Skip to main content

Use of Double Punch Test to Evaluate the Mechanical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete

  • Chapter
High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites 6

Part of the book series: RILEM State of the Art Reports ((RILEM,volume 2))

Abstract

Mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) determined by material test methods can be used to ensure that the FRC mixture is batched properly and to give indications of performance if used in structural members. An ideal material test method for FRC should give low variability in the measurement of properties such as peak and residual strengths. ACI 318-08 uses results from the third-point bending test [1] as the performance criteria for FRC. Experimental evidence, however, has indicated that this bending type test method has potential problems in the reliability of determining the peak and residual strengths. The coefficient of variation of residual strength is typically very high and generally greater than 20%. The considerable scatter results make it difficult for quality control, particularly when such properties are intended to be used to estimate the strength of structural members. In addition, the complex test setup and the requirement of using a closed-loop servo-controlled machine often prevent its use in small laboratories. Other test methods such as the direct tensile test experience similar problems. As a consequence, these test methods are generally time consuming and expensive as they require more specimens to obtain reliable test data.

The double punch test (DPT) was originally developed, based on the plasticity theory of concrete, to determine the tensile strength of plain concrete but has rarely been used since the 1980s. This test method can be carried out by using conventional compression test machines with small capacity and simple test setup. This study investigates the feasibility of using DPT for the evaluation of mechanical properties and quality control of FRC. Experimental results showed that DPT generally gives much lower variability compared to other test methods. DPT also has the ability to identify important FRC characteristics such as strain-softening, strain-hardening, stiffness, tensile strength, residual strength, and toughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASTM C1609/C1609M-10, Standard Test method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, p. 9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mindess, S., Young, J.F., Darwin, D.: Concrete, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary (ACI318-08/ACI318R-08). American Concrete Institute, Detroit (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard, E.S.: Correlations in the Behaviour of Fibre Reinforced Shotcrete Beam and Panel Specimens. Materials and Structures 35, 156–164 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W.F.: Double Punch Test for Tensile Strength of Concrete. ACI Journal, 993–995 (December 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, W.F.: Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, ch. 11, pp. 501–541. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, W.F., Yuan, R.L.: Tensile strength of concrete: Double-Punch Test. Journal of Structural Division, Proceeding of American Society of Engineers 106(ST8) (August 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molins, C., Aguado, A., Saludes, S.: Double Punch Test to Control the Energy Dissipation in Tension of FRC (Barcelona Test). Material and Structures 42, 415–425 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao, S.-H., Cho, J.-S., Karki, N. B., Yazdani, N.: FRC Performance Comparison: Direct Tensile Test, Beam-Type Bending Test, and Round Panel Test. ACI Special Publication (2011, to be published)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chao, S.H., Karki, N.B., Cho, J.S., Waweru, R.N. (2012). Use of Double Punch Test to Evaluate the Mechanical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete. In: Parra-Montesinos, G.J., Reinhardt, H.W., Naaman, A.E. (eds) High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites 6. RILEM State of the Art Reports, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2436-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2436-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2435-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2436-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics