Skip to main content

The Uninvited Guest: ‘Local Realism’ and the Bell Theorem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings ((EPSP,volume 1))

Abstract

The Western philosophical thought has learnt since its very early days that the idea that there is a world out there – a world whose properties are (at least partially) independent from what we might think of them and even from our very attempts to have access to them – has a peculiar status. Although for some the idea of a world out there is too obviously right in order to waste time to argue in favour of it, whereas for others it is too obviously wrong in order to waste time to try to refute it, most philosophers would agree that a more or less sophisticated array of arguments is needed in order to make realism (or anti-realism, or any variant that lies in the continuum between these two poles) a plausible position. This long and honoured story, however, seems to be forgotten when considered from the standpoint of the foundations of contemporary physics. Surprisingly enough, the world-out-there-idea has recently acquired to the eyes of many physicists and philosophers of physics the status of a pathology, to be recognized as such and to be eradicated as soon as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other possible references include Fuchs and Peres (2002), Peres and Terno (2004), Aspelmeyer and Zeilinger (2008).

  2. 2.

    In the literature on the Bell theorem and local realism, it is common to find the expressions ‘local hidden variables theories’ and ‘local realistic theories’ treated as synonymous, and this is why the above quotation is relevant for my argument. Clearly, equating such expressions is debatable, but the explanation of why might be the subject of another paper.

  3. 3.

    An ‘objective’ account would be an account in which we can distinguish ‘reality’ from ‘knowledge of reality’, even though such account should indeed be able to describe suitably the very processes by which we gain knowledge of reality. For an instructive sample of quotations on the centrality of ‘local realism’ see Norsen (2007), pp. 312–314, and Laudisa (2008), pp. 1113–1115.

  4. 4.

    A similar point, although relative to the derivation of the CHSH inequality in Clauser et al. (1969), has been raised by Norsen (2007), p. 319.

  5. 5.

    An analogous argument can be formulated about Blaylock (2010), which is a recent review paper on the Bell theorem: for a critical reply to Blaylock along lines similar to the viewpoint advocated here, see Maudlin (2010).

  6. 6.

    See for instance the discussion of exactly how the pre-existent locations of particle determine the outcomes of ‘spin measurements’ in Albert (1992).

References

  • Albert, D. 1992. Quantum mechanics and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansmann, M., H. Wang, R.C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A.D. O’Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, A.N. Cleland, and J.M. Martinis. 2009. Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461: 504–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelmeyer, M., and A. Zeilinger. 2008. A quantum renaissance. Physics World (July issue) 21: 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S. 1964. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S. 1971. Introduction to the hidden-variable question. In Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ed. B. D’Espagnat, 171–181. New York and London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S. 1981. Bertlmann’s socks and the nature of reality. Journal de Physique 42: 41–61 (reprinted in Bell (2004): 139–158).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S. 2004. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock, G. 2010. The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of Physics 78: 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brukner, C., and A. Zeilinger. 2009. Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities, Foundations of Physics 39: 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brukner, C., and M. Žukowski M. forthcoming. Bell’s inequalities: Foundations and quantum communication. In Handbook of natural computing, eds. G. Rozenberg, G. Baeck, T.H.W. Kok, and N. Joost. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, J.F., and M.A. Horne. 1974. Experimental consequences of objective local theories, Physical Review D10: 526–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, J.F., M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt. 1969. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters 23: 880–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì. 2004. Quantum equilibrium and the role of operators as observables in quantum theory. Journal of Statistical Physics 116: 959–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A. 1986. The Shaky game. Einstein realism and the quantum theory. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C.A., and A. Peres. 2002. Quantum theory needs no ‘interpretation’. Physics Today 53: 70–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi, G.C. 2009. The interpretation of quantum mechanics: Where do we stand? Journal of Physics, Conf. Ser. 174: 012013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi, G.C., and R. Grassi. 1994. Outcome predictions and property attribution: The EPR argument reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25: 397–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. 2001. Bohmian mechanics. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-bohm

  • Gröblacher, S., T. Paterek, R. Kaltenbaek, C. Brukner, M. Žukowski, M. Aspelmeyer, and A. Zeilinger. 2007. An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature 446: 871–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudisa, F. 2008. Non-local realistic theories and the scope of the Bell theorem. Foundations of Physics 38: 1110–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, A. 2003. Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: An incompatibility theorem. Foundations of Physics 33: 1469–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, A. 2008. Realism and the physical world. Reports on Progress in Physics 71: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T. 1996. Space-time in the quantum world. In Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: An appraisal, eds. J. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein, 285–307. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T. 2010. What Bell proved: A reply to Blaylock. American Journal of Physics 78: 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsen, T. 2007. Against ‘realism’. Foundations of Physics 37: 311–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, M., and C. Brukner. 2009. Monogamy of Bell’s inequality violations in nonsignaling theories. Physical Review Letters 102: 030403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres, A., and D. Terno. 2004. Quantum information and relativity theory. Review of Modern Physics 76: 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weihs, G. 2007. The truth about reality. Nature 445: 723–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeilinger, A. 2005. The message of the quantum. Nature 438: 743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žukowski, M. 2005. On the paradoxical book of bell. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36: 566–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Laudisa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Laudisa, F. (2012). The Uninvited Guest: ‘Local Realism’ and the Bell Theorem. In: de Regt, H., Hartmann, S., Okasha, S. (eds) EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics