Abstract
This chapter explores the contributions of the capability approach to technological aid projects implemented in small communities or villages. To achieve that objective we examine the evolution of technology-oriented development projects and the limitations of its current conceptualisation. After exploring the capability approach, we present a new framework for technology within the context of human development, the Technologies for Freedom (T4F). Throughout the chapter we introduce three case studies of power projects implemented in rural villages. The cases are funded by similar donors, and obtain the same results (ends) in the space of resources – a sufficient amount of energy for the communities. Nevertheless, the results differ in terms of processes (means) such as participation and empowerment of people. This chapter aims to show how technological artefacts (products, equipments, etc.) and organizational processes and relationships are ends of community interventions; but they also represent the means that allow people to do and to achieve whatever goals or values they regard as important, enhancing the ability of the community to help themselves to make changes happen. And, what is more important, that people can collectively become agents of change rather than being simple recipients of aid. Thus, we conclude that technology-oriented development projects can be vehicles for expanding people’s freedom (individual capabilities) but also to enhance their ability (individually and as a group) to pursue goals they consider valuable (agency).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Engineers Without Borders in many developed countries; Practical Action or Tearfund in UK; Village Earth, AIDG or Whitman Direct Action in USA; Centre for Appropriate Technology in Australia; among others.
- 3.
References
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction (Queen Elizabeth house series in development studies). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2005). Subjective quantitative studies of human agency. Social Indicators Research, 74, 217–260.
Alkire, S. (2008). Concepts and measures of agency. In K. Basu & K. Ravi (Eds.), Arguments for a better world: Essays in honor of Amartya Sen. Vol. I: Ethics, welfare and measurement (pp. 455–474). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2009). Human development and capability approach. In S. Deneulin, L. Shahani, S. Deneulin, & L. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to human development and capability approach (Vol. 22). London: Earthscan.
Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L., & Mahieu, F. (2007). Responsibility for each other’s freedom: Agency as the source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 8(2), 185.
Behari, B. (1976). Rural industrialization in India. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
Brandão, F. C. (2001). Programa de apoio às tecnologias apropiadas - PTA: Avaliação de um programa de desenvolvimento tecnológico induzido pelo CNPq. Brasilia: UnB.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology.
Comim, F., & Kuklys, W. (2002). Is poverty about poor individuals? Paper presented at 27th general conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Djurham.
Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dagnino, R. (1976). Tecnologia apropiada: Uma alternativa? Brasilia: UnB.
Dagnino, R., et al. (2006). Política científica e tecnológica e tecnología social: Buscando conver-gência. In Registro do forum nacional da RTS. Brasilia: Abipti.
Deneulin, S., & Stewart, F. (2001). A capability approach for individuals living together. Paper presented at Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach, Cambridge.
Deneulin, S., & Stewart, F. (2002). Amartya Sen’s contribution to development thinking. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 63.
Dubois, A. (2006). El enfoque de las capacidades. In Alejandra Boni, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, & Intermon-ISF (Eds.), Construir la ciudadanía global desde la universidad. Barcelona: Publicaciones ISF.
Dufumier, M. (1996). Les projets de développement agricole, manuel d’expertise. Khartala: Broché.
Evans, P. (2002). Collective capabilities, culture and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 54.
Fernández-Baldor, Á., Hueso, A., & Boni, A. (2009, September 12–14). Technologies for freedom: Collective agency-oriented technology for development processes. Paper presented at the Human Development and Capability Approach Conference. Lima.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economist, 9(2–3), 301–317.
Gasper, D. (2007). What is the capability approach?: Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 335–359.
Goodman, L. J. (1976). Appropriate technology study: Some background concepts, issues, examples and recommendations (Vol. IV). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
Herrera, A. (1983). Transferencia de tecnología y tecnologías apropiadas: Contribución a una visión prospectiva a largo plazo (Tesis doctoral, Unicamp. Campinas (Brazil)).
Hueso, A. (2007). Estudio sobre el impacto social, económico y ambiental de pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas implantadas en comunidades rurales de la paz, bolivia. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València.
Ibrahim, S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 7(3), 397–416.
James, B. (1995). The impacts of rural electrification: Exploring the silences. Cape Town: Energy Development and Research Center.
Kumar, K. (1993). Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Perspectivas: Revista Trimestral De Ed-ucación Comparada, XXIII, 535–547.
Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2006). The slow race. Making technology work for the poor. London: Demos.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1987). Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution (Working Papers 1987/31). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capability approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pérez-Foguet, A., Lobo, M., & Saz, Á. (2005). Introducción a la cooperación al desarrollo en las ingenierías: Una propuesta para el estudio.Associació Catalana d’Enginyeria Sense Fronteres.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2, 3), 61.
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6, 93–117.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. Economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper and Row.
Sen, A. (1979). Sobre la desigualdad económica. Madrid: Editorial Crítica.
Sen, A. (1982). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlements and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1989). Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 44–58.
Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. New York/Oxford: Russell Sage Foundation/Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Belknap.
Shiva, V. (2009). The seed and the spinnig wheel: The UNDP as biotech salesman. [cited June, 09 2009]. Available from http://www.poptel.org.uk/panap/latest/seedwheel.htm
Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.
Ul Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2001). Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2005). Human development report 2005: International cooperation at a crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. United Nations Development Programme.
Walker, M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies. A capabilities approach. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Watts, M., & Bridges, D. (2006). Enhancing students’ capabilities? UK higher education and the widening participation agenda. In S. Deneulin, M. Nebel, & N. Sagovski (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures. Dordrecht: Springer.
White, L. J. (1974). Appropriate technology and a competitive environment: Some evidence from Pakistan (Discussion Papers (46), ITS).
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Alex Frediani, from the Development Planning Unit of the UCL, for his valuable comments to the different drafts of this chapter. We wish to thank as well Ilse Oosterlaken and her colleagues at Delft University for their efforts to introduce discussions on technology into the Human Development and Capability Approach community. Finally, we really appreciate the support of our University, particularly the Centro de Cooperación al Desarrollo, to carry out our research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernández-Baldor, Á., Hueso, A., Boni, A. (2012). From Individuality to Collectivity: The Challenges for Technology-Oriented Development Projects. In: Oosterlaken, I., van den Hoven, J. (eds) The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3878-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3879-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)