Skip to main content

Governing Schooling, People and Practices: Australian Policies on Transitions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter analysed Australian State and Territory policies on the transition from school to post-school life. The chapter used two lenses to give multiple understandings of transition. The first lens, a content analysis of the policies using Leximancer software, identified five themes that were significant across all State policies. These themes were students, school, young people, assessment and skills. This analysis showed that the school was depicted in these documents as a bridge between students and young people, and between school and work. The second lens, a fine-grained critical discourse analysis of selected extracts from the documents, traced discourses on transition in the policies and related these discourses to the wider social context. The analysis showed that the policy discourses defined transitions in terms of the problem of economic productivity, which in turn was defined by school retention and completion rates. Increased economic prosperity was to be gained through policies that mandated participation in, and engagement with, schooling, indicating a view of young people as a problem requiring government intervention. The policies sought to regulate young people and schooling through policy discourses that steered changes in the practices of senior secondary schooling. That is, the policy discourses realised spaces for the governance of schooling and young people as they constructed frameworks for actions aimed at increasing school retention and completion rates in order to build a skilled workforce to ensure economic prosperity. The analysis found that this heavy emphasis on economic productivity was mitigated by a focus on social inclusion resulting from the governing rationality of social investment. This rationality constrained the practices available to young people, placing a heavy emphasis on linear progressions from school to post-school life. However, the presence of alternative discourses, such as those that discussed social inclusion in human terms, attested to the inherently unstable nature of the policy process and to possibilities for challenges to, and contestation of, policy discourses as they are enacted in local sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Commonwealth of Australia is made up of six states and two territories; under the Australian constitution, each of the state and territory governments has responsibility for the provision of school education in that jurisdiction. For this reason, the analysis of policies for transition will focus on state and territory policies.

References

  • Allan, S. (1998). News from nowhere: Televisual news discourse and the construction of hegemony. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 105–141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Thomas, S., Sim, C., Johnson, G., Hay, S., & Ryan, J. (2010). Constructing productive post-school transitions: An analysis of Australian schooling policies. Journal of Education and Work, 23(5), 471–489. doi:10.1080/13639080.2010.526596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactment in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codd, J. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Science and Training. (2005). Australian network of industry careers advisers directions paper. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment Education and Training. (2006). School to work transition strategic plan 2007–2009. Darwin, Australia: Northern Territory Government. Retrieved October 30, 2009, from https://www.det.nt.gov.au/rto/vet/school-to-work-transition.

  • Exley, S., Braun, A., & Ball, S. J. (2011). Global education policy: Networks and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 52(3), 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London/New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001a). The discourse of New Labour: Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data (pp. 229–266). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001b). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse and text: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2004). Critical discourse analysis in researching language in New Capitalism: Overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis. In L. Young & C. Harrison (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis: Studies in social change (pp. 103–122). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (pp. 53–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia. (2006). Success for all: Report to the Minister for Education and Children’s Services on the review of the South Australian Certificate of Education (SACE). Adelaide, Australia: SACE Review Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Tasmania. (2007). Shaping a thinking future: Qualifications and skills for Tasmania tomorrow. Hobart, Australia: Printing Authority of Tasmania. Retrieved October 30, 2009, from http://tomorrow.education.tas.gov.au/.

  • Government of Western Australia. (2007). Strategic plan 2007–2009. Perth, Australia: Department of Education and Training. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://policies.det.wa.edu.au/our_policies/ti_view?uid=78335cb32ee5dfa8eea499c42a512112iview=summary_view.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, S. (2009). Transforming social and educational governance: Trade training centres and the transition to social investment politics in Australia. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, S., & Kapitzke, C. (2009). School industry partnerships: Constituting spaces of global governance. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, globalisation and education policy. Oxford, UK: IAU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, P. (2000). Ministerial review of post-compulsory education and training pathways in Victoria: Final report. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Training (DEET).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leximancer Manual (Version 3). (2008). Leximancer: The why, not just the what. Brisbane, Australia: Leximancer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi: DOI:10.1080/17508481003731026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Hogan, D. (2006). Redesigning what counts as evidence in education policy: The Singapore model. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. Popekwitz (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2006: Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge-based economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Ball, S. J., & Braun, A. (2010). Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the English secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), 153–170. doi:10.1080/09620214.2010.503066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge, UK: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Education & Training. (2006). Our 15 to 19 year olds – Opportunities & choice: An education and training strategy for 15 to 19 year olds in NSW 2006–2009. Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Education & Training. Retrieved April 4, 2008, from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/strat_direction/schools/index.htm.

  • OECD. (2009). Education today: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD Publications. Retrieved April 21, 2009, from www.oecd.org/edu/educationtoday.

  • Peters, M. (2001). National education policy constructions of the ‘knowledge economy’: Towards a critique. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placier, M., Walker, M., & Foster, B. (2002). Writing the “show-me” standards: Teacher professionalism and political control in US state curriculum policy. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(3), 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1992). Governing the enterprising self. In P. Heelas & P. Morris (Eds.), The values of the enterprise culture: The moral debate (pp. 141–164). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Inventiveness in politics. Economy and Society, 28(3), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the third way, 43(9), 1395–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, T. (2005). ‘Quality’ in the Bologna Process: from ‘competitive edge’ to quality assurance techniques. Education Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behaviour Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2010). Speaking back to education policy: Why social inclusion will not work for disadvantaged Australian schools. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 113–128. doi:10.1080/17508481003742320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State of Queensland. (2002). Queensland the smart state – Education and training reforms for the future: A white paper. Available from http://education.qld.gov.au/etrf/whitepaper/index.html Accessed 22 Apr 2008.

  • Thomas, S. (2005). The construction of teacher identities in educational policy documents: A critical discourse analysis. Melbourne Studies in Education, 46(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2006). Education policy in the media: Public discourses on education. Teneriffe, Australia: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organisational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this chapter was undertaken as part of the Australian Research Council Discovery Project ‘Towards a transformative model: re-shaping transitions between school and post-school life’ (2008–2010). The authors also acknowledge the support of their research colleagues in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, S., Hay, S. (2012). Governing Schooling, People and Practices: Australian Policies on Transitions. In: Billett, S., Johnson, G., Thomas, S., Sim, C., Hay, S., Ryan, J. (eds) Experience of School Transitions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4198-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics