Skip to main content

Conclusion: The Essay Form of Writing for a Tragic Form of Subjectivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education for Self-transformation

Part of the book series: Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education ((COPT,volume 3))

  • 664 Accesses

Abstract

In the concluding chapter, the author finally fleshes out the specific characteristics of the essayist writing as a pedagogical practice as well as the kind of subjectivity that this essayist writing tends to cultivate through its practice. Then readers will finally be in a position to judge whether the author’s intellectual journey in this book is worth accompanying or not; this judgment is fully in the readers’ hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I sometimes express this original sense or Montaigne’s sense of the essay as “the essayist form of writing” to avoid possible confusions since “the essay” as a common term these days tends to refer to an article written in an academic form, which is exactly the form of writing that these essayists oppose in advancing “the essay” as a literary genre.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted by this point of my argument in the book that “reading” and “writing” are inseparable in the essayist form of writing since essay writing is always about the reading of the text that already exists.

  3. 3.

    See Wendy Kohli (1997) for an early discourse on this line of critique.

  4. 4.

    The discourse on alternative methodologies and writing-forms has been one of hottest research topics for the last decade in the fields of philosophy of education and curriculum theories. Narrative inquiry, phenomenological method, autobiographical method and others have been suggested as alternative forms of educational research and writing. To see the trend of current scholarship on this topic, refer to: Peters (2009), Ruitenberg (2009), Bridges (2003), and Bridges and Smith (2007).

References

  • Barthes, R. (1987). Criticism and truth (K. P. Keuneman, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (2003). Fiction written under Oath: Essays in philosophy and educational research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2007). Philosophy and educational research. Philosophy, methodology and educational research. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1972). The senses of Walden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cully, I. (1984). Education for spiritual growth. London: Harpercollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, R. M. (1969). The learning society. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, W. (Ed.). (1997). Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1971). Soul and form (A. Bostock, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in school. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ota, C., & Chater, M. (2007). Spiritual education in a divided world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (1999). Let your life speak. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (Ed.). (2009). Phenomenology and education [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruitenberg, C. (Ed.). (2009). The question of method in philosophy of education [Special issue]. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C., & Perry, P. (1999). Achieving emotional literacy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weare, K. (2004). Developing the emotionally literate school. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff, J. H., & Eusden, J. D. (1982). The spiritual life: Learning east and west. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duck-Joo Kwak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kwak, DJ. (2012). Conclusion: The Essay Form of Writing for a Tragic Form of Subjectivity. In: Education for Self-transformation. Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2401-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics