Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 56))

Abstract

Active reduction of disturbing noise requires the generation of appropriate control signals in order to drive the canceling sources. For this purpose we have to organize the signal processing of data provided by sensors. These data contain information about the disturbance as well as about the systems state. Because we assume that we are able to work with reference signals that are well correlated to the disturbing noise, the upcoming chapter is restricted to signal processing in feed-forward control systems. It starts with a mathematical preparation, because we will use some concepts of matrix calculus, see (Zurmühl in Matrizen und ihre technischen Anwendungen, Springer, Berlin, 1964) or (Strang in Introduction to linear algebra, Cambridge University Press, Wellesley, 1993). It is continued with an introduction to feed-forward control signal processing, before we discuss active control of both harmonic excitations and stochastic disturbances. Besides the topic of optimal control, attention is paid to adaptive control that enables the controller to track down non-stationary effects, e.g. the change of the operational speed of a turbo-machinery, or changes in the system response that can be caused by a change of environmental conditions such as ambient pressure, air temperature or humidity as well as by the warming-up of the electro-acoustic equipment. Adaptive feed-forward control of harmonic disturbances is discussed in frequency domain, whereas we will present four time domain approaches for adaptive feed-forward control of stochastic disturbances. However, this chapter is far away from presenting the basics of digital signal processing and digital filters as described in (Antoniou in Digital filters: analysis and design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979), (Bose in Digital filters—theory and applications, Elsevier, New York, 1985), (Diniz in Adaptive filtering—algorithms and practical implementations, Springer, New York, 2008), (Haykin in Adaptive filter theory, Prentice Hall, London, 1996), (Hess in Digitale Filter—Eine Einführung, Teubner, Stuttgart, 1989), (Johnson in Digitale Signalverarbeitung, Hanser, München in Cooperation with Prentice Hall International, London, 1991), and (Lücker in Grundlagen digitaler Filter—Eine Einführung in die Theorie linearer zeitdiskreter Systeme und Netzwerke, 1980) to review the theory of adaptive filtering as presented in (Farhang-Boroujeny in Adaptive filters—theory and applications, Wiley, New York, 1998), (Honig and Messerschmidt in Adaptive filters—structure, algorithms and applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1984), (Sayed in Fundamentals of adaptive filtering, Wiley, Hoboken, 2003) and (Widrow and Stearns in Adaptive signal processing, Prentice Hall International, London, 1985) or to discuss DSP implementations, see (Akpan et al. in Active noise and vibration control literature survey: controller technologies. DREA-CR-1999-177, Contractor Report, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth NS (CAN); MARTEC Ltd, Halifax NS (CAN); Sherbrooke Univ, Sherbrooke QUE (CAN), 1999) and (Chassaing in Digital signal processing and applications with the C6713 and C6416 DSK, Wiley, Canada, 2005). Its intension is to provide a basis for adaptive feed-forward control of low frequency interior noise that also includes algorithmic formulations of the control schemes. The content of the upcoming chapter is therefore oriented on (Kuo and Morgan in Active noise control systems—algorithms and DSP implementations, Wiley, Canada, 1996) and (Elliott in Signal processing for active noise control, Academic Press, London, 2001)—two fundamental books about signal processing for ANC that are (without detailed algorithmic formulations) summarized in (Kuo and Morgan in Proc. IEEE 87(6):943–973, 1999) and (Elliott in Tokhi and Veres (eds.) Active sound and vibration control, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp. 57–72, 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In some textbooks, e.g. (Elliott 2001), the stability criteria (6.26) is motivated by the argument that the iterative mapping (6.28) can also performed with a non-hermitian matrix A. The stability criteria for the in this case complex eigenvalues λ m is given by

    $$\vert 1-\mu\lambda_m\vert < 1 \quad \mbox{i.e.}\ 0 < \mu< \frac{2\operatorname{Re} (\lambda_m )}{\vert \lambda _m\vert ^2} .$$

    As shown in the present subsection, it is not necessary to argue this way.

  2. 2.

    Active cancellation of sound pressure at a point in a pure tone diffuse sound field is discussed in (Elliott et al. 1988), whereas (Elliott and Garcia-Bonito 1995) reports on active cancellation of pressure and pressure gradient in a diffuse sound field. Active control of stationary random sound fields is analyzed in (Nelson et al. 1990).

  3. 3.

    A modified approach, based on input power, that includes damping effects, unfortunately hidden behind real parts of transfer impedances, was presented in (Elliott 2001).

  4. 4.

    The small shift between the curves for global control of acoustic potential energy and active control of total power input results from the fact that the kinetic acoustic energy (that is implicitly taken into account by controlling the total power input) has a significant contribution below the first acoustic mode, see (Curtis et al. 1987).

  5. 5.

    This also implies that the secondary source is acting non-causally.

  6. 6.

    Applying (6.77) to Q p results in \(L_{Q_{p}}=150.4\) dB.

  7. 7.

    As shown in (Elliott 2001) the matrix H H H is not positive definite for an under-determined system (L<M) and will have at least ML eigenvalues that are equal to zero. Therefore the solution of the under-determined minimization problem is not unique and will not be considered in the present work.

  8. 8.

    As mentioned in (Elliott 2001) convergence against the theoretical limit, defined by (6.93), can only be obtained for a fully determined system using a perfect plant model \(\hat{\mathbf{H}} ={\mathbf{H}}\) and without any weighting β=0.

  9. 9.

    An example for sound pressure approximation is the forward prediction method, see (Munn 2003) and (Moreau et al. 2008), in which the error signals at the remote locations p M are approximated by the error signals obtained from physical error sensors p C such as p M =Fp C , where F contains weighting coefficients determined by finite difference schemes.

  10. 10.

    If it is a not possible to use acoustic transducers for active control, information about the acoustical state may be obtained from non-acoustic reference signals measured by accelerometers. The transmissibility is in such a situation determined by the ratio between the primary noise measured at the l-th monitor microphone and the primary disturbance measured at the l-th accelerometer such as \(T_{l_{M}l_{C}} =P_{pM{l_{m}}}/ A_{pC{l_{C}}}\). For more details, especially on the more advanced approach of radiation mode sensing, the reader is referred to (Fahy and Gardonio 2007).

  11. 11.

    The Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula states that inverse matrix to the matrix A+OP H is given by

    To apply this formula we have to use the identifications \({\mathbf{A}}\equiv\hat{\mathbf{H}}_{0}^{H} {\mathbf{W}}_{p} {\mathbf{H}}_{0}\), \({\mathbf{O}}\equiv\hat{\mathbf{H}}_{0}^{H} {\mathbf{W}}_{p}\), and P HΔ H. For more details see (Golub and Loan 1996).

  12. 12.

    As shown in (Elliott 2001) a control system that uses 6 reference signals, 4 canceling sources and 128 coefficients in each filter would lead to a filter matrix with 3072×3072 elements. Assembling and inverting of such a filter matrix in every time step n is not the goal of fast signal processing.

  13. 13.

    As shown in (Elliott 2001) and (Kuo and Morgan 1996) stability of the single channel least mean square algorithm is assured, if \(0 < \mu< 2/( \tilde{I} \cdot E [ x^{2}( n ) ] )\), where \(\tilde{I}\) can be chosen to equal the length of the control filter I.

  14. 14.

    The index j corresponds to the j-th coefficient of the impulse response of the lm-th secondary path, whereas m corresponds to the m-th controller output signal.

References

  • Akpan UO, Brennan DP, Koko TS, Beslin O, Masson P, Renault S (1999) Active noise and vibration control literature survey: controller technologies. DREA-CR-1999-177, Contractor Report, Defence Research Establishment Atlantic, Dartmouth NS (CAN); MARTEC Ltd, Halifax NS (CAN); Sherbrooke Univ, Sherbrooke QUE (CAN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou A (1979) Digital filters: analysis and design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnason E (1992) Active noise cancellation using a modified form of the filtered-X LMS algorithm. In: Vanderwalle J, Boite R, Moonen M, Oosterlink A (eds) Signal processing VI: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1053–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose KN (1985) Digital filters—theory and applications. Elsevier, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme S, Sachau D, Breitbach H (2009) Concepts for global noise control in cabins. In: Proc of IMAC XXVI a conference and exposition on structural dynamics, Orlando, FL, USA, February 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard M, Quednau S (2000) Multichannel recursive-least-squares algorithms and fast-transversal-filter algorithms for active noise control and sound reproduction systems. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 8(5):606–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassaing R (2005) Digital signal processing and applications with the C6713 and C6416 DSK. Wiley, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis ARD, Nelson PA, Elliott SJ, Bullmore AJ (1987) Active suppression of acoustic resonance. J Acoust Soc Am 81(3):624–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz PSR (2008) Adaptive filtering—algorithms and practical implementations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas SC (1997) Fast exact filtered-X LMS and LMS algorithms for multichannel active noise control. IEEE, Munich, 0-8186-7919-0/9, pp 399–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas SC (1999) Fast implementations of the filtered-X LMS and LMS algorithms for multichannel active noise control. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process 7(4):454–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SJ (2001) Signal processing for active noise control. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SJ (2002) Adaptive methods in active control. In: Tokhi O, Veres S (eds) Active sound and vibration control. Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, pp 57–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SJ, Garcia-Bonito J (1995) Active cancellation of pressure and pressure gradient in a diffuse sound field. J Sound Vib 186(4):696–704

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SJ, Joseph P, Bullmore AJ, Nelson PA (1988) Active cancellation at a point in a pure tone diffuse sound field. J Sound Vib 120(1):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott SJ, Joseph P, Nelson PA, Johnson ME (1991) Power output minimization and power absorption in the active control of sound. J Acoust Soc Am 90(5):2501–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhang-Boroujeny B (1998) Adaptive filters—theory and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy F, Gardonio P (2007) Sound and structural vibration. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Bonito J, Elliott SJ, Boucher CC (1998) Generation of zones of quiet using a virtual microphone arrangement. J Acoust Soc Am 101(6):3498–3616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, Loan CFv (1996) Matrix computation. Johns Hopkins University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guicking D, Karcher K (1984) Active impedance control for one-dimensional sound. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 106:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1996) Adaptive filter theory. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess W (1989) Digitale Filter—Eine Einführung. Teubner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig ML, Messerschmidt DG (1984) Adaptive filters—structure, algorithms and applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RJ (1991) Digitale Signalverarbeitung. Hanser, München in Cooperation with Prentice Hall International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang SW, Kim YH (1997) Active intensity control for the reduction of radiated duct noise. J Sound Vib 201(5):595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletschkowski T, Sachau D (2007a) Lokale aktive Lärmminderung in Schlafräumen. Lärmbekämpfung—Zeitschrift für Akustik Schallschutz und Schwingungstechnik 2(5):174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletschkowski T, Sachau D (2008) Design and calibration test of an active sound intensity probe. Adv Acoust Vib 2008, Article ID:574806

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletschkowski T, Sachau D, Böhme S (2007) Erholsamer Schlaf dank aktiven Gegenschalls. In: Mechatronik 2007—Innovative Produktentwicklung, Wiesloch bei Heidelberg, May 23–24. VDI-Berichte Nr. 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan K (2009) Robuste aktive Schallreduktion in Flugzeugen. Dissertation, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan K, Weizel E, Sachau D (2009a) Evaluation of the stability and performance of an uncertain active noise control system. In: Proc of ACTIVE 2009, Ottawa, Canada, August 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo SM, Morgan DR (1996) Active noise control systems—algorithms and DSP implementations. Wiley, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo SM, Morgan DR (1999) Active noise control: a tutorial review. Proc IEEE 87(6):943–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Kuo SM (2009) Virtual sensing techniques and their applications. In: Proc of the 2009 IEEE int conference on networking, sensing and control, Okayama, March 26–29, pp 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lücker R (1980) Grundlagen digitaler Filter—Eine Einführung in die Theorie linearer zeitdiskreter Systeme und Netzwerke

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlab (2010) Active noise control using a filtered-X LMS FIR adaptive filter. In: Product overview of filter design toolbox 4.7. The Mathworks. http://www.mathworks.com/products/filterdesign/. Cited 04 June 2010

  • Meirovitch L (1990) Dynamics and control of structures. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau D, Cazzolato B, Zander A, Petersen C (2008) A review of virtual sensing algorithms for active noise control. Algorithms 1:69–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschytz G, Hofbauer M (2000) Adaptive Filter—Eine Einführung in die Theorie mit Aufgaben und Matlab-Simulationen auf CD-ROM. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn JM (2003) Virtual sensors for active noise control. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PA, Curtis ARD, Elliott SJ, Bullmore J (1987a) The active minimization of harmonic enclosed sound fields. Part I: Theory. J Acoust Soc Am 117(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PA, Curtis ARD, Elliott SJ, Bullmore J (1987b) The active minimization of harmonic enclosed sound fields. Part II: A computer simulation. J Acoust Soc Am 117(1):15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PA, Curtis ARD, Elliott SJ, Bullmore J (1987c) The active minimization of harmonic enclosed sound fields. Part III: Experimental verification. J Acoust Soc Am 117(1):35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PA, Hammond JK, Joseph P, Elliott SJ (1990) Active control of stationary random sound fields. J Acoust Soc Am 87(3):963–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordufia-Bustamant F, Nelson PA (1992) An adaptive controller for the active absorption of sound. J Acoust Soc Am 91(5):2740–2747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins JW, Tichy J, Nelson PA, Elliott SJ, Bullmore AJ (2000) Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density. J Acoust Soc Am 118(1):192–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawelczyk M (2004) Adaptive noise control algorithms for active headrest system. Control Eng Pract 12:1101–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawelczyk M, Elliott JS, Rafaely B (1997) Active noise control using feedback. Fixed and adaptive controllers. ISVR Technical Memorandum 822, University of Southampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen D, Zander AC, Cazzolato BS, Hansen CH (2005) Optimal virtual sensing for active noise control in a rigid-walled acoustic duct. J Acoust Soc Am 118(5):3086–3093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachau D, Böhme S, Kletschkowski T, Kochan K (2007a) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur aktiven Schalldämmung in einem geschlossenen Raum. Patent Application, DE 10 2007 012 611 A1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachau D, Böhme S, Kletschkowski T, Breitbach H, Simanowski K (2008c) Aktiver Schallblocker Patent Application, DE 10 2006 023630.0 und EP 1 858 004 A2

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayed AH (2003) Fundamentals of adaptive filtering. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang G (1993) Introduction to linear algebra. Cambridge University Press, Wellesley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wan EA (1996) Adjoint LMS: an efficient alternative to the filtered-X LMS and multiple error LMS algorithms. In: Proc of IEEE int conf acoust, speech, signal processing, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Widrow B, Stearns SD (1985) Adaptive signal processing. Prentice Hall International, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zurmühl R (1964) Matrizen und ihre technischen Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kletschkowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kletschkowski, T. (2012). Active Control of Tonal and Broadband Noise. In: Adaptive Feed-Forward Control of Low Frequency Interior Noise. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2537-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2537-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2536-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2537-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics