Skip to main content

From Practical Science to a Practice Based Approach: A Short History of Forest Policy Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2000 Accesses

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 14))

Abstract

This chapter presents a short history of forest policy studies, with the aim of situating the practice based approach of this book. Forest policy studies emerged as a sub-discipline within forestry science in the mid-20th century. Its early focus was strongly influenced by traditional forestry science, but since then it has evolved. The chapter first explores the basic characteristics of forestry science that prevailed when forest policy analysis emerged, and identifies the disciplinary matrix underlying conventional forestry science. The next sections describe how forest policy studies’ normative view on professional practice changed into an analytical perspective on governance processes, and how a critical perspective on policy practices has recently been added to the discipline’s repertoire. During this process, the conceptualisation of the ‘forestry practitioner’ gradually widened from professional foresters to include both forest policy makers and laymen practitioners. Concomitantly, the role of the forest policy scientists has gradually changed, from (1) advising foresters, to (2) explaining policy dynamics, to (3) reflecting upon the social practices of scientists, policy makers and professional foresters alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to the authors’ predominant research focus on European and tropical forestry, in this chapter only a few references are made to forest policy studies in the Americas.

References

  • Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 329(5882):1460–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose-Oji B (2010). Environmental sociology and international forestry: historic overview and future directions. In: Redclift MR, Woodgate G (eds) The international handbook of environmental sociology, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK & Northampton USA, pp 311–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JEM (2001) Forests and people: 25 years of community forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts B (2006) Forests, institutions, discourses. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest politics. Inaugural address, Wageningen University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts B (2012) Forests policy analysis and theory use: overview and trends. For Policy Econ 16:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts B, Buizer M (2009) Forests, discourse, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. For Policy Econ 11:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banjade MR, Schanz H, Leeuwis C (2006) Discourses of information in community forest user groups in Nepal. Int Forestry Rev 8(2):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behan RW (1966) The myth of the omnipotent forester. J Forest 64(6):398–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengston DN (1994) Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 7:515–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon TE (1999) Five analytical frameworks for analysing public participation. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Regional forest programmes: a participatory approach to support forest based regional development. EFI Proceedings No. 32, Joensuu, Finland, pp 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijs A (2009) Public nature. Social representations of nature and local practices. Doctoral thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro AP, Nielson E (2003) Natural resource conflict management case studies: an analysis of power, participation and protected areas. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnley S, Poe MR (2007) Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annu Rev Anthropol 36:301–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JM, Uphoff NT (1980) Participation’s place in rural development: seeking clarity through specificity. World Dev 8(3):213–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchester M (2008) Beyond tenure: rights-based approaches to peoples and forests. Some lessons from the forests peoples programme. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Coufal JE (1989) Forestry: in evolution or revolution? The current paradox of forestry. J Forest 87(5):27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty M (1998) The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargavel J, Hobley M, Kengen S (1985) Forestry for development and underdevelopment of forestry. In: Dargavel J, Simpson G (eds) Forestry, success or failure in developing countries. Australian National University, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, CRES Working Paper 1985/20, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands BHM, Wiersum KF (2001) Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses. For Policy Econ 3:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfax SK, Fortmann L (1990) American forestry professionalism in the third world: some preliminary observations. Popul Environ 11(4):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Robertson FC (ed) (1971) Terminology of forest science, technology practice and products. Society of American Foresters, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Leeuwis C, Andersson JA et al (2008) Competing claims on natural resources: What role for science? Ecol Soc 13(2), article 34. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art34/

