Skip to main content

Adaptive Management, Adaptive Planning, Review and Audit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1953 Accesses

Abstract

Planning should be a continuous, iterative and developmental process. Adaptive management can be applied to any site, regardless of size. It is, in its more complex form, an approach to experimental management that enables changes to be linked to cause and to management operations. This chapter considers the main versions of adaptive management and introduces a minimal version: a basic approach, but with some significant differences. It is not experimentation but a simpler system based on monitoring and then, if necessary, modifying management. The cyclical, adaptable management process allows site management to: respond to natural dynamic processes; accommodate the legitimate interests of others; adapt to the ever-changing political and socio-economic climate; and, in the long term, succeed, despite uncertain and variable resources. There is a continuum, from trial and error to full scale active adaptive management, and somewhere within this range there lies a version of adaptive which is appropriate for any given place and time. Management reviews are an integral and essential component of the adaptive management process. Audit is not strictly a component of the management planning process but a complementary activity that sits alongside management planning. Audit is the procedure for assessing whether a site is being managed to the standard required by an organisation and ensuring that the status of the site features is accurately reported.

Adaptive management is not really much more than common sense. But common sense is not always in common use. (Holling 1978)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important that managing ecological systems in this context is not confused with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) ‘ecosystem approach’. See Chapter 7 which deals with the CBD approach in some detail.

  2. 2.

    Maritime dry heath is generally dominated by dwarf shrubs: varying proportions of heather, bell heather and, in some areas, western gorse Ulex gallii.

  3. 3.

    The most fundamental problem in conservation management is how to obtain and maintain the condition defined by the objectives.

  4. 4.

    The difference between status and condition, and the full implications of status, are described in Chapter 14.

References

  • Alexander, M. (1994). Management Planning Handbook. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2000a). A Management Planning Handbook. Uganda Wildlife Authority, Kampala Uganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2000b). Guide to the Production of Management Plans for Protected Areas. CMS Partnership, Aberystwyth, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2005). The CMS Guide to Management Planning. The CMS Consortium, Talgarth, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, C. and Stankey, G.H. (eds.), (2009). Adaptive Environment Management. Springer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W., Willoughby, J. W. and Gibbs, J. P. (2001). Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations: A Handbook for Field Biologists. Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosite (1999). Toolkit for Management Planning. Eurosite, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. L. (1999). The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmorek, D. R., Robinson, D. C. E., Murray, C. and Grieg, L. (2006). Enabling Adaptive Forest Management. National Commission on Sustainable Forestry, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministere charge de l’Environmement (1991). Plans de gestion des reserves Naturelles. Direction de la Protection de la Nature, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1983). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1988). Site Management Plans for Nature Conservation, A Working Guide. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1991). Site Management Plans for Nature Conservation, A Working Guide (Revised). Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D. M. and Hellawell, T. C. (2001). Management plan for Hafod Garegog National Nature Reserve. Unpublished document, Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Bureau (2002). New Guidelines for Management Planning for Ramsar Sites and Other Wetlands, Ramsar resolution VIII.14. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., Roger, N., Clark and Bormann, B. T. (2005). Adaptive Management of Natural Resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. and Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing. Ecology, 71, 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. L., Dehaan, R. L., Watts, R. J., Page, K. J., Bowmer, K. H. and Curtis, A. (2007). Proceedings of the 5th Australian Stream Management Conference. Australian Rivers: Making a Difference. Charles Sturt University, Thurgoona, New South Wales Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. B. and Warren, A. (ed.), (1976). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans – Conservation Course Format, Revision 1. University College London, Discussion Papers in Conservation, No. 18, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. B. and Warren, A. (ed.), (1978). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans – Conservation Course Format, Revision 2. University College London, Discussion Papers in Conservation, No. 18, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Alexander .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexander, M. (2013). Adaptive Management, Adaptive Planning, Review and Audit. In: Management Planning for Nature Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5116-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics