Abstract
Black and Wiliam (Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London School of Education, 1998) introduced the term ‘inside the black box’ to research in educational assessment in the late 1990s. This metaphor can be applied to current research in problem-based learning (PBL). This chapter addresses the need to look inside the ‘black box’ of PBL by exploring two under-researched aspects – independent study and online learning. Using the Interactional Ethnographic (IE) approach to collect and analyse data in context and over time (across contexts), we systematically examined how students learn between tutorials, to explore how online learning supports independent study in a PBL curriculum. The data sources for this chapter are drawn from a single third-year PBL group (n = 8) in a five-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) curriculum. By focusing on independent study and online learning, the results provide new insights into how multimodal texts and tools support learning across a blended, problem-based curriculum. Data sources included video and screen capture recordings of naturally occurring classroom and independent study activity across one problem cycle. Audio and video data were transcribed using Transana™. Application of key theories of semiosis provided further explanations of how the multimodal texts and mediating tools appropriated throughout a problem cycle were socially and academically consequential to knowledge construction. Evidence was found that the use of various texts and tools across a problem cycle supported a discursive shift from stimulus for hypothesising to evidence for final hypotheses.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agar, M. (2004). We have met the other and we’re all nonlinear: Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system. Journal of Complexity, 10(2), 16–24.
Baker, C. (1997). Membership categorisation and interview accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 130–143). London: Sage.
Barrows, H. (1999). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. In J. A. Rankin (Ed.), Handbook on problem-based learning (pp. 19–26). New York: Forbes.
Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years (Vol. 8). New York: Springer.
Barrows, H. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London School of Education.
Bridges, S. M., Botelho, M. G., & Tsang, P. C. S. (2010). PBL.2.0: Blended learning for an interactive, problem-based pedagogy. Medical Education, 44, 1131.
Bridges, S. M., Dyson, J. E., & Corbet, E. F. (2009). Blended learning, knowledge co-construction and undergraduate group work. Medical Education, 43, 490–491.
Bruner, J. (1962). Introduction. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Thought and language (pp. v–x). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butler, R., Inman, D., & Lobb, D. (2005). Problem-based learning and the medical school: Another case of the emperor's new clothes? Advances in Physiology Education, 29(4), 194–196.
Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2000). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353–400.
Castanheira, M. L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & Yeager, B. (2007). (Re)Formulating identities in the face of fluid modernity: An interactional ethnographic approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 172–189.
Dixon, C., Green, J., & Brandt, L. (2005). Studying the discursive construction of texts in classrooms. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 349–390). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Downing, K. (2009). Problem-based learning and the development of metacognition. Higher Education, 57(5), 609–621.
Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Printing Department, Government of the HKSAR.
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London: Sage.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Wiley.
Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher educaiton:Theory and practice (Vol. 68, pp. 13–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Glenn, P. J., Koschmann, T., & Conlee, M. (1999). Theory presentation and assessment in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 119–133.
Green, J., Dixon, C., & Zaharlick, A. (2003). Ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on the teaching of language arts (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asssociates.
Green, J., & McClelland, M. (1999). What difference does the difference make? Understanding difference across perspectives. Discourse Processes, 27(2), 219–231.
Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Hillenburg, K. L., Cederberg, R. A., Gray, S. A., Hurst, C. L., Johnson, G. K., & Potter, B. J. (2006). E-Learning and the future of dental education: Opinions of administrators and informatin technology specialists. European Journal of Dental Education, 10, 169–177.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 21–39.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist , 31, 191–206.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychology , 41(2), 75–86.
Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies (pp. 182–202). London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London and New York: Routledge.
McGrath, C., Comfort, M. B., Luo, Y., Samaranayake, L. P., & Clark, C. D. (2006). Application of an interactive computer program to manage a problem-based dental curriculum. Journal of Dental Education, 70(4), 387–397.
Mitchell, J. C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research (pp. 238–240). New York: Academic Press.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review , 66(1), 60–92.
Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34(9), 721–728.
Nuthall, G. (2000). The anatomy of memory in the classroom: Understanding how students acquire memory processes from classroom activities in science and social studies units. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 247–304.
Oliver, R., Kersten, H., Vinkka-Puhakka, H., Alpasan, G., Bearn, D., Cema, I., et al. (2008). Curriculum structure: Principles and strategy. European Journal of Dental Education, 12(s1 Global Congress on Dental Education III), 74–84.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.
Prosser, M. (2004). A student learning perspective on teaching and learning with implications for problem-based learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 8, 51–58.
Putney, L. G., Green, J. L., Dixon, C., Duran, R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 86–126). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). Simplest systematics for organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1994). Mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 202–208.
Winning, T., & Townsend, G. (2007). Problem-based learning in dental education: What’s the evidence for and against… and is it worth the effort? Australian Dental Journal, 52(1), 2–9.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the participating undergraduate dental students and PBL facilitators for their support of this study and the University of Hong Kong for research funding. Additional thanks go to Ms Jessica Wong and Ms Rita Suen Po Chu for research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridges, S., Botelho, M., Green, J.L., Chau, A.C. (2012). Multimodality in Problem-Based Learning (PBL): An Interactional Ethnography. In: Bridges, S., McGrath, C., Whitehill, T. (eds) Problem-Based Learning in Clinical Education. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2515-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2515-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2514-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2515-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)