Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research pp 291–334Cite as

Toward a Greater Understanding of the Effects of State Merit Aid Programs: Examining Existing Evidence and Exploring Future Research Direction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 27))

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the effects of state merit aid programs on student educational decisions and educational outcomes for the policy states. We argue for the need to broaden the perspectives to reflect the interests of students, states, and the country as a whole in order to gain a greater understanding of the effects of state merit aid programs in a context of increasing national need in enhancing student educational attainment and international competitiveness. We discuss some theoretical and methodological issues in studying the effects of state merit aid programs and suggest some future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2001). Access denied: Restoring the nation’s commitment to equal educational opportunity. Washington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2002). Empty promise: The myths of college access in America. Washington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2010). The rising price of inequality: How inadequate grant aid limits college access and persistence. Washington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K. L., & Eckland, B. K. (1975). Basic attainment processes: A replication and extension. Sociology of Education, 48, 457–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn, E. (2010, August 8). Gates’ millions: Can big bucks turn students into graduates? Chronicle of Higher Education, Daily News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. A., & Card, D. (1985). Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 648–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, E. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In C. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., Ganderton, P. T., & Hutchens, K. (2002). Incentive effects of New Mexico’s merit-based state scholarship program: Who responds and how? In D. Heller & P. Marin (Eds.), Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships (pp. 42–56). Cambridge: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. J., Fuller, B., & Loeb S. (2010). Editor’s introduction. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. (2008). Financial aid and student dropout in higher education: A heterogeneous research approach. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 23, pp. 209–239). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T. (2010). American universities in a global market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T, & Rothschild, M. (Eds.). (1993). Studies of supply and demand in higher education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, K., Albee, A., & Spence, M. (2008). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22, 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., & Mustard, D. B. (2001). HOPE scholarship affects where, not whether, students attend college. Public policy research series (Vol. 2, no. 10.). Athens: Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., & Mustard, D. B. (2002). HOPE, the brain drain, and diversity: The impact of the scholarship on high achievers and African Americans. Policy Notes, 3(4), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., & Mustard, D. B. (2003). Georgia’s HOPE scholarship program: Enrollment gains and lottery finance. Insights on Southern Poverty, 1(3), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., & Mustard, D. B. (2006). Evaluating HOPE-style merit scholarships. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Innovation in Education Conference Proceedings, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., Lee, K. H., & Mustard, D. B. (2005). Student responses to merit scholarship retention rules. The Journal of Human Resources, 40(4), 895–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., Lee, K. H., & Mustard, D. B. (2006a). The effects of state-sponsored merit scholarships on course selection and major choice in college. IZA Discussion Paper #1953. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. M., Mustard, D. B., & Sridhar, D. J. (2006b). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(4), 761–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S., & Jackson, L. A. (1999). Who loses HOPE? Attrition from Georgia’s college scholarship program. Southern Economic Journal, 66(2), 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. A. (2007). The academic consequences of state merit aid: The case of Kentucky. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. A., & Ness, E. (2009, November). A state-level merit aid typology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. R. (2008). Access, choice, and excellence: The competing goals of state financial aid programs. In S. Baum, M. McPherson, & P. Steele (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: What the research tells us (pp. 159–188). New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. R. (2010). Does merit-based aid “crowd out” need-based aid? Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 629–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2004). The new merit aid. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynarski, S. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 576–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., & Gijbels, I. (1996). Local polynomial modeling and its applications. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Education. (2008). Annual report to the commissioner (2007–08). Tallahassee: Office of Student Financial Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Education. (2010). Florida Bright Futures Scholarship program fact sheet. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. C. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (2004). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldrick-Rab, S., Harris, D. N., & Trostel, P. A. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: Toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 1–45). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J. (2010, August 9). In Texas speech, Obama renews his educational goals for the nation. Chronicle of Higher Education, Daily News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, J. A. (2004). The effect of college location on migration of college-educated labor. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkreader, S., Hughes, J. Hicks-Tozzi, M., & Vanlandingham, G.,(2008). The impact of Florida’s Bright Futures Scholarship Program on high school performance and college enrollment. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 38(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. (1993). The paradox of growth in federal aid for college students: 1965–1990. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C., & Longanecker, D. (1985). Enrollment effects of alternative postsecondary pricing policies. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebel, S. (2009). Lumina’s leader sets lofty goals for fund’s role in policy debates. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(34), A1–A12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update of Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 624–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (2002). State merit scholarship programs: An introduction. In D. E. Heller & P. Marin (Eds.), Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships (pp. 15–23). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E. (2004) State merit scholarship programs: An overview. In D. E. Heller & P. Marin (Eds.) State merit scholarship programs and racial inequality. Cambridge: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E., & Marin, P. (Eds.). (2002). Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit aid scholarships. Cambridge: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. E., & Marin, P. (2004). State merit scholarship programs and racial inequality. Cambridge: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, G. T., & Rubenstein, R. (2002). Paying for grades: Impact of merit-based financial aid on educational quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, G. T., Rubenstein, R., & Bugler, D. T. (2004). Is HOPE enough: Impacts of receiving and losing merit-based financial aid. Educational Policy, 18, 686–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., & Stage, F. K. (1992). Family and high school experience influences on the postsecondary educational plans of ninth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 425–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Braxton, J., & Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 231–288). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Schmit, J., & Vesper, N. (1998). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Ziskin, M., Gross, J. P. K., Kim, S., & Cekic, O. (2009). Student aid and its role in encouraging persistence. