Abstract
The fast development and variety of civil and commercial relations within the EU generates an urgent need for efficient harmonization. In order to have a functional internal market the EU needs an adequate civil procedure and an efficient enforcement of claims. The development of new information technology has a substantial effect on the enforcement of claims. The recent developments in this field had a significant impact on the Romanian law system as well. In 2009 the Romanian Government passed the new Civil Procedure Code. The new code brings important amendments which contribute to the improvement of the debt recovery procedure and the modernization of service rules – with the use of new modern IT tools, such as e-mail or other internet applications. Romania has made substantial progress in implementing the secured IT network and interconnection between institutions. The Romanian Ministry of Justice is aiming to interconnect the IT system within the judiciary with other IT systems within the public service, nationwide and at the European level as well and exploring the possibilities of an e-filing system. The creation of an international enforcement procedure, by which foreign creditors could directly interact online with the courts and enforcing agencies of another State, is very important but challenging in the same time. This future system must be fast and safe; it should preserve and safeguard the rights of the debtor and serve the interests of the creditors in the same time.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
M. W. Hesselink, “The Ideal of Codification and the Dynamics of Europeanisation: The Dutch Experience,” in European Law Journal 12, no. 3 (2006): 279–305.
- 2.
M. Eliantonio, “The Future of National Procedural Law in Europe: Harmonisation vs. Judge-made Standards in the Field of Administrative Justice” vol. 13.3 (September 2009), 1, see the document at: http://www.ejcl.org/133/art133-4.pdf [10.02.2011].
- 3.
M. Eliantonio, “The Future of National Procedural Law in Europe: Harmonisation vs. Judge-made Standards in the Field of Administrative Justice” vol. 13.3 (September 2009), 5, see the document at: http://www.ejcl.org/133/art133-4.pdf [10.02.2011].
- 4.
M. Eliantonio, “The Future of National Procedural Law in Europe: Harmonisation vs. Judge-made Standards in the Field of Administrative Justice” vol. 13.3 (September 2009), 10, see the document at: http://www.ejcl.org/133/art133-4.pdf [10.02.2011]
- 5.
M. Eliantonio, “The Future of National Procedural Law in Europe: Harmonisation vs. Judge-made Standards in the Field of Administrative Justice” (Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper, 2008–8).
- 6.
M. Eliantonio, “The Future of National Procedural Law in Europe: Harmonisation vs. Judge-made Standards in the Field of Administrative Justice” (Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper, 2008–8).
- 7.
See the information provided by the European Commission at: http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/enforce_judgement/enforce_judgement_rom_en.htm [10.02.2011].
- 8.
See the information provided by the European Commission at: http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/enforce_judgement/enforce_judgement_rom_en.htm [10.02.2011].
- 9.
IT Strategy for the Reform of the Judiciary – see the information provided by the Romanian Ministry of Justice at http://www.just.ro/Sections/SistemulJudiciar%C3%AEnRom%C3%A2nia/ITSTRATEGYFORTHEREFORMOFTHEJUDICIARY20052/tabid/249/Default.aspx [10.02.2011].
- 10.
IT Strategy for the Reform of the Judiciary – see the information provided by the Romanian Ministry of Justice at http://www.just.ro/Sections/SistemulJudiciar%C3%AEnRom%C3%A2nia/ITSTRATEGYFORTHEREFORMOFTHEJUDICIARY20052/tabid/249/Default.aspx [10.02.2011].
- 11.
IT Strategy for the Reform of the Judiciary – see the information provided by the Romanian Ministry of Justice at http://www.just.ro/Sections/SistemulJudiciar%C3%AEnRom%C3%A2nia/ITSTRATEGYFORTHEREFORMOFTHEJUDICIARY20052/tabid/249/Default.aspx [10.02.2011].
- 12.
See information provided by the Romanian Ministry of Justice at: http://portal.just.ro/ [10.02.2011].
- 13.
See information provided by the Romanian Ministry of Justice at: http://portal.just.ro/InstantaDosareLista.aspx?idInstitutie=300http://portal.just.ro/InstantaDosareLista.aspx?idInstitutie=300 [10.02.2011].
- 14.
Improving the institutional framework of family and civil litigation in Romania – summary of final working sessions – September 2007, see the document at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADL213.pdf [10.02.2011].
- 15.
Speeding up the Bankruptcy Process Lessons from Romania – Bizclir, 3, see the document at: http://www.bizclir.com/galleries/bestpractices/01.128.08BP15_Romania.pdf [10.02.2011].
- 16.
Speeding up the Bankruptcy Process Lessons from Romania – Bizclir, 3, see the document at: http://www.bizclir.com/galleries/bestpractices/01.128.08BP15_Romania.pdf [10.02.2011].
- 17.
See information provided by the Insolvency Proceedings Bulletin at: http://www.buletinulinsolventei.ro/ [10.02.2011].
- 18.
See information provided at: http://www.executari.com/ [10.02.2011].
- 19.
See information provided at: http://www.executarisilite.eu/ [10.02.2011].
- 20.
European commission for the efficiency of justice (cepej) – enforcement of court decisions in Europe, Report prepared by the Research Team on enforcement of court decisions (University Nancy (France)/Swiss Institute of comparative law) and discussed by the CEPEJ-GT-EVAL at their 8th meeting, see the document provided by the Council of Europe at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/series/Etudes8Execution_en.pdf [10.02.2011].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rikhárd-Árpád, P. (2012). Enforcement of a Claim with the Support of the New Information Technology in the European Union, Romanian Case Study. In: Kengyel, M., Nemessányi, Z. (eds) Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4071-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4072-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)