Skip to main content

“How I Learned to Love the Robot”: Capabilities, Information Technologies, and Elderly Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Capability Approach, Technology and Design

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 5))

Abstract

Information technologies seem promising when it comes to improving elderly care, but they also raise ethical worries, for example about privacy, human contact, and justice. This paper argues that the capability approach is a helpful tool to make explicit what is at stake in this context and to discuss the relevant ethical issues. However, it is also proposed that we modify the capability approach by adopting a non-instrumental view of technology that takes into account how particular technologies change the meaning of the capabilities. This idea is further developed into suggestions for an ethical-hermeneutical interpretation of the capability approach, which involves the use of techno-moral imagination. To illustrate this, the paper explores and discusses an elderly care scenario in which people’s capabilities for social affiliation and engagement in relations with non-humans are transformed by information technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I limit the topic of this chapter to ethics of elderly care but the capability approach can be more widely applied across various domains of ethics and ethics of technology.

  2. 2.

    This argument can also be applied to health care in general (Coeckelbergh 2010a, b).

  3. 3.

    Note that judging a particular life to be ‘not worth living’ does not necessarily imply that it is therefore justified to end such a life (e.g. suicide or euthanasia). On the contrary, it seems that a capability approach would rather require us to help the person to reach the minimum level. And if this were impossible, then there may be other ethical considerations for blocking the suicide or euthanasia option.

  4. 4.

    My use of a fictional scenario is inspired by my research on moral imagination (Coeckelbergh 2007) and by collaboration with Tsjalling Swierstra on moral change and techno-moral scenarios, in particular my experience of writing scenarios about nanotechnology for his ‘Vignetten en scenario’s’ Nanopodium project (2009–2010).

  5. 5.

    Care Capsule: semi-closed system for habitation, monitoring, and care of elderly people over 100.

  6. 6.

    The term ‘realizability’ suggests that the capabilities and their meaning are fixed, whereas there might be different interpretations about how to realize them in practice. This may be right, but in the light of the ideas presented in this chapter, I prefer to interpret Nussbaum on this point as meaning that the capabilities themselves are also up to interpretation (and indeed negotiation).

References

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination and principles. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2010a). Human development or human enhancement? A methodological reflection on capabilities and the evaluation of information technologies. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2010b). Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(2), 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D., & Boenink, M. (2009). Exploring techno-moral change: The case of the obesity pill. In P. Sollie & M. Düwell (Eds.), Evaluating new technologies (pp. 119–138). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Coeckelbergh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). “How I Learned to Love the Robot”: Capabilities, Information Technologies, and Elderly Care. In: Oosterlaken, I., van den Hoven, J. (eds) The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics