Skip to main content

Abstract

The chick aortic arch assay represents a major modification of the rat aortic ring assay. Originally developed for the specific purpose of testing thalidomide (which had previously been shown to have limited effects in rodents but strong effects in chick embryos), the assay avoids the use of laboratory animals, is rapid, with an assay time of 1–3days, and can be carried out in serum-free medium. Aortic arches are dissected from day 12–14 chick embryos and cut into rings similar to those of the rat aorta. When the rings are placed on Matrigel, substantial outgrowth of cells occurs within 48h, with the formation of vessel-like structures readily apparent. If the aortic arch is everted before explanting, the time for observing endothelial cell outgrowth can be reduced to 24h. Both growth-stimulating factors, such as VEGF-A or FGF-2, as well as inhibitory substances such as endostatin, can be added to the medium, where their effect becomes easily measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nicosia R, Ottinetti A (1990) Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab Invest 63:115–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muthukkaruppan V, Shinners B, Lewis R et al (2000) The chick embryo aortic arch assay: a new, rapid quantifiable in vitro method for testing the efficacy of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in a three-dimensional, serum-free organ culture system. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 41:65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auerbach R (2006) An overview of current angiogenesis assays: choice of assay, precautions in interpretation, future requirements. In: Staton C, Lewis C, Bicknell R (eds) Angiogenesis assays. Wiley, Chichester, pp 361–374

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Auerbach R (2008) Models for angiogenesis. In: Figg WD, Folkman J (eds) Angiogenesis: an integrative approach from science to medicine. Springer, New York, pp 299–312

    Google Scholar 

  5. Auerbach R, Lewis R, Shinners Bl N et al (2003) Angiogenesis assays: a critical overview. Clin Chem 49:32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akhtar N, Dickerson EB, Auerbach R (2002) The sponge/Matrigel angiogenesis assay. Angiogenesis 5:75–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isaacs JS, Jung YJ, Mimnaugh EG, Martinez A et al (2002) Hsp90 regulates a von Hippel Lindau-independent hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha-degradative pathway. J Biol Chem 277:29936–29944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez A, Zudaire E, Portal-Nunez S et al (2004) Proadrenomedullin NH2-terminal 20 peptide is a potent angiogenic factor, and its inhibition results in reduction of tumor growth. Cancer Res 64:6489–6494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wen W, Lu J, Zhang K, Chen S (2008) Grape seed extract inhibits angiogenesis via suppression of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathway. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 1:554–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang K, Lu J, Mori T, Smith-Powell L et al (2011) Baicalin increases VEGF expression and angiogenesis by activating the ERR{alpha}/PGC-1{alpha} pathway. Cardiovasc Res 89:426–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh S-H, Kim W-Y, Kim J-H et al (2006) Identification of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 as a farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH55335-induced negative regulator of angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 12:653–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamburger V, Hamilton H (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wikipedia (2011) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamburger-Hamilton_stages

  14. Folberg R, Hendrix MJ, Maniotis A (2000) Vasculogenic mimicry and tumor angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 156:361–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Globerson A, Auerbach R (1965) Primary immune reactions in organ cultures. Science 149:991–993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mishell RI, Dutton RW (1966) Immunization of normal mouse spleen cell suspensions in vitro. Science 153:1004–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The assay method described in this manuscript was developed with the able participation of B Shinners, R Lewis, S-J Park, B Baechler and L Kubai. We thank Wanda Auerbach for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Auerbach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auerbach, R., Muthukkaruppan, V. (2012). The Chick Embryo Aortic Arch Assay. In: Zudaire, E., Cuttitta, F. (eds) The Textbook of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis: Methods and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4581-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics