of control hierarchies. In T. Burns & W. Buckley (Eds.), Power and control—Social structures and their transformations (pp. 171–184). London: Sage Publications.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Thom, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. Reading: W. A. Benjamin.
von Weizsäcker, C. F. (1949). Zur Deutung der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 118, 489.
Zeeman, E. C. (1976). Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 234, 65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pattee, H.H. (2012). The Complementarity Principle in Biological and Social Structures. In: LAWS, LANGUAGE and LIFE. Biosemiotics, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5161-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5161-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5160-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5161-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)