Abstract
In the concluding chapter, the author finally fleshes out the specific characteristics of the essayist writing as a pedagogical practice as well as the kind of subjectivity that this essayist writing tends to cultivate through its practice. Then readers will finally be in a position to judge whether the author’s intellectual journey in this book is worth accompanying or not; this judgment is fully in the readers’ hands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I sometimes express this original sense or Montaigne’s sense of the essay as “the essayist form of writing” to avoid possible confusions since “the essay” as a common term these days tends to refer to an article written in an academic form, which is exactly the form of writing that these essayists oppose in advancing “the essay” as a literary genre.
- 2.
It should be noted by this point of my argument in the book that “reading” and “writing” are inseparable in the essayist form of writing since essay writing is always about the reading of the text that already exists.
- 3.
See Wendy Kohli (1997) for an early discourse on this line of critique.
- 4.
The discourse on alternative methodologies and writing-forms has been one of hottest research topics for the last decade in the fields of philosophy of education and curriculum theories. Narrative inquiry, phenomenological method, autobiographical method and others have been suggested as alternative forms of educational research and writing. To see the trend of current scholarship on this topic, refer to: Peters (2009), Ruitenberg (2009), Bridges (2003), and Bridges and Smith (2007).
References
Barthes, R. (1987). Criticism and truth (K. P. Keuneman, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bridges, D. (2003). Fiction written under Oath: Essays in philosophy and educational research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bridges, D., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2007). Philosophy and educational research. Philosophy, methodology and educational research. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cavell, S. (1972). The senses of Walden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cully, I. (1984). Education for spiritual growth. London: Harpercollins.
Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.
Hutchins, R. M. (1969). The learning society. New York: New American Library.
Kohli, W. (Ed.). (1997). Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.
Lukács, G. (1971). Soul and form (A. Bostock, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in school. New York: Teacher College Press.
Ota, C., & Chater, M. (2007). Spiritual education in a divided world. London: Routledge.
Palmer, P. J. (1999). Let your life speak. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peters, M. (Ed.). (2009). Phenomenology and education [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1).
Ruitenberg, C. (Ed.). (2009). The question of method in philosophy of education [Special issue]. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(3)
Steiner, C., & Perry, P. (1999). Achieving emotional literacy. London: Bloomsbury.
Weare, K. (2004). Developing the emotionally literate school. London: Sage.
Westerhoff, J. H., & Eusden, J. D. (1982). The spiritual life: Learning east and west. New York: Seabury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwak, DJ. (2012). Conclusion: The Essay Form of Writing for a Tragic Form of Subjectivity. In: Education for Self-transformation. Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2401-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2401-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2400-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2401-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)