Skip to main content

“I Don’t Come from Anywhere”: Exploring the Role of the Geoweb and Volunteered Geographic Information in Rediscovering a Sense of Place in a Dispersed Aboriginal Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of participatory mapping, the geoweb, and volunteered geographic information in rediscovering a sense of place within a physically dispersed Aboriginal community, the Tlowitsis Nation from Northern Vancouver Island. Centered on a community-based research project, this chapter examines how the participatory geoweb might be used by Tlowitsis members to better understand and reconnect with their land-related knowledge, as well as examine the ways in which these technologies serve to re-present place-based memories and facilitate dialogue amongst community members located in different geographic settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberley, D. (1993). Boundaries of home: Mapping for local empowerment. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn, J. B. (2001). Borders, rules and governance: Mapping to catalyse changes in policy and management. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, K. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the western apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodnig, G., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2000). Bridging the gap: The role of spatial information technologies in the integration of traditional environmental knowledge and western science. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (1981). Maps and dreams: Indians and the British Columbia frontier. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Perkins, D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. (1996). Whose knowledge, whose genes, whose rights? In S. B. Brush & D. Stabinsky (Eds.), Valuing local knowledge: Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Skyland: Kivaki Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Skyland: Kivaki Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada (1996). Royal commission on aboriginal peoples. Volume 1: Looking forward, looking back. Ottawa: Canada Communication Group. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20071115053257/http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ch/rcap/sg/sgmm_e.html. Accessed July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, M., Lamb, M., & Threlkeld, B. (2005). Mapping indigenous land. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisler, S. (2007). Open geography: New tools and new initiatives. Santa Clara: Center for Science Technology and Society, Santa Clara University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of producers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4, 332–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. (2005). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40(4), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. M., Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P., Weiner, D., Olsen, R., Muchemi, J., & Chambers, R. (2006). Overview – Mapping for change the emergence of a new practice. Participatory Learning and Action, 54, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London/New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J. (2009). Cartography maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 3(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J., & Krygier, J. (2006). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME, 4(1), 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2002). An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(March), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, V. (2001). American Indian metaphysics. In V. Deloria & D. Wildcat (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 1–6). Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, V., & Wildcat, D. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gessa, S. (2008). Participatory mapping as a tool for empowerment: Experiences and lessons learned from the ILC network. Rome: International Land Coalition. http://www.landcoalition.org/pdf/08_ILC_Participatory_Mapping_Low.pdf. Accessed July 2011.

  • Dunn, C. (2007). Participatory GIS: A people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, G. L. (2006). Decolonizing geographic information systems. MA thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72, 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20(2), 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fentress, J., & Wickham, C. (1992). Social memory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72(3), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavelle, A. (1996). Community mapping handbook. Vancouver: Lone Pine Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary censors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, T. (1996). Tribal rights. In S. B. Brush & D. Stabinsky (Eds.), Valuing local knowledge: Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grira, J., & Bédard, Y. (2009). Spatial data uncertainty in the VGI world: Going from consumer to producer. Geomatica, 64(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (1992). From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. The American Sociologist, 23(4), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1988). Maps, knowledge and power. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), The iconography of landscape (pp. 277–312). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelscher, S. (2003). Making place, making race: Performances of whiteness in the Jim Crow South. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3), 657–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6), 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A., & Milton, R. (2009). Mapping for the masses: Accessing web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummon, D. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD. (2009). Good practices in participatory mapping. Rome: The International Fund for Agricultural Development (Prepared by J. M. Corbett, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B., Schulz, A., Parker, E., & Becker, A. (1998). Review of community based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1992). Lore: Capturing traditional environmental knowledge. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today’s internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkness, V. J., & Barnhardt, R. (1991). First nations and higher education: The 4 Rs – respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: Place attachment in the plaza. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C. (1992). Environmental memories. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monmonier, M. (1991). How to lie with maps. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P. (1995). Geomatics, who needs it? Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18(4), 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1987). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundstrom, R. A. (1995). GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2000). Invention, memory, and place. Critical Inquiry, 26(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharl, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary first nations research and some options for first nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. G. (1997). Ignorance and prejudice threaten environmental assessment. Policy Options, 18(2), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, K., Donohue, P., & Stoecker, R. (2003). Community-based research and higher education: Principles and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, K. (2003). Places of memory. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 230–251). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlowitsis Nation. (2009). Tlowitsis nation lands and resources: Planning for the future. Kelowna: The Centre for Social, Spatial and Economic Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlowitsis Nation. (2010). Tlowitsis governance: Values from the past, vision for the future. Kelowna: The Centre for Social, Spatial and Economic Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, T. (2009). Living proof: The essential data-collection guide for indigenous use-and-occupancy map surveys. Vancouver: Union of BC Indian Chiefs and Ecotrust Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, D. (2008). Is volunteered geographic information participation? GeoJournal, 72(3/4), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1999). A guidebook for field projects: Participatory research for sustainable livelihood. New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, J., & Bryan, J. (2009). Cartography, territory, property: postcolonial reflections on indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize. Cultural Geographies, 16, 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2008). The theoretical, historical and practical roots of CBPR. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 25–46). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemigwans, J. (2008). Indigenous worldviews: Cultural expression on the world wide web. Canadian Woman Studies, 26(3/4), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J., Beavon, K., & Maxim, P. (2003). Aboriginal conditions: Research as a foundation for public policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). The exchange of indigenous knowledge. New York: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/html/afr/ik/exchange.htm. Accessed May 2005.

  • Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38, 1322–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter could not have been written without both the commitment to research and the financial support of the Tlowitsis Treaty Office, in particular the Chief Negotiator Ken Smith and Treaty researcher Zach Romano. Furthermore, it reflects the views of many Tlowitsis members who have been, and continue to be, overwhelmingly gracious in sharing their time, experiences, and involvement. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada funds the geoweb project described in this chapter. Geolive has been developed using funding from the GEOIDE network Project 41.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Corbett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corbett, J. (2013). “I Don’t Come from Anywhere”: Exploring the Role of the Geoweb and Volunteered Geographic Information in Rediscovering a Sense of Place in a Dispersed Aboriginal Community. In: Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics