Skip to main content

The Keegstra Affair: A Test Case for Critical Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 21))

Abstract

The so-called “Keegstra affair” is offered as a test case for the teaching of critical thinking skills in high school history and social studies classes. James Keegstra was a high school history teacher in Alberta, Canada, who taught his students that there is a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and that the Holocaust did not occur. His teaching is analyzed in terms of three of its salient features: his theory of history, his historical methodology and the way he taught history. His theory of history is a prioristic rather than empirical. His methodology was to appeal to the Bible and such sources as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion—the former being a mix of religion, ethics and history; the latter being thoroughly discredited by reliable authorities. He taught history by offering evidence supporting his interpretations, but without seeking out and considering evidence against them, except to discredit it. It is argued that students need to learn how to think critically about history in the specific ways needed to recognize, understand and avoid the flaws of Keegstra’s approach.

Reprinted, with permission, from The History and Social Science Teacher, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Spring, 1986), pp. 158–164.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1986 called The History and Social Science Teacher; in 2011 called Canadian Social Studies.

References

  • Cederblom, J., & Paulsen, D. W. (1982). Critical reasoning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, N. R. C. C. (1981). Warrant for genocide: the myth of the Jewish world conspiracy and the protocols of the Elders of Zion. Chico, CA: Scholars Press. (Reprint of Harper Torchbook edition, 1969.)

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Angelo, E. (1971). The teaching of critical thinking. Amsterdam: B.R. Gruner, N.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1985, February 5). Goals for a critical-thinking/reasoning curriculum. Illinois Critical Thinking Project. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N. (1979). Understanding scientific reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globe and Mail. (1984). Toronto, ON, June 5–9, 12, 14, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globe and Mail. (1985a). Toronto, ON, April 22–27, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M. (1985). Keegstra’s children. Saturday Night Magazine, May, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor Board of Education. (1982). Grade seven history curriculum. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globe and Mail. (1985b). Toronto, ON, May 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Anthony Blair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blair, J.A. (2012). The Keegstra Affair: A Test Case for Critical Thinking. In: Tindale, C. (eds) Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics