Abstract
Effective nature of science (NOS) instruction is explicit and should be situated in a meaningful context that encourages students to reflect on the scientific enterprise. This approach to NOS instruction aligns with situated learning theory, which espouses that learning cannot be disconnected from the content to which it applies. The process skills-based approach is emerging as an effective way to contextualize NOS instruction. This approach explicitly links familiar inquiry skills such as observation, inference, and experimental design to the more abstract and esoteric NOS concepts (Bell, 2008). Preliminary research suggests that the process skills-based approach is effective in improving learners’ views of NOS and teachers’ abilities to teach NOS. Preservice teachers have shown substantial improvements in their NOS understanding (Matkins & Bell, 2007) and evidence supports that these teachers go on to use the approach to teach their own students about NOS (Bell, Binns, Schnittka, & Toti, 2006). In addition, the process skills-based approach has been linked to increased student achievement when science teachers implemented the approach in their classrooms (Binns, Schnittka, Toti, & Bell, 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but… . Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 215–233.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785–810.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475–487.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2003). Teaching elements of the nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025–1049.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.
Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. (2008). Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20, 45–58.
Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 44, 653–680.
Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72, 73–82.
Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Bell, R. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). Implicit versus explicit nature of science instruction: An explicit response to Palmquist and Finley. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1057–1061.
Bell, R. L., Binns, I., Schnittka, C., & Toti, D. (2006, January). Preservice science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Impacts on classroom practice. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, Portland, OR.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.
Bell, R., Maeng, J. L., Peters, E. E., & Sterling, D. R. (2010, May). Scientific inquiry and the nature of science task force report. Richmond, VA: Virginia Mathematics and Science Coalition.
Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 414–436.
Binns, I. C., Schnittka, C., Toti, D., & Bell, R. L. (2007, April). Preservice science teachers’ nature of science instruction and its impact on pupil learning. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Perspective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science, Science Education, 75, 121–134.
Hanuscin, D., Akerson, V. L., & Phillipson-Mower, T. (2006). Integrating nature of science instruction into a physical science content course for preservice elementary teachers: NOS views of teaching assistants. Science Education, 90, 912–935.
Karplus, R., & Thier, H. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 45, 470–496.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 39, 551–578.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395–418.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 743–760.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without content. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3, 1–12.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An intervention study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1, 135–160.
Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71, 721–734.
Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 773–792.
Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137–163.
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science as expressed in international science education standards documents: A qualitative consensus analysis. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331–354.
National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Olsen, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.
Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 27–41.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Teacher Education, 88, 610–645.
Sneider, C. (1985). Oobleck. Great explorations in mathematics and science. Berkley: Lawrence Hall of Science.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409–421.
Spector, B., & Lederman, N. G. (1990). Science and technology as human enterprises. Dubuque, IA: Kendal-Hunt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bell, R.L., Mulvey, B.K., Maeng, J.L. (2012). Beyond Understanding: Process Skills as a Context for Nature of Science Instruction. In: Khine, M. (eds) Advances in Nature of Science Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2456-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2457-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)