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 24, pp. 389–425). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. M. (2004). College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. (2005). Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. (2008, May). Merit-based aid and student enrollment in baccalaureate degree programs in science and engineering: An examination of Florida’s Bright Futures program. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & Hossler, D. (2000). Willingness to pay and preference for private institutions. Research in Higher Education, 41, 685–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & St. John, E. P. (2001). Student persistence in a public higher education system: Understanding racial/ethnic differences. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, D. A., & Page, M. E. (1996). Degrees matter: New evidence on sheepskin effects in the returns to education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., & Rouse, C. E. (1995). Labor-market returns to two- and four-year colleges. American Economic Review, 85(3), 600–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J. (1972). Community college and social stratification. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 521–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazis, R., Vargas, J., & Hoffman, N. (Eds.) (2004). Double the numbers: Increasing postsecondary credentials for underrepresented youth. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational & social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesik, S. A. (2006). Applying the regression discontinuity design to infer causality with nonrandom assignment. Review of Higher Education, 30, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Brinkman, P. T. (1987). Student price response in higher education: The student demand studies. Journal of Higher Education, 58(2), 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Brinkman, P. T. (1988). The economic value of higher education>. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. T. (2004). How do financial aid policies affect colleges? The institutional impact of the Georgia HOPE scholarship. Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 1045–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2): 698–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher Learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1994). Merit aid: Students, institutions, and society. New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. S., & Shapiro, M. O. (1998). The student aid game: Meeting need and rewarding talent in American higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T. (2008). Quality matters: Assessing the impact of attending more selective institutions on college completion rates of minorities. Research in Higher Education, 49, 214–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T. (2010). Are students of color more likely to graduate from college if they attend more selective institutions? Evidence from a cohort of recipients and nonrecipients of the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 230–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmarquette, C., Cannings, K., & Mahseredjian, S. (2002). How do young people choose college majors? Economics of Education Review, 21, 543–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Digest of education statistics. Washington: Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2006 (Vol. 1 No. NSB 06–01). Arlington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, E. (2008). Eligibility effects on college access: Under-represented student perceptions of Tennessee’s merit aid program. Research in Higher Education, 49, 569–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsuwan, M., & Heck, R. H. (2009). Merit-based student aid and freshman interstate college migration: Testing a dynamic model of policy change. Research in Higher Education, 50, 24–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from 20 years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2006). Toward a more complete understanding of the role of financial aid in promoting college enrollment: The importance of context. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W. (2010). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 129–179). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna, L. W., & Steele, P. (2011). The role of context in understanding the contributions of financial aid to college opportunity. Teachers College Record, 113, 895–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, K. K. (2001). Where college students live after they graduate. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47, 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabot, R., & Wakeman-Linn, J. (1991). Grade inflation and course choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Clayton, J. (2009). On money and motivation: A quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Working paper. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W., & Hauser, R. (1975). Education, occupation, and earnings: Achievement in early career. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P., & Hu, S. (2006a). The impact of guarantees on financial aid on college enrollment: An evaluation of the Washington State Achievers Program. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and educational opportunity: School reforms, postsecondary encouragement, and sate policies on postsecondary education. Reading on equal education (pp. 213–257). New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P., & Hu, S. (2006b, April). State financial policies and student choice of college and major field: A national study of high-achieving low-income students of color. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P., Asker, E., & Hu, S. (2001). The role of finances in student choice: A review of theory and research. In M. B. Paulsen & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice (pp. 419–438). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, E. P., Hu, S., & Fisher, A. F. (2011). Breaking through the access barrier: Academic capital formation informing policy in higher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd. Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W. (1984). Research design for program evaluation: The regression discontinuity approach. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Klaauw, W. (2002). Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. International Economic Review, 43, 1249–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Klaauw, W. (2008). Breaking the link between poverty and low student achievement: An evaluation of Title I. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 731–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2005). Does quality pay? Benefits of attending a high-cost, prestigious college. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2010). The use of panel data methods in higher education policy studies. In Smart, J. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 309–347). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2011). Does merit-based aid affect degree production in STEM fields? Evidence from Georgia and Florida. Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Ness, E. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Min, Y. K., Frillman, S. A., Anderson, T. J., & Ohland, M. W. (2006). Student strategies for protecting merit-based scholarships: Grades, courseload, and major choice. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Annual Conference. San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter was prepared with financial support from the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant # R305A110609 to Shouping Hu at Florida State University and Liang Zhang at Penn State University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education. The authors would like to thank Laura Perna for her helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, College of Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Shouping Hu & Matthew Trengove

  2. Department of Education Policy Studies, Pennsylvania State University, 310E Rackley Building, University Park, PA, USA

    Liang Zhang

Authors
  1. Shouping Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Trengove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouping Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CEPR, 100 Ball Hall, Memphis, TN, 38152-3570, USA

    John C. Smart

  2. Dept. Educational Policy, &, Leadership Studies, University of Iowa, Lindquist Center N491, Iowa City, 52242-1529, Iowa, USA

    Michael B. Paulsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hu, S., Trengove, M., Zhang, L. (2012). Toward a Greater Understanding of the Effects of State Merit Aid Programs: Examining Existing Evidence and Exploring Future Research Direction. In: Smart, J., Paulsen, M. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation