Abstract
A key strategy for sustainable water resource management in cities is enhancing water use efficiencies in the residential sector, which accounts for a significant portion of overall demand. Through a novel approach integrating metered water use with social survey data in a Geographic Information System, we examine how residents’ perceptions about water consumption correspond to actual residential demand in Phoenix, Arizona neighborhoods. By integrating disparate research approaches, we develop a typology characterizing the socio-spatial relationship between water use, perceptions, and additional determinants of neighborhood water demand. Our findings reveal areas where perceptions do and do not correspond with actual water use rates, thereby informing conservation efforts. Of critical importance to water managers, we pinpoint areas where reducing high consumption rates are confounded by residents’ perceptions of low usage rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adger WN, Brown K, Fairbras J, Jordan A, Paavola J, Roendo S, Eyfang G (2003) Governance for sustainability: toward a thick analysis of environmental decision-making. Environ Plan A 35:1095–1110
Aitken C, Duncan H, McMahon T (1991) A cross-sectional regression analysis of residential water demand in Melbourne. Aust Appl Geogr 11:157–165
Balling R, Gober P (2007) Climate variability and residential water use in the city of Phoenix, Arizona. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1130–1137
Baumann DD, Boland JJ, Hanemann WM (1998) Urban water demand management and planning. McGraw-Hill, New York
Campbell HE (2004) Prices, devices, people, or rules: the relative effectiveness of policy instruments in water conservation. Rev Policy Res 21:637–662
Campbell DT, Fiske D (1959) Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105
Campbell HE, Larson EH, Johnson RM, Waits MJ (1999) Some best bets in residential water conservation: results of a multivariate regression analysis, city of Phoenix, 1990–1996. Morrison Institute Report, Phoenix
City of Phoenix (2005) Water resources plan: 2005 update highlights. http://phoenix.gov/WATER/wtrpln05.html. Last accessed 15 Aug 2009
Corral-Verdugo V, Pinheiro JQ (2006) Sustainability, future orientation and water conservation. J Environ Psychol 56:191–198
Corral-Verdugo V, Bechtel R, Fraijo-Singc B (2003) Environmental beliefs and water conservation: an empirical study. J Environ Psychol 23:247–257
Dandy G, Nguyen T, Davies C (1997) Estimating residential water demand in the presence of free allowances. Land Econ 73(1):125
De Oliver M (1999) Attitudes and inaction: a case study of the manifest demographics of urban water conservation. Environ Behav 31:372
Domene E, Saurà D (2006) Urbanisation and water consumption: influencing actors in the metropolitan region of Barcelona. Urban Stud 43(9):1605–1623
Dunlap RE, Jones RE (2002) Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In: Dunlap RE, Michelson W (eds) Handbook of environmental sociology. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp 482–524
Ellis AW, Hawkins TW, Balling RC Jr, Gober P (2008) Estimating future runoff levels for a semi-arid fluvial system in Central Arizona. Climate Res 35:227–239
Guhathakurta G, Gober P (2007) The impact of the Phoenix urban heat island on residential water use. J Am Plann Assoc 73(3):317
Gutzler D, Nims J (2005) Interannual variability of water demand and summer climate in Albuquerque, New Mexico. J Appl Meteorol 44:1777
Harlan S, Budruck M, Gustafson A, Larson K, Ruddell D, Smith VK, Yabiku S, Wutich A (2007) 2006 highlights: Phoenix area social survey: community and environment in a desert metropolis. Global Institute of Sustainability, Tempe
Harlan S, Yabiku ST, Larsen L, Brazel AJ (2009) Household water consumption in an arid city: affluence, affordance, and attitudes. Soc Nat Res 22(8):691–709
Johnson R, Onwuegbuzie A (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33:14
Johnson R, Onwuegbuzie A, Turner L (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Method Res 1:112
Keys E, Wentz EA, Redman C (2007) The spatial structure of land use from 1970–2000 in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. Prof Geogr 59(1):131–147
Kirby A (2003) Why world’s taps are running dry, British Broadcasting Corporation. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2943946.stm. Last accessed 16 Nov 2008
Kurz T (2002) The psychology of environmentally sustainable behavior: fitting together pieces of the puzzle. Anal Soc Issu Public Policy 2:257–278
Larson KL, Casagrande D, Harlan S, Yabiku S (2009a) Residents’ yard choices and rationales in a desert city: social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs. Environ Manage 44:921–937
Larson K, Gustafson A, Hirt P (2009b) Insatiable thirst and a finite supply: an assessment of municipal water conservation policy in greater Phoenix, Arizona, 1980–2007. J Policy Hist 21(2):107–137
Larson KL, Ibes D, White D (2011) Gendered perspectives on water risks and policy strategies: a tripartite conceptual approach. Environment and Behavior 43(3):415–438
Loh M, Coghlan P (2003) Domestic water use study: Perth, Western Australia 1998–2001. Water Corporations, Perth
Martin C (2001) Landscape water use in Phoenix Arizona. Desert Plants 17:26–31
Monroe R (2008) Welcome to the new normal. Scripps Institution of Oceanography. http://explorations.ucsd.edu/Features/2008/New_Normal. Last accessed 25 Nov 2008
Renwick M, Archibald S (1998) Demand side management policies for residential water use: who bears the conservation burden? Land Econ 74:343–359
Ruddell D (2009) Chapter four: a mixed method multi-scale analysis: a case study on extreme heat in Phoenix, AZ. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Schneider A, Ingram H (1990) Behavioral assumption of policy tools. J Politics 52(2):510–529
Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18(5):429–434
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285
Stefanov WL, Ramsey MS, Christensen PR (2001) Monitoring urban land cover change: an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sens Environ 77:173–185
Stern P (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issue 56(3):407–424
Syme G, Shao Q, Po M, Campbell E (2004) Predicting and understanding home garden water use. Landsc Urban Plann 68(1):121–128
Trumbo CW, O’Keefe GJ (2001) Intention to conserve water: environmental values, planned behavior, and information effects. A comparison of three communities sharing a watershed. SocNat Resour 14:889–899
Vörösmarty C, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers R (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288
Wentz E, Gober P (2007) Determinants of small-area water consumption for the city of Phoenix, Arizona. Water Resour Manage 21(11):1849–1863
World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) 10 facts about water scarcity. http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/water/en. Last accessed 18 Nov 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larson, K.L., Ibes, D.C., Wentz, E.A. (2013). Identifying the Water Conservation Potential of Neighborhoods in Phoenix, Arizona: An Integrated Socio-spatial Approach. In: Lawrence, P. (eds) Geospatial Tools for Urban Water Resources. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4734-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4734-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4733-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4734-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)