Abstract
Orthodox and Confucian scholars in this volume look to a general account of ritual as the basis for (1) a critique of modern society, and (2) an apologetic for their traditional communities. I call the project advancing these two elements the traditional ritual project, and I call those who advance this project traditionalists. According to traditionalists, modern societies are deficient because they lack rituals or they have the wrong kinds of rituals. In contrast, traditional communities are seen as having the vital rituals necessary for human flourishing, and they also provide the language and cultural framework that is needed for appreciating the functions of ritual in human life. In this essay, I explore some tensions and problems integral to the traditional ritual project, especially tensions between universalizing and particularizing tendencies. I show that any resolution of these problems must depend on the specific, ritualized content integral to the particular communities, and that traditionalists cannot provide a general account of ritual without simultaneously moving beyond some of the strong claims about particularism and incommensurability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bainton, R. (1977) Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther. Abingdon Press, New York.
Collins, R. (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. (2006) “Traditional Ritual and Contemporary Society: A Commentary on the Essays of this Conference,” presented for the International Symposium on Ritual and Contemporary Society, Hong Kong Baptist University, July 5–7, 2006.
Durkheim, E. (1995) Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Free Press, New York.
Engelhardt, H.T. (1991) Bioethics and Secular Humanism: The Search for a Common Morality. Trinity Press International, Valley Forge, PA.
Engelhardt, H.T. (1996) Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford University Press, New York.
Engelhardt, H.T. (2000) The Foundations of Christian Bioethics. Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse.
Fan, R. (2006) “Confucian Ritualization: How and Why?” presented for the International Symposium on Ritual and Contemporary Society, Hong Kong Baptist University, July 5–7, 2006.
Levi-Strauss, C. (2000) Structural Anthropology. Basic Books, New York.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
MacIntyre, A. (1984) After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Merton, R. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York.
Parsons, T. (2002, 2004) The Structure of Social Action, Vols. I and II. Free Press, New York.
Taylor, C. (1992) Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wang, Q. (1999) “The Confucian filial obligation and care for aged parents,” in R. Fan (ed.), Confucian Bioethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp. 235–256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khushf, G. (2012). The Traditional Ritual Project. In: Solomon, D., Fan, R., Lo, Pc. (eds) Ritual and the Moral Life. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2756-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2756-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2755-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2756-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)