  • Gilmour DA, King GC (1989) Management of forest for local use in the hills of Nepal. I Changing forest management paradigms. J World For Resour Manage 4:93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Glacken CJ (1967) Traces on the Rhodian shore. Nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P (1987) Social values in forestry. Ambio 16(2/3):158–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P (1992) Evolution of forest policy studies in Austria. In: Paper IUFRO 1992 Centennial meeting, subject group Forest Policy and Administration, Berlin, 31 Aug–4 Sept 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JC (1994) The new face of forestry: exploring a discontinuity and the need for a vision. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, William P. Thompson Memorial Lecture No. 18, Flagstaff, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen H, Draper S, Elz D (eds) (1989) People and trees: the role of social forestry in sustainable development. World Bank, EDI Seminar Series, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogstra MA (2008) Coping with the long term. An empirical analysis of time perspectives, time orientations, and temporal uncertainty in forestry. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel FC (ed) (1984) Forest policy. A contribution to resource development, vol 12. Forestry science Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys D (1996) Forest politics. The evolution of international cooperation. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1980) World conservation strategy living resource conservation for sustainable development. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural resources, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JJ, Dombeck MP, Koch NE (1998) Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the western world at the close of the twentieth century. Unasylva 49(149):16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentish B, Fawns R (1995) The changing professional identity of foresters. Aust Forestry 58(3):110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch NE, Kennedy JJ (1991) Multiple-use forestry for social values. Ambio 20(7):330–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Krott M (2005) Forest policy analysis. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions., 2nd enlarged edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A (ed) (2000) Forestry, forest users and research: new ways of learning. European Tropical Forest Research Network (ETFRN), Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Long N, van der Ploeg JD (1989) Demythologizing planned interventions: an actor perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 29(3/4):226–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel K (1964) History of international science of forestry with special consideration of central Europe: literature, training and research from the earliest beginnings to the nineteenth century. Int Rev For Res 1:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustalahti I, Lund J (2010) Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? Learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos. Soc Nat Resour 23:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peluso NL (1992) Rich forests, poor people. Resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre J, Peters G (2000) Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert MP, Pretty JN (1997) Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. In: Ghimire KB, Pimbert MP (eds) Social change and conservation. Earthscan, London, pp 297–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore D (1995) Forestry and nature conservation: changing perspectives. Commonwealth For Rev 74(1):5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) (2010) Embracing complexity: meeting challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report, vol 28. IUFRO World Series, International Union of Forest Research Organisation, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz A (2002) Towards a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche L (1992) The profession of forestry now and in the year 2000. Commonwealth For Rev 71:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen MAF, van Andel T, Morsello C, Otsuki K, Rosendo S, Scholz I (2008) Forest-related partnerships in Brazilian Amazonia: there is more to sustainable forest management than reduced impact logging. For Ecol Manage 256:1482–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanz H (1999) What is a forest? What is forestry? Science on the boundaries. Inaugural address. Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanz H (2002) National forest programmes as discursive institutions. For Policy Econ 4(4):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1959) Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. Am Econo Rev 49:253–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout E, Hisschemöller M, Eijsackers H (2008) Science in Wadden sea policy: from accommodation to advocacy. Environ Sci Policy 11:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout E, van Bommel S, Aarts N (2010) How participation creates citizens: participatory governance as performative practice. Ecol Soc 15(4), article 26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art26/

  • Umans L (1993) A discourse on forestry science. Agric Hum Values 10(4):26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bommel S(2008) Understanding experts and expertise in different governance contexts: the case of nature conservation in the Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hengel E (1991) Milieukunde: nieuw paradigma of meer van hetzelfde? In: Gremmen B, Lijmbach S (eds) Toegepaste filosofie in praktijk, vol 32. Wageningse Sociologische Studies, Wageningen, pp 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maaren A (1984). Forests and forestry in national life. In: Hummel FC (ed) Forest policy: a contribution to resource development. Martinus Nijhoff/DR. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • van Maaren A (1993) Bomen over bossen en mensen in’t verschiet. Farewell address. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet C (1993) Bosbeleidskunde in ontwikkeling: een systematische benadering. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 64(3):136–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest P, Peluso NL (2006a) Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast Asia, part 1. Environ Hist 12(1):31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest P, Peluso NL (2006b) Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast Asia, part 2. Environ Hist 12(4):359–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman S, Liefferink S, Arts BJM (2009) A short history of Dutch forest policy: the ‘de-institutionalisation’ of a policy arrangement. For Policy Econ 11(3):202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbij E (2008) Inter-sectoral coordination in forest policy. A frame analysis of forest sectorization processes in Austria and the Netherlands. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Glasbergen P (2007) Partnerships in forest governance. Global Environ Change 17(3/4):408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar H (2011) Meaning in action. Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. M. E. Sharp Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby JC (1989) Introduction to world forestry. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (1984) Strategies and designs for afforestation, reforestation and tree planting. Proceedings of an international symposium. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (1995) 200 years of sustainability in forestry: lessons from history. Environ Manage 19(3):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (1997) Indigenous exploitation and management of tropical forest resources: an evolutionary continuum in forest-people interactions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 63:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (1999) Social forestry: changing perspectives in forestry science or practice? Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (2000) Forest policy development between globalisation and localisation. In: Krishnapillay B et al (eds) Forest and society: the role of research. In: Proceedings XXI IUFRO world congress 2000, vol 1, Sub-plenary session, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 589–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell AC (1970) Principles of forest policy. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmi Y (2007) Institutionalization of conflict capability in the management of natural resources. Theoretical perspectives and empirical experience in Indonesia. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerner C (2000) People, plants and justice: the politics of nature conservation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivnuska JA (1963) Forestry: a profession or a field of work? J Forest 61:339–340

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Freerk Wiersum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiersum, K.F., Arts, B., van Laar, J. (2012). From Practical Science to a Practice Based Approach: A Short History of Forest Policy Studies. In: Arts, B., Behagel, J., van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., Turnhout, E. (eds) Forest and Nature Governance. World Forests, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics