Abstract
One of the central claims or aspirations of modern psychology is to place the study of the human mind and behaviour on a properly scientific basis. This chapter proposes that while such scientific study of human beings might reveal all sorts of interesting things about them, ‘the proper study of mankind’ requires a different intellectual and imaginative apparatus rooted in the humanities and the more humanistic end of the social sciences.
The chapter pursues this argument via William James (often regarded as one of the founding figures of modern psychology and especially educational psychology) and via Isaiah Berlin to the early eighteenth-century philosopher. Giambattista Vico whose reaction to Enlightenment science and mathematics led him to articulate a vision of a scienza nuova,or new science, essentially rooted in the humanities. Berlin’s and Vico’s works are joined in this chapter to Winch’s advocacy of the centrality of philosophy to an understanding of human and social being. The result is to put a new emphasis on human self-consciousness and intentionality, on imagination or fantasia, on moral responsibility and self-questioning, on human experiencing of the natural and social world and on human understanding of the rules which they live by—as well as the cultural and historical framing of all these. In so far as these things are what constitute our humanity and in so far as these provide the very stuff of the subjects we roughly group together as the humanities, then this provides a case for valuing the contribution of the humanities to ‘the proper study of mankind’ above the scientific pretensions of psychology.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berlin, I. (1976). Vico and Herder: Two studies in the history of ideas. London: Hogarth Press.
Berlin, I. (1997). The proper study of mankind: An anthology of essays(Edited by H. Hardy & R. Hausheer with a foreword by R. Annan and an introduction by R, Hausheer). London: Chatto and Windus.
Bridges, D., Smeyers, P., & Smith, R. D. (Eds.). (2009). Evidence based policy: What evidence? What basis? Whose policy?Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goss, R. (1996). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour(3rd ed.). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Griaule, M. (1965). Conversations with Ogotemmêli: An introduction to Dogon religious ideas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Grimstobe, J. (2010, September 28). Tuition fees will rise to £10,000. The Sunday Times,p. 1.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
James, W. (1899/1985). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life’s ideals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, H. (1902/1974). The wings of a dove. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Kant, I. (1824). Idea of a universal history on a cosmo-political plan (English translation of original 1784 article). The London Magazine, 10, 385–393.
Morris, D. (1969). The naked ape. London: Corgi.
Pope, A. (1870). An essay on man. In H. F. Carey (Ed.), Practical works(pp. 1856–1857). London: Routledge.
Ryle, G. (1976). The concept of mind. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. R. (1994). Research methods in psychology(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Stake, R. (1977). Responsive evaluation. In D. Hamilton, D. Jenkins, C. King, B. Macdonald, & M. Parlett (Eds.), Beyond the numbers game. London: Macmillan.
Verene, D. P. (1981). Vico’s science of imagination. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vico, G. B. (1707/1993). On humanistic education: Six inaugural orations 1699–1707(Translated by G. A. Piriton & A. W. Shipper with Introduction by D. P. Verene). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Vico, G. B. (1709/1965). On the study methods of our time[De nostril temporis studiorum ratione] (Translated and introduced by E. Gianturco). New York: Bobbs-Merril.
Vico, G. B. (1725/2002). Vico: The first new science[Scienza Nuova] (L. Pompa, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vico, G.B . (1728/1963). Autobiography[Vito di Giambattista Vicoscritta da se medissimo] (M. H. Fisch & T. G. Bergin, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weber, M. (1922/1956). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Winch, P. (1964). Understanding a primitive society. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(4), 307–324.
Wundt, W. M. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: W. Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridges, D. (2013). ‘The Proper Study of Mankind’? In Defence of the Humanities Against the Exaggerated Pretensions of ‘Scientific’ Psychology. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology. Educational Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5037-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5038-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)