Abstract
Assessment, in whatever form it takes, is widely recognised as one of the main determinants of educational practice. Over the past few years, new approaches to assessment have emerged in a number of countries. This chapter addresses the issues for teaching and learning that emerge when school-based assessment of science practical work is mandated, its contribution to teaching and learning and, in particular, how teachers’ beliefs and teacher professionalism become involved. Drawing on cases from Hong Kong and Singapore, through illustrations of the teachers’ professional actions, their struggles, worries, concerns as well as their visions and aspirations, this chapter brings into light the crucial role of teachers in mediation and in bringing about changes envisaged in the new assessment reform. Implications for teacher professional development are also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, E. L. (2007). Principles for scaling up. In B. L. Schneider & S–. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle (Vol. 1, pp. 37–54). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer Press.
Black, P., & Atkin, J. A. (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). ‘In praise of educational research’: Formative assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 623–637.
Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54.
Cheng, M. W., Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., & Hodson, D. (2010). Mediating inquiry: Using videos of exemplary teaching in pre-service teacher education. In O. Kwo (Ed.), Teachers as learners: Critical discourse on challenges and opportunities (pp. 109–132). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC), HKU/Springer.
Choi, C. C. (1999). Public examinations in Hong Kong. Assessment in Education, 6(3), 405–417.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.
Coolahan, J. (2002). Teacher education and the teaching career in an era of lifelong learning (OECD Education Working Paper, Number 2). Paris: Education Directorate, OECD. Available online at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teacher-education-and-the-teaching-career-in-an-era-of-lifelong-learning_226408628504. Last accessed on 20 May 2011. doi: 10.1878/19939019.
Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models. Journal of In-service Education, 33(2), 153–169.
Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – Tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.
Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development (CPD): A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235–250.
Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (1997). Professional development in residence: Developing reflection on science teaching and learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23(2), 159–178.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2002). Curriculum planning and development division. Intranet Website. Retrieved August 15, 2005, from http://intranet.moe.edu.sg/cpdd/
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Rodrigues, S. (2005). A model of teacher professional development: The partnership in the primary science project. New York: Nova Science.
Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Sadler, R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63, 66–70.
Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, J., & Theis-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.
Tan, A. K., & Towndrow, P. A. (2009). Catalyzing student-teacher interactions and teacher learning in science practical formative assessment with digital video technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 61–67.
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and improvement in science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730.
Towndrow, P. A. (2008). Critical reflective practice as a pivot in transforming science education: A report of teacher-researcher collaborative interactions in response to assessment reforms. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 903–922.
Towndrow, P. A., Tan, A.-K., Yung, B. H. W., & Cohen, L. (2010). Science teachers’ professional development and changes in science practical assessment practices: What are the issues? Research in Science Education, 40, 117–132.
Yip, D. Y., & Cheung, D. (2005). Teachers’ concerns on school-based assessment of practical work. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4), 156–162.
Yung, B. H. W. (2001). Examiners, policeman and students’ companion: Teachers’ perceptions of their role in an assessment reform. Educational Review, 53(3), 251–260.
Yung, B. H. W. (2002). Same assessment, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme. Assessment in Education, 9(1), 101–121.
Yung, B. H. W. (2006). Assessment reform in science: Fairness and fear. Dordrecht: Springer.
Yung, B. H. W., Wong, S. L., Cheng, M. W., Hui, C. S., & Hodson, D. (2007). Tracking pre-service teachers’ changing conceptions of good science teaching: The role of progressive reflection with the same video. Research in Science Education, 37(3), 239–259.
Yung, B. H. W., Yip, V. W. Y., Lai, C., & Lo, F. Y. (2010, February 15–16). Towards a model of effective use of video for teacher professional development. Invited presentation in the International Research and Development Seminar on Continuing Professional Development for Science Teachers held in York University, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yung, B.H.W. (2012). Issues and Challenges in School-Based Assessment of Science Practical Work. In: Tan, K., Kim, M. (eds) Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3979-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3980-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)